The use and abuse of diagnostic/classification criteria

Rayford June, Rohit Aggarwal

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

In rheumatic diseases, classification criteria have been developed to identify well-defined homogenous cohorts for clinical research. Although they are commonly used in clinical practice, their use may not be appropriate for routine diagnostic clinical care. Classification criteria are being revised with improved methodology and further understanding of disease pathophysiology, but they still may not encompass all unique clinical situations to be applied for diagnosis of heterogenous, rare, evolving rheumatic diseases. Diagnostic criteria development is challenging primarily due to difficulty for universal application given significant differences in the prevalence of rheumatic diseases based on geographical area and clinic settings. Despite these shortcomings, the clinician can still use classification criteria for understanding the disease as well as a guide for diagnosis with a few caveats. We present the limits of current classification criteria, their use and abuse in clinical practice, and how they should be used with caution when applied in clinics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)921-934
Number of pages14
JournalBest Practice and Research: Clinical Rheumatology
Volume28
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2014

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Rheumatology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The use and abuse of diagnostic/classification criteria'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this