The strange case of Araki Yasusada: Author, object

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The essay reads the authorial hoax surrounding Araki Yasusada, said to be the author of poems relating experiences in post-Hiroshima Japan. The case - Yasusada's poems seem to have been written by a white American man - recalls (not for the first time) the difficulty the literary imagination has in dealing with biographical authorship. After examining the polemics the case generated around poetries of witness, the essay connects Yasusada's imagination to three other ideas: first, the collectively pathological memory associated with historical trauma (exemplified by Binjamin Wilkomirski's Fragments); second, subject-object relations in modern poetry (the essay closely reads two Yasusada poems in terms of their phenomenological concerns); and, third, a debate around the question of "woman's writing" carried on by Nancy K. Miller and Peggy Kamuf and inspired by another authorial hoax. The essay concludes by thinking about authors as historical objects - objects of readers' subjective perception of them. (ERJH)

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPMLA
Volume120
Issue number1
StatePublished - Dec 1 2005

Fingerprint

poetry
witness
trauma
Japan
Poem
experience
Hoax
imagination
Authorship
Witness
Trauma
Object Relations
Women's Writing
Poetry
Modern Poetry
Reader
Hiroshima

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Literature and Literary Theory

Cite this

@article{a505c25c4dcc44a1b18d6d00ccc43d5d,
title = "The strange case of Araki Yasusada: Author, object",
abstract = "The essay reads the authorial hoax surrounding Araki Yasusada, said to be the author of poems relating experiences in post-Hiroshima Japan. The case - Yasusada's poems seem to have been written by a white American man - recalls (not for the first time) the difficulty the literary imagination has in dealing with biographical authorship. After examining the polemics the case generated around poetries of witness, the essay connects Yasusada's imagination to three other ideas: first, the collectively pathological memory associated with historical trauma (exemplified by Binjamin Wilkomirski's Fragments); second, subject-object relations in modern poetry (the essay closely reads two Yasusada poems in terms of their phenomenological concerns); and, third, a debate around the question of {"}woman's writing{"} carried on by Nancy K. Miller and Peggy Kamuf and inspired by another authorial hoax. The essay concludes by thinking about authors as historical objects - objects of readers' subjective perception of them. (ERJH)",
author = "Hayot, {Eric Robert}",
year = "2005",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "120",
journal = "PMLA",
issn = "0030-8129",
publisher = "Modern Language Association of America",
number = "1",

}

The strange case of Araki Yasusada : Author, object. / Hayot, Eric Robert.

In: PMLA, Vol. 120, No. 1, 01.12.2005.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The strange case of Araki Yasusada

T2 - Author, object

AU - Hayot, Eric Robert

PY - 2005/12/1

Y1 - 2005/12/1

N2 - The essay reads the authorial hoax surrounding Araki Yasusada, said to be the author of poems relating experiences in post-Hiroshima Japan. The case - Yasusada's poems seem to have been written by a white American man - recalls (not for the first time) the difficulty the literary imagination has in dealing with biographical authorship. After examining the polemics the case generated around poetries of witness, the essay connects Yasusada's imagination to three other ideas: first, the collectively pathological memory associated with historical trauma (exemplified by Binjamin Wilkomirski's Fragments); second, subject-object relations in modern poetry (the essay closely reads two Yasusada poems in terms of their phenomenological concerns); and, third, a debate around the question of "woman's writing" carried on by Nancy K. Miller and Peggy Kamuf and inspired by another authorial hoax. The essay concludes by thinking about authors as historical objects - objects of readers' subjective perception of them. (ERJH)

AB - The essay reads the authorial hoax surrounding Araki Yasusada, said to be the author of poems relating experiences in post-Hiroshima Japan. The case - Yasusada's poems seem to have been written by a white American man - recalls (not for the first time) the difficulty the literary imagination has in dealing with biographical authorship. After examining the polemics the case generated around poetries of witness, the essay connects Yasusada's imagination to three other ideas: first, the collectively pathological memory associated with historical trauma (exemplified by Binjamin Wilkomirski's Fragments); second, subject-object relations in modern poetry (the essay closely reads two Yasusada poems in terms of their phenomenological concerns); and, third, a debate around the question of "woman's writing" carried on by Nancy K. Miller and Peggy Kamuf and inspired by another authorial hoax. The essay concludes by thinking about authors as historical objects - objects of readers' subjective perception of them. (ERJH)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=60950443135&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=60950443135&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:60950443135

VL - 120

JO - PMLA

JF - PMLA

SN - 0030-8129

IS - 1

ER -