The sources of two components of variance

An example of multifinger cyclic force production tasks at different frequencies

Jason Friedman, Varadhan Skm, Vladimir M. Zatsiorsky, Mark Latash

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In a multifinger cyclic force production task, the finger force variance measured across trials can be decomposed into two components, one that affects the combined force output ("bad variance") and one that does not ("good variance"). Previous studies have found similar time patterns of "bad variance" and force rate leading to an approximately linear relationship between them. Based on this finding and a recently developed model of multifinger force production, we expected the "bad variance" during cyclic force production to increase monotonically with the rate of force change, both within a cycle and across trials at different frequencies. Alternatively, "bad variance" could show a dependence on task frequency, not on actual force derivative values. Healthy subjects were required to produce cyclic force patterns to prescribed targets by pressing on unidimensional force sensors, at a frequency set by a metronome. The task was performed with only the index finger, and with all four fingers. In the task with all four fingers, the "good variance" increased approximately linearly with an increase in the force magnitude. The "bad variance" showed within-a-cycle modulation similar to that of the force rate. However, an increase in the frequency did not lead to an increase in the "bad variance" that could be expected based on the natural relationships between action frequency and the rate of force change modulation. The results have been interpreted in the framework of an earlier model of multifinger force production where "bad variance" is a result of variance of the timing parameter. The unexpected lack of modulation of the "bad variance" with frequency suggests a drop in variance of the timing parameter with increased frequency. This mechanism may serve to maintain a constant acceptable level of variance under different conditions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)263-277
Number of pages15
JournalExperimental Brain Research
Volume196
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2009

Fingerprint

Advisory Committees
Fingers
Healthy Volunteers

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

@article{8a45a0cc97e640a68f13d9aafd7f2ac8,
title = "The sources of two components of variance: An example of multifinger cyclic force production tasks at different frequencies",
abstract = "In a multifinger cyclic force production task, the finger force variance measured across trials can be decomposed into two components, one that affects the combined force output ({"}bad variance{"}) and one that does not ({"}good variance{"}). Previous studies have found similar time patterns of {"}bad variance{"} and force rate leading to an approximately linear relationship between them. Based on this finding and a recently developed model of multifinger force production, we expected the {"}bad variance{"} during cyclic force production to increase monotonically with the rate of force change, both within a cycle and across trials at different frequencies. Alternatively, {"}bad variance{"} could show a dependence on task frequency, not on actual force derivative values. Healthy subjects were required to produce cyclic force patterns to prescribed targets by pressing on unidimensional force sensors, at a frequency set by a metronome. The task was performed with only the index finger, and with all four fingers. In the task with all four fingers, the {"}good variance{"} increased approximately linearly with an increase in the force magnitude. The {"}bad variance{"} showed within-a-cycle modulation similar to that of the force rate. However, an increase in the frequency did not lead to an increase in the {"}bad variance{"} that could be expected based on the natural relationships between action frequency and the rate of force change modulation. The results have been interpreted in the framework of an earlier model of multifinger force production where {"}bad variance{"} is a result of variance of the timing parameter. The unexpected lack of modulation of the {"}bad variance{"} with frequency suggests a drop in variance of the timing parameter with increased frequency. This mechanism may serve to maintain a constant acceptable level of variance under different conditions.",
author = "Jason Friedman and Varadhan Skm and Zatsiorsky, {Vladimir M.} and Mark Latash",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00221-009-1846-x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "196",
pages = "263--277",
journal = "Experimental Brain Research",
issn = "0014-4819",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "2",

}

The sources of two components of variance : An example of multifinger cyclic force production tasks at different frequencies. / Friedman, Jason; Skm, Varadhan; Zatsiorsky, Vladimir M.; Latash, Mark.

In: Experimental Brain Research, Vol. 196, No. 2, 01.06.2009, p. 263-277.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The sources of two components of variance

T2 - An example of multifinger cyclic force production tasks at different frequencies

AU - Friedman, Jason

AU - Skm, Varadhan

AU - Zatsiorsky, Vladimir M.

AU - Latash, Mark

PY - 2009/6/1

Y1 - 2009/6/1

N2 - In a multifinger cyclic force production task, the finger force variance measured across trials can be decomposed into two components, one that affects the combined force output ("bad variance") and one that does not ("good variance"). Previous studies have found similar time patterns of "bad variance" and force rate leading to an approximately linear relationship between them. Based on this finding and a recently developed model of multifinger force production, we expected the "bad variance" during cyclic force production to increase monotonically with the rate of force change, both within a cycle and across trials at different frequencies. Alternatively, "bad variance" could show a dependence on task frequency, not on actual force derivative values. Healthy subjects were required to produce cyclic force patterns to prescribed targets by pressing on unidimensional force sensors, at a frequency set by a metronome. The task was performed with only the index finger, and with all four fingers. In the task with all four fingers, the "good variance" increased approximately linearly with an increase in the force magnitude. The "bad variance" showed within-a-cycle modulation similar to that of the force rate. However, an increase in the frequency did not lead to an increase in the "bad variance" that could be expected based on the natural relationships between action frequency and the rate of force change modulation. The results have been interpreted in the framework of an earlier model of multifinger force production where "bad variance" is a result of variance of the timing parameter. The unexpected lack of modulation of the "bad variance" with frequency suggests a drop in variance of the timing parameter with increased frequency. This mechanism may serve to maintain a constant acceptable level of variance under different conditions.

AB - In a multifinger cyclic force production task, the finger force variance measured across trials can be decomposed into two components, one that affects the combined force output ("bad variance") and one that does not ("good variance"). Previous studies have found similar time patterns of "bad variance" and force rate leading to an approximately linear relationship between them. Based on this finding and a recently developed model of multifinger force production, we expected the "bad variance" during cyclic force production to increase monotonically with the rate of force change, both within a cycle and across trials at different frequencies. Alternatively, "bad variance" could show a dependence on task frequency, not on actual force derivative values. Healthy subjects were required to produce cyclic force patterns to prescribed targets by pressing on unidimensional force sensors, at a frequency set by a metronome. The task was performed with only the index finger, and with all four fingers. In the task with all four fingers, the "good variance" increased approximately linearly with an increase in the force magnitude. The "bad variance" showed within-a-cycle modulation similar to that of the force rate. However, an increase in the frequency did not lead to an increase in the "bad variance" that could be expected based on the natural relationships between action frequency and the rate of force change modulation. The results have been interpreted in the framework of an earlier model of multifinger force production where "bad variance" is a result of variance of the timing parameter. The unexpected lack of modulation of the "bad variance" with frequency suggests a drop in variance of the timing parameter with increased frequency. This mechanism may serve to maintain a constant acceptable level of variance under different conditions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67649114152&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67649114152&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00221-009-1846-x

DO - 10.1007/s00221-009-1846-x

M3 - Article

VL - 196

SP - 263

EP - 277

JO - Experimental Brain Research

JF - Experimental Brain Research

SN - 0014-4819

IS - 2

ER -