The upside of bureaucracy

Unintended benefits for professional careers

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Introduction There is a frequent refrain from scholars and practitioners alike that the professions are becoming ever more bureaucratized. If true, what does this trend imply for professional careers? Several volumes have been devoted to the implications of bureaucratization in general, nearly all of which see it negatively from the point of view of professional workers themselves (e.g. Derber, 1982; Leicht and Fennell, 2001; Freidson, 2001). In this chapter I advance another, perhaps less obvious, interpretation: That bureaucracy offers those in professional careers the kind of career flexibility that today is welcomed. I argue that bureaucratization is (largely unintentionally) creating a range of flexible career options that were previously unavailable-and that are increasingly valued by professional workers themselves. I advance this argument using data from a multi-method study of primary care physicians. A review of the historical and current trends in professional organizations (e.g. law firms, medical practices) in the research literature shows that they are indeed becoming more bureaucratic. This process entails a greater use of formalized rules and procedures (Gert h and Mills, 1946), an d more centr alized con trol of pr ofessional activities and client relationships (Pugh et al., 1968). Some of the resulting effects on careers are straightforward. For example, bureaucracy tends to increase the demand for professionals to take on managerial roles (see Rothman and Perrucci, 1970, and Raelin, 1985).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationEmployment Relationships
Subtitle of host publicationNew models of White-Collar Work
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages223-256
Number of pages34
Volume9780521865371
ISBN (Electronic)9780511611544
ISBN (Print)9780521865371
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2008

Fingerprint

Bureaucracy
Workers
Professional organizations
Primary care physicians
Managerial roles
Law firms
Medical practice
Multi-method

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)

Cite this

Briscoe, F. S. (2008). The upside of bureaucracy: Unintended benefits for professional careers. In Employment Relationships: New models of White-Collar Work (Vol. 9780521865371, pp. 223-256). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611544.008
Briscoe, Forrest Scott. / The upside of bureaucracy : Unintended benefits for professional careers. Employment Relationships: New models of White-Collar Work. Vol. 9780521865371 Cambridge University Press, 2008. pp. 223-256
@inbook{436251bfeed247c093c2c5a090f2d836,
title = "The upside of bureaucracy: Unintended benefits for professional careers",
abstract = "Introduction There is a frequent refrain from scholars and practitioners alike that the professions are becoming ever more bureaucratized. If true, what does this trend imply for professional careers? Several volumes have been devoted to the implications of bureaucratization in general, nearly all of which see it negatively from the point of view of professional workers themselves (e.g. Derber, 1982; Leicht and Fennell, 2001; Freidson, 2001). In this chapter I advance another, perhaps less obvious, interpretation: That bureaucracy offers those in professional careers the kind of career flexibility that today is welcomed. I argue that bureaucratization is (largely unintentionally) creating a range of flexible career options that were previously unavailable-and that are increasingly valued by professional workers themselves. I advance this argument using data from a multi-method study of primary care physicians. A review of the historical and current trends in professional organizations (e.g. law firms, medical practices) in the research literature shows that they are indeed becoming more bureaucratic. This process entails a greater use of formalized rules and procedures (Gert h and Mills, 1946), an d more centr alized con trol of pr ofessional activities and client relationships (Pugh et al., 1968). Some of the resulting effects on careers are straightforward. For example, bureaucracy tends to increase the demand for professionals to take on managerial roles (see Rothman and Perrucci, 1970, and Raelin, 1985).",
author = "Briscoe, {Forrest Scott}",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511611544.008",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780521865371",
volume = "9780521865371",
pages = "223--256",
booktitle = "Employment Relationships",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Briscoe, FS 2008, The upside of bureaucracy: Unintended benefits for professional careers. in Employment Relationships: New models of White-Collar Work. vol. 9780521865371, Cambridge University Press, pp. 223-256. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611544.008

The upside of bureaucracy : Unintended benefits for professional careers. / Briscoe, Forrest Scott.

Employment Relationships: New models of White-Collar Work. Vol. 9780521865371 Cambridge University Press, 2008. p. 223-256.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - The upside of bureaucracy

T2 - Unintended benefits for professional careers

AU - Briscoe, Forrest Scott

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - Introduction There is a frequent refrain from scholars and practitioners alike that the professions are becoming ever more bureaucratized. If true, what does this trend imply for professional careers? Several volumes have been devoted to the implications of bureaucratization in general, nearly all of which see it negatively from the point of view of professional workers themselves (e.g. Derber, 1982; Leicht and Fennell, 2001; Freidson, 2001). In this chapter I advance another, perhaps less obvious, interpretation: That bureaucracy offers those in professional careers the kind of career flexibility that today is welcomed. I argue that bureaucratization is (largely unintentionally) creating a range of flexible career options that were previously unavailable-and that are increasingly valued by professional workers themselves. I advance this argument using data from a multi-method study of primary care physicians. A review of the historical and current trends in professional organizations (e.g. law firms, medical practices) in the research literature shows that they are indeed becoming more bureaucratic. This process entails a greater use of formalized rules and procedures (Gert h and Mills, 1946), an d more centr alized con trol of pr ofessional activities and client relationships (Pugh et al., 1968). Some of the resulting effects on careers are straightforward. For example, bureaucracy tends to increase the demand for professionals to take on managerial roles (see Rothman and Perrucci, 1970, and Raelin, 1985).

AB - Introduction There is a frequent refrain from scholars and practitioners alike that the professions are becoming ever more bureaucratized. If true, what does this trend imply for professional careers? Several volumes have been devoted to the implications of bureaucratization in general, nearly all of which see it negatively from the point of view of professional workers themselves (e.g. Derber, 1982; Leicht and Fennell, 2001; Freidson, 2001). In this chapter I advance another, perhaps less obvious, interpretation: That bureaucracy offers those in professional careers the kind of career flexibility that today is welcomed. I argue that bureaucratization is (largely unintentionally) creating a range of flexible career options that were previously unavailable-and that are increasingly valued by professional workers themselves. I advance this argument using data from a multi-method study of primary care physicians. A review of the historical and current trends in professional organizations (e.g. law firms, medical practices) in the research literature shows that they are indeed becoming more bureaucratic. This process entails a greater use of formalized rules and procedures (Gert h and Mills, 1946), an d more centr alized con trol of pr ofessional activities and client relationships (Pugh et al., 1968). Some of the resulting effects on careers are straightforward. For example, bureaucracy tends to increase the demand for professionals to take on managerial roles (see Rothman and Perrucci, 1970, and Raelin, 1985).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84927046727&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84927046727&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511611544.008

DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511611544.008

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780521865371

VL - 9780521865371

SP - 223

EP - 256

BT - Employment Relationships

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -

Briscoe FS. The upside of bureaucracy: Unintended benefits for professional careers. In Employment Relationships: New models of White-Collar Work. Vol. 9780521865371. Cambridge University Press. 2008. p. 223-256 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611544.008