The theory and practice of genetically engineered crops and agricultural sustainability

David E. Ervin, Leland Luther Glenna, Raymond A. Jussaume

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The development of genetically engineered (GE) crops has focused predominantly on enhancing conventional pest control approaches. Scientific assessments show that these GE crops generally deliver significant economic and some environmental benefits over their conventional crop alternatives. However, emerging evidence indicates that current GE crops will not foster sustainable cropping systems unless the negative environmental and social feedback effects are properly addressed. Moreover, GE crop innovations that promote more sustainable agricultural systems will receive underinvestment by seed and chemical companies that must understandably focus on private returns for major crops. Opportunities to promote crops that convey multi-faceted benefits for the environment and the poor are foundational to a sustainable food system and should not be neglected because they also represent global public goods. In this paper, we develop a set of criteria that can guide the development of GE crops consistent with contemporary sustainable agriculture theory and practice. Based on those principles, we offer policy options and recommendations for reforming public and private R & D and commercialization processes to further the potential contributions of GE crops to sustainable agriculture. Two strategies that would help achieve this goal would be to restore the centrality of the public sector in agricultural R & D and to open the technology development process to more democratic participation by farmers and other stakeholders.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)847-874
Number of pages28
JournalSustainability
Volume3
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2011

Fingerprint

alternative agriculture
Crops
Sustainable development
sustainability
crop
agriculture
commercialization
public sector
farmer
stakeholder
food
innovation
Agriculture
participation
Pest control
evidence
economics
technological development
pest control
Reforming reactions

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

@article{eba7631812844862acf415f97f1e34ee,
title = "The theory and practice of genetically engineered crops and agricultural sustainability",
abstract = "The development of genetically engineered (GE) crops has focused predominantly on enhancing conventional pest control approaches. Scientific assessments show that these GE crops generally deliver significant economic and some environmental benefits over their conventional crop alternatives. However, emerging evidence indicates that current GE crops will not foster sustainable cropping systems unless the negative environmental and social feedback effects are properly addressed. Moreover, GE crop innovations that promote more sustainable agricultural systems will receive underinvestment by seed and chemical companies that must understandably focus on private returns for major crops. Opportunities to promote crops that convey multi-faceted benefits for the environment and the poor are foundational to a sustainable food system and should not be neglected because they also represent global public goods. In this paper, we develop a set of criteria that can guide the development of GE crops consistent with contemporary sustainable agriculture theory and practice. Based on those principles, we offer policy options and recommendations for reforming public and private R & D and commercialization processes to further the potential contributions of GE crops to sustainable agriculture. Two strategies that would help achieve this goal would be to restore the centrality of the public sector in agricultural R & D and to open the technology development process to more democratic participation by farmers and other stakeholders.",
author = "Ervin, {David E.} and Glenna, {Leland Luther} and Jussaume, {Raymond A.}",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3390/su3060847",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "847--874",
journal = "Sustainability",
issn = "2071-1050",
publisher = "MDPI AG",
number = "6",

}

The theory and practice of genetically engineered crops and agricultural sustainability. / Ervin, David E.; Glenna, Leland Luther; Jussaume, Raymond A.

In: Sustainability, Vol. 3, No. 6, 01.12.2011, p. 847-874.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The theory and practice of genetically engineered crops and agricultural sustainability

AU - Ervin, David E.

AU - Glenna, Leland Luther

AU - Jussaume, Raymond A.

PY - 2011/12/1

Y1 - 2011/12/1

N2 - The development of genetically engineered (GE) crops has focused predominantly on enhancing conventional pest control approaches. Scientific assessments show that these GE crops generally deliver significant economic and some environmental benefits over their conventional crop alternatives. However, emerging evidence indicates that current GE crops will not foster sustainable cropping systems unless the negative environmental and social feedback effects are properly addressed. Moreover, GE crop innovations that promote more sustainable agricultural systems will receive underinvestment by seed and chemical companies that must understandably focus on private returns for major crops. Opportunities to promote crops that convey multi-faceted benefits for the environment and the poor are foundational to a sustainable food system and should not be neglected because they also represent global public goods. In this paper, we develop a set of criteria that can guide the development of GE crops consistent with contemporary sustainable agriculture theory and practice. Based on those principles, we offer policy options and recommendations for reforming public and private R & D and commercialization processes to further the potential contributions of GE crops to sustainable agriculture. Two strategies that would help achieve this goal would be to restore the centrality of the public sector in agricultural R & D and to open the technology development process to more democratic participation by farmers and other stakeholders.

AB - The development of genetically engineered (GE) crops has focused predominantly on enhancing conventional pest control approaches. Scientific assessments show that these GE crops generally deliver significant economic and some environmental benefits over their conventional crop alternatives. However, emerging evidence indicates that current GE crops will not foster sustainable cropping systems unless the negative environmental and social feedback effects are properly addressed. Moreover, GE crop innovations that promote more sustainable agricultural systems will receive underinvestment by seed and chemical companies that must understandably focus on private returns for major crops. Opportunities to promote crops that convey multi-faceted benefits for the environment and the poor are foundational to a sustainable food system and should not be neglected because they also represent global public goods. In this paper, we develop a set of criteria that can guide the development of GE crops consistent with contemporary sustainable agriculture theory and practice. Based on those principles, we offer policy options and recommendations for reforming public and private R & D and commercialization processes to further the potential contributions of GE crops to sustainable agriculture. Two strategies that would help achieve this goal would be to restore the centrality of the public sector in agricultural R & D and to open the technology development process to more democratic participation by farmers and other stakeholders.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867094328&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867094328&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/su3060847

DO - 10.3390/su3060847

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 847

EP - 874

JO - Sustainability

JF - Sustainability

SN - 2071-1050

IS - 6

ER -