The volunteer's dilemma and the optimal size of a social group

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

If one or few individuals are enough to perform an action that produces a collective good and if this action has a cost, living in group can be beneficial because the cost can be shared with other individuals. Without coordination, however, the production of a collective good by the contribution of one or few individuals is inefficient and can be modelled as a volunteer's dilemma. In the volunteer's dilemma the individuals that pay the cost for the production of the collective good benefit from their action if nobody else volunteers, but the cost is wasted if too many individuals volunteer. Increasing group size reduces the need of volunteering for each member of the group; the overall benefit for the group, however, decreases too because the larger the group is, the less likely it is that the collective good is produced. This problem persists even with a high degree of relatedness between group members; an optimal, intermediate group size exists that maximizes the probability to produce the collective good.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)475-480
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Theoretical Biology
Volume261
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 7 2009

Fingerprint

Dilemma
volunteers
Volunteers
Costs and Cost Analysis
group size
Costs
volunteerism
production costs
Economics
Maximise
Likely
Decrease

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Statistics and Probability
  • Modeling and Simulation
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Immunology and Microbiology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Applied Mathematics

Cite this

@article{1316d6b55abd4bad9b4dae021c5819c4,
title = "The volunteer's dilemma and the optimal size of a social group",
abstract = "If one or few individuals are enough to perform an action that produces a collective good and if this action has a cost, living in group can be beneficial because the cost can be shared with other individuals. Without coordination, however, the production of a collective good by the contribution of one or few individuals is inefficient and can be modelled as a volunteer's dilemma. In the volunteer's dilemma the individuals that pay the cost for the production of the collective good benefit from their action if nobody else volunteers, but the cost is wasted if too many individuals volunteer. Increasing group size reduces the need of volunteering for each member of the group; the overall benefit for the group, however, decreases too because the larger the group is, the less likely it is that the collective good is produced. This problem persists even with a high degree of relatedness between group members; an optimal, intermediate group size exists that maximizes the probability to produce the collective good.",
author = "Marco Archetti",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.08.018",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "261",
pages = "475--480",
journal = "Journal of Theoretical Biology",
issn = "0022-5193",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "3",

}

The volunteer's dilemma and the optimal size of a social group. / Archetti, Marco.

In: Journal of Theoretical Biology, Vol. 261, No. 3, 07.12.2009, p. 475-480.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The volunteer's dilemma and the optimal size of a social group

AU - Archetti, Marco

PY - 2009/12/7

Y1 - 2009/12/7

N2 - If one or few individuals are enough to perform an action that produces a collective good and if this action has a cost, living in group can be beneficial because the cost can be shared with other individuals. Without coordination, however, the production of a collective good by the contribution of one or few individuals is inefficient and can be modelled as a volunteer's dilemma. In the volunteer's dilemma the individuals that pay the cost for the production of the collective good benefit from their action if nobody else volunteers, but the cost is wasted if too many individuals volunteer. Increasing group size reduces the need of volunteering for each member of the group; the overall benefit for the group, however, decreases too because the larger the group is, the less likely it is that the collective good is produced. This problem persists even with a high degree of relatedness between group members; an optimal, intermediate group size exists that maximizes the probability to produce the collective good.

AB - If one or few individuals are enough to perform an action that produces a collective good and if this action has a cost, living in group can be beneficial because the cost can be shared with other individuals. Without coordination, however, the production of a collective good by the contribution of one or few individuals is inefficient and can be modelled as a volunteer's dilemma. In the volunteer's dilemma the individuals that pay the cost for the production of the collective good benefit from their action if nobody else volunteers, but the cost is wasted if too many individuals volunteer. Increasing group size reduces the need of volunteering for each member of the group; the overall benefit for the group, however, decreases too because the larger the group is, the less likely it is that the collective good is produced. This problem persists even with a high degree of relatedness between group members; an optimal, intermediate group size exists that maximizes the probability to produce the collective good.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70350057091&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70350057091&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.08.018

DO - 10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.08.018

M3 - Article

C2 - 19703470

AN - SCOPUS:70350057091

VL - 261

SP - 475

EP - 480

JO - Journal of Theoretical Biology

JF - Journal of Theoretical Biology

SN - 0022-5193

IS - 3

ER -