The utility of situational theory of publics for assessing public response to a disaster prediction

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The study of public response to disasters is a relatively recent discipline that developed following the passage of the Earthquake Hazards Reduction Act of 1977. Because earthquake prediction is an inexact science, few formal predictions have been issued, which has limited the opportunity to study public response to predictions. The purpose of this study was to examine the utility of public relations theory, specifically situational theory of publics, for assessing response to the New Madrid earthquake prediction. Situational theory demonstrates that there is not a single, general public for disaster predictions as has been assumed in studies of disaster response. Instead, multiple publics develop in response to a prediction based on how members of those publics view the situation. Contrary to previous findings that believability and personalized risk are correlated constructs, high personalized risk was associated with high constraint recognition regardless of belief in the prediction. Based on the findings, suggestions are proposed for the development of more effective messages for communicating with publics at risk.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)489-508
Number of pages20
JournalPublic Relations Review
Volume24
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1998

Fingerprint

Disasters
disaster
Earthquakes
natural disaster
Public relations
Disaster
Prediction
Hazards
act
science
Earthquake

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Communication
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Marketing

Cite this

@article{90ba2523ba8746d09060c8d879a1ccb6,
title = "The utility of situational theory of publics for assessing public response to a disaster prediction",
abstract = "The study of public response to disasters is a relatively recent discipline that developed following the passage of the Earthquake Hazards Reduction Act of 1977. Because earthquake prediction is an inexact science, few formal predictions have been issued, which has limited the opportunity to study public response to predictions. The purpose of this study was to examine the utility of public relations theory, specifically situational theory of publics, for assessing response to the New Madrid earthquake prediction. Situational theory demonstrates that there is not a single, general public for disaster predictions as has been assumed in studies of disaster response. Instead, multiple publics develop in response to a prediction based on how members of those publics view the situation. Contrary to previous findings that believability and personalized risk are correlated constructs, high personalized risk was associated with high constraint recognition regardless of belief in the prediction. Based on the findings, suggestions are proposed for the development of more effective messages for communicating with publics at risk.",
author = "Major, {Ann Marie}",
year = "1998",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0363-8111(99)80113-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "489--508",
journal = "Public Relations Review",
issn = "0363-8111",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "4",

}

The utility of situational theory of publics for assessing public response to a disaster prediction. / Major, Ann Marie.

In: Public Relations Review, Vol. 24, No. 4, 01.01.1998, p. 489-508.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The utility of situational theory of publics for assessing public response to a disaster prediction

AU - Major, Ann Marie

PY - 1998/1/1

Y1 - 1998/1/1

N2 - The study of public response to disasters is a relatively recent discipline that developed following the passage of the Earthquake Hazards Reduction Act of 1977. Because earthquake prediction is an inexact science, few formal predictions have been issued, which has limited the opportunity to study public response to predictions. The purpose of this study was to examine the utility of public relations theory, specifically situational theory of publics, for assessing response to the New Madrid earthquake prediction. Situational theory demonstrates that there is not a single, general public for disaster predictions as has been assumed in studies of disaster response. Instead, multiple publics develop in response to a prediction based on how members of those publics view the situation. Contrary to previous findings that believability and personalized risk are correlated constructs, high personalized risk was associated with high constraint recognition regardless of belief in the prediction. Based on the findings, suggestions are proposed for the development of more effective messages for communicating with publics at risk.

AB - The study of public response to disasters is a relatively recent discipline that developed following the passage of the Earthquake Hazards Reduction Act of 1977. Because earthquake prediction is an inexact science, few formal predictions have been issued, which has limited the opportunity to study public response to predictions. The purpose of this study was to examine the utility of public relations theory, specifically situational theory of publics, for assessing response to the New Madrid earthquake prediction. Situational theory demonstrates that there is not a single, general public for disaster predictions as has been assumed in studies of disaster response. Instead, multiple publics develop in response to a prediction based on how members of those publics view the situation. Contrary to previous findings that believability and personalized risk are correlated constructs, high personalized risk was associated with high constraint recognition regardless of belief in the prediction. Based on the findings, suggestions are proposed for the development of more effective messages for communicating with publics at risk.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032346381&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032346381&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0363-8111(99)80113-1

DO - 10.1016/S0363-8111(99)80113-1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0032346381

VL - 24

SP - 489

EP - 508

JO - Public Relations Review

JF - Public Relations Review

SN - 0363-8111

IS - 4

ER -