The teaching of ethics and professionalism in plastic surgery residency

A cross-sectional survey

Katelyn G. Bennett, John Ingraham, Lisa F. Schneider, Pierre B. Saadeh, Christian J. Vercler

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The ethical practice of medicine has always been of utmost importance, and plastic surgery is no exception. The literature is devoid of information on the teaching of ethics and professionalism in plastic surgery. In light of this, a survey was sent to ascertain the status of ethics training in plastic surgery residencies. Methods: A 21-question survey was sent from the American Council of Academic Plastic Surgeons meeting to 180 plastic surgery program directors and coordinators via email. Survey questions inquired about practice environment, number of residents, presence of a formal ethics training program, among others. Binary regression was used to determine if any relationships existed between categorical variables, and Poisson linear regression was used to assess relationships between continuous variables. Statistical significance was set at a P value of 0.05. Results: A total of 104 members responded to the survey (58% response rate). Sixty-three percent were program directors, and most (89%) practiced in academic settings. Sixty-two percent in academics reported having a formal training program, and 60%in private practice reported having one. Only 40% of programs with fewer than 10 residents had ethics training, whereas 78% of programs with more than 20 residents did. The odds of having a training program were slightly higher (odds ratio, 1.1) with more residents (P = 0.17). Conclusions: Despite the lack of information in the literature, formal ethics and professionalism training does exist in many plastic surgery residencies, although barriers to implementation do exist. Plastic surgery leadership should be involved in the development of standardized curricula to help overcome these barriers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)552-556
Number of pages5
JournalAnnals of Plastic Surgery
Volume78
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Plastic Surgery
Internship and Residency
Ethics
Teaching
Cross-Sectional Studies
Education
Private Practice
Curriculum
Professionalism
Linear Models
Odds Ratio
Medicine
Surveys and Questionnaires

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery

Cite this

Bennett, Katelyn G. ; Ingraham, John ; Schneider, Lisa F. ; Saadeh, Pierre B. ; Vercler, Christian J. / The teaching of ethics and professionalism in plastic surgery residency : A cross-sectional survey. In: Annals of Plastic Surgery. 2017 ; Vol. 78, No. 5. pp. 552-556.
@article{290a0588de674fd58ab40c1d8332640e,
title = "The teaching of ethics and professionalism in plastic surgery residency: A cross-sectional survey",
abstract = "Background: The ethical practice of medicine has always been of utmost importance, and plastic surgery is no exception. The literature is devoid of information on the teaching of ethics and professionalism in plastic surgery. In light of this, a survey was sent to ascertain the status of ethics training in plastic surgery residencies. Methods: A 21-question survey was sent from the American Council of Academic Plastic Surgeons meeting to 180 plastic surgery program directors and coordinators via email. Survey questions inquired about practice environment, number of residents, presence of a formal ethics training program, among others. Binary regression was used to determine if any relationships existed between categorical variables, and Poisson linear regression was used to assess relationships between continuous variables. Statistical significance was set at a P value of 0.05. Results: A total of 104 members responded to the survey (58{\%} response rate). Sixty-three percent were program directors, and most (89{\%}) practiced in academic settings. Sixty-two percent in academics reported having a formal training program, and 60{\%}in private practice reported having one. Only 40{\%} of programs with fewer than 10 residents had ethics training, whereas 78{\%} of programs with more than 20 residents did. The odds of having a training program were slightly higher (odds ratio, 1.1) with more residents (P = 0.17). Conclusions: Despite the lack of information in the literature, formal ethics and professionalism training does exist in many plastic surgery residencies, although barriers to implementation do exist. Plastic surgery leadership should be involved in the development of standardized curricula to help overcome these barriers.",
author = "Bennett, {Katelyn G.} and John Ingraham and Schneider, {Lisa F.} and Saadeh, {Pierre B.} and Vercler, {Christian J.}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/SAP.0000000000000919",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "78",
pages = "552--556",
journal = "Annals of Plastic Surgery",
issn = "0148-7043",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

The teaching of ethics and professionalism in plastic surgery residency : A cross-sectional survey. / Bennett, Katelyn G.; Ingraham, John; Schneider, Lisa F.; Saadeh, Pierre B.; Vercler, Christian J.

In: Annals of Plastic Surgery, Vol. 78, No. 5, 01.01.2017, p. 552-556.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - The teaching of ethics and professionalism in plastic surgery residency

T2 - A cross-sectional survey

AU - Bennett, Katelyn G.

AU - Ingraham, John

AU - Schneider, Lisa F.

AU - Saadeh, Pierre B.

AU - Vercler, Christian J.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Background: The ethical practice of medicine has always been of utmost importance, and plastic surgery is no exception. The literature is devoid of information on the teaching of ethics and professionalism in plastic surgery. In light of this, a survey was sent to ascertain the status of ethics training in plastic surgery residencies. Methods: A 21-question survey was sent from the American Council of Academic Plastic Surgeons meeting to 180 plastic surgery program directors and coordinators via email. Survey questions inquired about practice environment, number of residents, presence of a formal ethics training program, among others. Binary regression was used to determine if any relationships existed between categorical variables, and Poisson linear regression was used to assess relationships between continuous variables. Statistical significance was set at a P value of 0.05. Results: A total of 104 members responded to the survey (58% response rate). Sixty-three percent were program directors, and most (89%) practiced in academic settings. Sixty-two percent in academics reported having a formal training program, and 60%in private practice reported having one. Only 40% of programs with fewer than 10 residents had ethics training, whereas 78% of programs with more than 20 residents did. The odds of having a training program were slightly higher (odds ratio, 1.1) with more residents (P = 0.17). Conclusions: Despite the lack of information in the literature, formal ethics and professionalism training does exist in many plastic surgery residencies, although barriers to implementation do exist. Plastic surgery leadership should be involved in the development of standardized curricula to help overcome these barriers.

AB - Background: The ethical practice of medicine has always been of utmost importance, and plastic surgery is no exception. The literature is devoid of information on the teaching of ethics and professionalism in plastic surgery. In light of this, a survey was sent to ascertain the status of ethics training in plastic surgery residencies. Methods: A 21-question survey was sent from the American Council of Academic Plastic Surgeons meeting to 180 plastic surgery program directors and coordinators via email. Survey questions inquired about practice environment, number of residents, presence of a formal ethics training program, among others. Binary regression was used to determine if any relationships existed between categorical variables, and Poisson linear regression was used to assess relationships between continuous variables. Statistical significance was set at a P value of 0.05. Results: A total of 104 members responded to the survey (58% response rate). Sixty-three percent were program directors, and most (89%) practiced in academic settings. Sixty-two percent in academics reported having a formal training program, and 60%in private practice reported having one. Only 40% of programs with fewer than 10 residents had ethics training, whereas 78% of programs with more than 20 residents did. The odds of having a training program were slightly higher (odds ratio, 1.1) with more residents (P = 0.17). Conclusions: Despite the lack of information in the literature, formal ethics and professionalism training does exist in many plastic surgery residencies, although barriers to implementation do exist. Plastic surgery leadership should be involved in the development of standardized curricula to help overcome these barriers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84991517720&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84991517720&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000919

DO - 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000919

M3 - Review article

VL - 78

SP - 552

EP - 556

JO - Annals of Plastic Surgery

JF - Annals of Plastic Surgery

SN - 0148-7043

IS - 5

ER -