The U.S. Border and the political ontology of "Assassination Nation": Thanatological dispositifs

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

In this article I set out to develop an alternative analysis of national borders that grants them moral and politically normative standing while at the same time showing the limits of such merely normative analytics. The aim is to develop a genealogical analysis of the U.S. border, which is taken here as an exemplar of how not to implement borders. The first section develops what will be called here the "mobile panopticon," one that colonizes the so-called heartland, making of all citizens potentially extraditable subjects. The second section argues that the assemblage of institutions that make of the border not simply a geographic marker has become deeply enmeshed with the United States' peculiar institutions of hyperpenality and criminal branding, thus leading to the expansion and exacerbation of what I have called the "ethnoracial prison industrial complex." This analysis then offers warrants for the argument that the U.S. border is no longer a neutral arbiter of sovereignty but, instead, has become a "genocidal machine." In the closing section an engagement with Casey and Watkins's recent work on the U.S. border offers a bridge to the genealogical claim that the U.S. border is in fact a thanatological dispositif.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)82-100
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Speculative Philosophy
Volume31
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Assassination
Political Ontology
Assemblages
Branding
Prison
Sovereignty
Warrants
Panopticon
Dispositif

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Philosophy

Cite this

@article{2a58c052330a4c479dff8f1cc9491d77,
title = "The U.S. Border and the political ontology of {"}Assassination Nation{"}: Thanatological dispositifs",
abstract = "In this article I set out to develop an alternative analysis of national borders that grants them moral and politically normative standing while at the same time showing the limits of such merely normative analytics. The aim is to develop a genealogical analysis of the U.S. border, which is taken here as an exemplar of how not to implement borders. The first section develops what will be called here the {"}mobile panopticon,{"} one that colonizes the so-called heartland, making of all citizens potentially extraditable subjects. The second section argues that the assemblage of institutions that make of the border not simply a geographic marker has become deeply enmeshed with the United States' peculiar institutions of hyperpenality and criminal branding, thus leading to the expansion and exacerbation of what I have called the {"}ethnoracial prison industrial complex.{"} This analysis then offers warrants for the argument that the U.S. border is no longer a neutral arbiter of sovereignty but, instead, has become a {"}genocidal machine.{"} In the closing section an engagement with Casey and Watkins's recent work on the U.S. border offers a bridge to the genealogical claim that the U.S. border is in fact a thanatological dispositif.",
author = "Eduardo Mendieta",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5325/jspecphil.31.1.0082",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "82--100",
journal = "Journal of Speculative Philosophy",
issn = "0891-625X",
publisher = "Penn State University Press",
number = "1",

}

The U.S. Border and the political ontology of "Assassination Nation" : Thanatological dispositifs. / Mendieta, Eduardo.

In: Journal of Speculative Philosophy, Vol. 31, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. 82-100.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - The U.S. Border and the political ontology of "Assassination Nation"

T2 - Thanatological dispositifs

AU - Mendieta, Eduardo

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - In this article I set out to develop an alternative analysis of national borders that grants them moral and politically normative standing while at the same time showing the limits of such merely normative analytics. The aim is to develop a genealogical analysis of the U.S. border, which is taken here as an exemplar of how not to implement borders. The first section develops what will be called here the "mobile panopticon," one that colonizes the so-called heartland, making of all citizens potentially extraditable subjects. The second section argues that the assemblage of institutions that make of the border not simply a geographic marker has become deeply enmeshed with the United States' peculiar institutions of hyperpenality and criminal branding, thus leading to the expansion and exacerbation of what I have called the "ethnoracial prison industrial complex." This analysis then offers warrants for the argument that the U.S. border is no longer a neutral arbiter of sovereignty but, instead, has become a "genocidal machine." In the closing section an engagement with Casey and Watkins's recent work on the U.S. border offers a bridge to the genealogical claim that the U.S. border is in fact a thanatological dispositif.

AB - In this article I set out to develop an alternative analysis of national borders that grants them moral and politically normative standing while at the same time showing the limits of such merely normative analytics. The aim is to develop a genealogical analysis of the U.S. border, which is taken here as an exemplar of how not to implement borders. The first section develops what will be called here the "mobile panopticon," one that colonizes the so-called heartland, making of all citizens potentially extraditable subjects. The second section argues that the assemblage of institutions that make of the border not simply a geographic marker has become deeply enmeshed with the United States' peculiar institutions of hyperpenality and criminal branding, thus leading to the expansion and exacerbation of what I have called the "ethnoracial prison industrial complex." This analysis then offers warrants for the argument that the U.S. border is no longer a neutral arbiter of sovereignty but, instead, has become a "genocidal machine." In the closing section an engagement with Casey and Watkins's recent work on the U.S. border offers a bridge to the genealogical claim that the U.S. border is in fact a thanatological dispositif.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013422180&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85013422180&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5325/jspecphil.31.1.0082

DO - 10.5325/jspecphil.31.1.0082

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85013422180

VL - 31

SP - 82

EP - 100

JO - Journal of Speculative Philosophy

JF - Journal of Speculative Philosophy

SN - 0891-625X

IS - 1

ER -