The threat of genes

A comment on Evan Charney's "Genes and Ideologies"

Rebecca J. Hannagan, Peter K. Hatemi

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In his essay, "Genes and Ideologies," Evan Charney wrangles with the question of the role of genes in the formation of political attitudes via a critique of Alford, Funk, and Hibbing's 2005 American Political Science Review article. Although critical evaluations are necessary, his essay falls short of what is required of a scientific critique on both empirical and theoretical grounds. We offer a comment on his essay and further contend that it is naïve to proceed on the assumption that a barrier exists between the biological and social sciences, such that the biological sciences have nothing to offer the social sciences. If we look beyond our discipline's current theoretical models we may find a more thorough, and not just competing, explanation of political behavior.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)329-335
Number of pages7
JournalPerspectives on Politics
Volume6
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2008

Fingerprint

Ideologies
threat
social science
political behavior
political attitude
political science
science
evaluation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

@article{4f8fa003f90f4475b7d1d0f9a5df8518,
title = "The threat of genes: A comment on Evan Charney's {"}Genes and Ideologies{"}",
abstract = "In his essay, {"}Genes and Ideologies,{"} Evan Charney wrangles with the question of the role of genes in the formation of political attitudes via a critique of Alford, Funk, and Hibbing's 2005 American Political Science Review article. Although critical evaluations are necessary, his essay falls short of what is required of a scientific critique on both empirical and theoretical grounds. We offer a comment on his essay and further contend that it is na{\"i}ve to proceed on the assumption that a barrier exists between the biological and social sciences, such that the biological sciences have nothing to offer the social sciences. If we look beyond our discipline's current theoretical models we may find a more thorough, and not just competing, explanation of political behavior.",
author = "Hannagan, {Rebecca J.} and Hatemi, {Peter K.}",
year = "2008",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S153759270808064X",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "329--335",
journal = "Perspectives on Politics",
issn = "1537-5927",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

The threat of genes : A comment on Evan Charney's "Genes and Ideologies". / Hannagan, Rebecca J.; Hatemi, Peter K.

In: Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 6, No. 2, 01.06.2008, p. 329-335.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

TY - JOUR

T1 - The threat of genes

T2 - A comment on Evan Charney's "Genes and Ideologies"

AU - Hannagan, Rebecca J.

AU - Hatemi, Peter K.

PY - 2008/6/1

Y1 - 2008/6/1

N2 - In his essay, "Genes and Ideologies," Evan Charney wrangles with the question of the role of genes in the formation of political attitudes via a critique of Alford, Funk, and Hibbing's 2005 American Political Science Review article. Although critical evaluations are necessary, his essay falls short of what is required of a scientific critique on both empirical and theoretical grounds. We offer a comment on his essay and further contend that it is naïve to proceed on the assumption that a barrier exists between the biological and social sciences, such that the biological sciences have nothing to offer the social sciences. If we look beyond our discipline's current theoretical models we may find a more thorough, and not just competing, explanation of political behavior.

AB - In his essay, "Genes and Ideologies," Evan Charney wrangles with the question of the role of genes in the formation of political attitudes via a critique of Alford, Funk, and Hibbing's 2005 American Political Science Review article. Although critical evaluations are necessary, his essay falls short of what is required of a scientific critique on both empirical and theoretical grounds. We offer a comment on his essay and further contend that it is naïve to proceed on the assumption that a barrier exists between the biological and social sciences, such that the biological sciences have nothing to offer the social sciences. If we look beyond our discipline's current theoretical models we may find a more thorough, and not just competing, explanation of political behavior.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=44949223393&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=44949223393&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S153759270808064X

DO - 10.1017/S153759270808064X

M3 - Comment/debate

VL - 6

SP - 329

EP - 335

JO - Perspectives on Politics

JF - Perspectives on Politics

SN - 1537-5927

IS - 2

ER -