The utility of a multifoci approach to the study of organizational justice: A meta-analytic investigation into the consideration of normative rules, moral accountability, bandwidth-fidelity, and social exchange

Deborah E. Rupp, Ruodan Shao, Kisha Shannon Jones, Hui Liao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

85 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Multifoci justice pulls from research on social exchange theory to argue that despite the proliferation of rule sets in the literature (often referred to as the "types" of justice), individuals seek to hold some party accountable for the violation/upholding of such rules, and it is these parties (e.g., supervisors, the organization as a whole) that are most likely to be the recipients of attitudes and behaviors (i.e., target similarity effects). To explore these issues, we meta-analytically (k= 647, N= 235,682) compared the predictive validities of source- vs. type-based justice perceptions and found that (a) multifoci justice perceptions more strongly predicted outcomes directed at matched sources than did type-based justice perceptions, (b) multifoci justice perceptions more strongly predicted target similar than dissimilar outcomes, and (c) the relationships between multifoci justice perceptions and target similar outcomes were mediated by source-specific social exchange.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)159-185
Number of pages27
JournalOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Volume123
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2014

Fingerprint

Social Responsibility
Social Justice
Social exchange
Accountability
Justice
Organizational justice
Bandwidth
Fidelity
Organizations
Research

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Applied Psychology
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

@article{147cba1f74e34b31881b7cf871b12cba,
title = "The utility of a multifoci approach to the study of organizational justice: A meta-analytic investigation into the consideration of normative rules, moral accountability, bandwidth-fidelity, and social exchange",
abstract = "Multifoci justice pulls from research on social exchange theory to argue that despite the proliferation of rule sets in the literature (often referred to as the {"}types{"} of justice), individuals seek to hold some party accountable for the violation/upholding of such rules, and it is these parties (e.g., supervisors, the organization as a whole) that are most likely to be the recipients of attitudes and behaviors (i.e., target similarity effects). To explore these issues, we meta-analytically (k= 647, N= 235,682) compared the predictive validities of source- vs. type-based justice perceptions and found that (a) multifoci justice perceptions more strongly predicted outcomes directed at matched sources than did type-based justice perceptions, (b) multifoci justice perceptions more strongly predicted target similar than dissimilar outcomes, and (c) the relationships between multifoci justice perceptions and target similar outcomes were mediated by source-specific social exchange.",
author = "Rupp, {Deborah E.} and Ruodan Shao and Jones, {Kisha Shannon} and Hui Liao",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.10.011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "123",
pages = "159--185",
journal = "Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes",
issn = "0749-5978",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The utility of a multifoci approach to the study of organizational justice

T2 - A meta-analytic investigation into the consideration of normative rules, moral accountability, bandwidth-fidelity, and social exchange

AU - Rupp, Deborah E.

AU - Shao, Ruodan

AU - Jones, Kisha Shannon

AU - Liao, Hui

PY - 2014/3/1

Y1 - 2014/3/1

N2 - Multifoci justice pulls from research on social exchange theory to argue that despite the proliferation of rule sets in the literature (often referred to as the "types" of justice), individuals seek to hold some party accountable for the violation/upholding of such rules, and it is these parties (e.g., supervisors, the organization as a whole) that are most likely to be the recipients of attitudes and behaviors (i.e., target similarity effects). To explore these issues, we meta-analytically (k= 647, N= 235,682) compared the predictive validities of source- vs. type-based justice perceptions and found that (a) multifoci justice perceptions more strongly predicted outcomes directed at matched sources than did type-based justice perceptions, (b) multifoci justice perceptions more strongly predicted target similar than dissimilar outcomes, and (c) the relationships between multifoci justice perceptions and target similar outcomes were mediated by source-specific social exchange.

AB - Multifoci justice pulls from research on social exchange theory to argue that despite the proliferation of rule sets in the literature (often referred to as the "types" of justice), individuals seek to hold some party accountable for the violation/upholding of such rules, and it is these parties (e.g., supervisors, the organization as a whole) that are most likely to be the recipients of attitudes and behaviors (i.e., target similarity effects). To explore these issues, we meta-analytically (k= 647, N= 235,682) compared the predictive validities of source- vs. type-based justice perceptions and found that (a) multifoci justice perceptions more strongly predicted outcomes directed at matched sources than did type-based justice perceptions, (b) multifoci justice perceptions more strongly predicted target similar than dissimilar outcomes, and (c) the relationships between multifoci justice perceptions and target similar outcomes were mediated by source-specific social exchange.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892696940&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892696940&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.10.011

DO - 10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.10.011

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84892696940

VL - 123

SP - 159

EP - 185

JO - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

JF - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

SN - 0749-5978

IS - 2

ER -