The typical leadership study: Assumptions, implications, and potential remedies

Samuel Todd Hunter, Katrina E. Bedell-Avers, Michael D. Mumford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

148 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Since the turn of the century, the area of leadership has seen notable growth in the amount of research conducted. As such, it now seems appropriate to evaluate how most leadership research is conducted, considering in particular the assumptions that are made when conducting the typical leadership study. Specifically, we explored the assumptions made with regard to (a) subordinates, (b) leaders, (c) context, and (d) the processes involved in leadership. Consideration of these assumptions reveals a number of problems ranging from simple methodological issues to more substantive theory-based concerns. Potential remedies are presented, along with a consideration of the long-term impact associated with the typical leadership study approach.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)435-446
Number of pages12
JournalLeadership Quarterly
Volume18
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2007

Fingerprint

remedies
leadership
Research
Remedies
leader
Growth

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business and International Management
  • Applied Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

Hunter, Samuel Todd ; Bedell-Avers, Katrina E. ; Mumford, Michael D. / The typical leadership study : Assumptions, implications, and potential remedies. In: Leadership Quarterly. 2007 ; Vol. 18, No. 5. pp. 435-446.
@article{417e2e0d21574fc895cc6e1ec4e09830,
title = "The typical leadership study: Assumptions, implications, and potential remedies",
abstract = "Since the turn of the century, the area of leadership has seen notable growth in the amount of research conducted. As such, it now seems appropriate to evaluate how most leadership research is conducted, considering in particular the assumptions that are made when conducting the typical leadership study. Specifically, we explored the assumptions made with regard to (a) subordinates, (b) leaders, (c) context, and (d) the processes involved in leadership. Consideration of these assumptions reveals a number of problems ranging from simple methodological issues to more substantive theory-based concerns. Potential remedies are presented, along with a consideration of the long-term impact associated with the typical leadership study approach.",
author = "Hunter, {Samuel Todd} and Bedell-Avers, {Katrina E.} and Mumford, {Michael D.}",
year = "2007",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.07.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "435--446",
journal = "Leadership Quarterly",
issn = "1048-9843",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5",

}

The typical leadership study : Assumptions, implications, and potential remedies. / Hunter, Samuel Todd; Bedell-Avers, Katrina E.; Mumford, Michael D.

In: Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 18, No. 5, 01.10.2007, p. 435-446.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The typical leadership study

T2 - Assumptions, implications, and potential remedies

AU - Hunter, Samuel Todd

AU - Bedell-Avers, Katrina E.

AU - Mumford, Michael D.

PY - 2007/10/1

Y1 - 2007/10/1

N2 - Since the turn of the century, the area of leadership has seen notable growth in the amount of research conducted. As such, it now seems appropriate to evaluate how most leadership research is conducted, considering in particular the assumptions that are made when conducting the typical leadership study. Specifically, we explored the assumptions made with regard to (a) subordinates, (b) leaders, (c) context, and (d) the processes involved in leadership. Consideration of these assumptions reveals a number of problems ranging from simple methodological issues to more substantive theory-based concerns. Potential remedies are presented, along with a consideration of the long-term impact associated with the typical leadership study approach.

AB - Since the turn of the century, the area of leadership has seen notable growth in the amount of research conducted. As such, it now seems appropriate to evaluate how most leadership research is conducted, considering in particular the assumptions that are made when conducting the typical leadership study. Specifically, we explored the assumptions made with regard to (a) subordinates, (b) leaders, (c) context, and (d) the processes involved in leadership. Consideration of these assumptions reveals a number of problems ranging from simple methodological issues to more substantive theory-based concerns. Potential remedies are presented, along with a consideration of the long-term impact associated with the typical leadership study approach.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548324799&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548324799&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.07.001

DO - 10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.07.001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34548324799

VL - 18

SP - 435

EP - 446

JO - Leadership Quarterly

JF - Leadership Quarterly

SN - 1048-9843

IS - 5

ER -