The who, when, and where of unethical choices: A meta-analysis

Jennifer Kish Gephart, David A. Harrison, Linda Klebe Trevino

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

Substantive concern and academic research about business ethics has reached a crescendo. Yet, researchers still do not have an authoritative, cumulative understanding of what causes (un)ethical decisions and behavior in organizational settings. In this meta-analysis, we draw from multiple literatures and resources to answer questions about the who, when, and where of unethical choices. Our findings show that individuals higher in cognitive moral development, lower in Machiavellianism, with a more internal locus of control, a less relativistic moral philosophy, and higher job satisfaction are less likely to plan and enact such choices. When issues involve high moral intensity such choices are also suppressed. Where organizations have benevolent climates, strong ethical cultures, and (enforced) codes of conduct, fewer unethical choices occur. Intriguingly, most of these influences are stronger for behavior than intention, suggesting a non-conscious or intuitive path for (un)ethical decisions that has seen much less investigation in the behavioral ethics literature. These results and ideas should serve as a databased foundation for the behavioral ethics field as well as a guide to organizations who want to do well by doing good.

Original languageEnglish (US)
StatePublished - Dec 1 2007
Event67th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2007 - Philadelphia, PA, United States
Duration: Aug 3 2007Aug 8 2007

Other

Other67th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2007
CountryUnited States
CityPhiladelphia, PA
Period8/3/078/8/07

Fingerprint

Job satisfaction
Industry
Meta-analysis
Business ethics
Codes of conduct
Moral philosophy
Locus of control
Machiavellianism
Climate
Ethical culture
Cognitive moral development
Academic research
Resources
Moral intensity

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Management Information Systems
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

Gephart, J. K., Harrison, D. A., & Trevino, L. K. (2007). The who, when, and where of unethical choices: A meta-analysis. Paper presented at 67th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2007, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Gephart, Jennifer Kish ; Harrison, David A. ; Trevino, Linda Klebe. / The who, when, and where of unethical choices : A meta-analysis. Paper presented at 67th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2007, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
@conference{1b285ec19a064426968cef6af93a35f2,
title = "The who, when, and where of unethical choices: A meta-analysis",
abstract = "Substantive concern and academic research about business ethics has reached a crescendo. Yet, researchers still do not have an authoritative, cumulative understanding of what causes (un)ethical decisions and behavior in organizational settings. In this meta-analysis, we draw from multiple literatures and resources to answer questions about the who, when, and where of unethical choices. Our findings show that individuals higher in cognitive moral development, lower in Machiavellianism, with a more internal locus of control, a less relativistic moral philosophy, and higher job satisfaction are less likely to plan and enact such choices. When issues involve high moral intensity such choices are also suppressed. Where organizations have benevolent climates, strong ethical cultures, and (enforced) codes of conduct, fewer unethical choices occur. Intriguingly, most of these influences are stronger for behavior than intention, suggesting a non-conscious or intuitive path for (un)ethical decisions that has seen much less investigation in the behavioral ethics literature. These results and ideas should serve as a databased foundation for the behavioral ethics field as well as a guide to organizations who want to do well by doing good.",
author = "Gephart, {Jennifer Kish} and Harrison, {David A.} and Trevino, {Linda Klebe}",
year = "2007",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
note = "67th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2007 ; Conference date: 03-08-2007 Through 08-08-2007",

}

Gephart, JK, Harrison, DA & Trevino, LK 2007, 'The who, when, and where of unethical choices: A meta-analysis', Paper presented at 67th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2007, Philadelphia, PA, United States, 8/3/07 - 8/8/07.

The who, when, and where of unethical choices : A meta-analysis. / Gephart, Jennifer Kish; Harrison, David A.; Trevino, Linda Klebe.

2007. Paper presented at 67th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2007, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

TY - CONF

T1 - The who, when, and where of unethical choices

T2 - A meta-analysis

AU - Gephart, Jennifer Kish

AU - Harrison, David A.

AU - Trevino, Linda Klebe

PY - 2007/12/1

Y1 - 2007/12/1

N2 - Substantive concern and academic research about business ethics has reached a crescendo. Yet, researchers still do not have an authoritative, cumulative understanding of what causes (un)ethical decisions and behavior in organizational settings. In this meta-analysis, we draw from multiple literatures and resources to answer questions about the who, when, and where of unethical choices. Our findings show that individuals higher in cognitive moral development, lower in Machiavellianism, with a more internal locus of control, a less relativistic moral philosophy, and higher job satisfaction are less likely to plan and enact such choices. When issues involve high moral intensity such choices are also suppressed. Where organizations have benevolent climates, strong ethical cultures, and (enforced) codes of conduct, fewer unethical choices occur. Intriguingly, most of these influences are stronger for behavior than intention, suggesting a non-conscious or intuitive path for (un)ethical decisions that has seen much less investigation in the behavioral ethics literature. These results and ideas should serve as a databased foundation for the behavioral ethics field as well as a guide to organizations who want to do well by doing good.

AB - Substantive concern and academic research about business ethics has reached a crescendo. Yet, researchers still do not have an authoritative, cumulative understanding of what causes (un)ethical decisions and behavior in organizational settings. In this meta-analysis, we draw from multiple literatures and resources to answer questions about the who, when, and where of unethical choices. Our findings show that individuals higher in cognitive moral development, lower in Machiavellianism, with a more internal locus of control, a less relativistic moral philosophy, and higher job satisfaction are less likely to plan and enact such choices. When issues involve high moral intensity such choices are also suppressed. Where organizations have benevolent climates, strong ethical cultures, and (enforced) codes of conduct, fewer unethical choices occur. Intriguingly, most of these influences are stronger for behavior than intention, suggesting a non-conscious or intuitive path for (un)ethical decisions that has seen much less investigation in the behavioral ethics literature. These results and ideas should serve as a databased foundation for the behavioral ethics field as well as a guide to organizations who want to do well by doing good.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858421500&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84858421500&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Paper

AN - SCOPUS:84858421500

ER -

Gephart JK, Harrison DA, Trevino LK. The who, when, and where of unethical choices: A meta-analysis. 2007. Paper presented at 67th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2007, Philadelphia, PA, United States.