The working alliance

A comparison of two therapies

Patrick J. Raue, Louis Georges Castonguay, Marvin R. Goldfried

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

45 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Alliance ratings of single significant sessions of cognitive-behavioral and psychodynamic-interpersonal therapies were compared using the observer form of the Working Alliance Inventory (WAI-O). Eighteen cognitive-behavioral and 13 psychodynamic-interpersonal therapists, nominated by experts in the field, participated in the study. Results indicate significantly higher total alliance scores for cognitive-behavioral sessions, and greater variability in alliance for psychodynamic-interpersonal sessions. In addition, SCL-90 scores were negatively correlated with the alliance solely in psychodynamic therapy, indicating that more symptomatic patients may have greater difficulty with the work required in this kind of therapy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)197-207
Number of pages11
JournalPsychotherapy Research
Volume3
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1993

Fingerprint

Therapeutics
Equipment and Supplies

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Raue, Patrick J. ; Castonguay, Louis Georges ; Goldfried, Marvin R. / The working alliance : A comparison of two therapies. In: Psychotherapy Research. 1993 ; Vol. 3, No. 3. pp. 197-207.
@article{817b4894f6644992a05216aed68263c7,
title = "The working alliance: A comparison of two therapies",
abstract = "Alliance ratings of single significant sessions of cognitive-behavioral and psychodynamic-interpersonal therapies were compared using the observer form of the Working Alliance Inventory (WAI-O). Eighteen cognitive-behavioral and 13 psychodynamic-interpersonal therapists, nominated by experts in the field, participated in the study. Results indicate significantly higher total alliance scores for cognitive-behavioral sessions, and greater variability in alliance for psychodynamic-interpersonal sessions. In addition, SCL-90 scores were negatively correlated with the alliance solely in psychodynamic therapy, indicating that more symptomatic patients may have greater difficulty with the work required in this kind of therapy.",
author = "Raue, {Patrick J.} and Castonguay, {Louis Georges} and Goldfried, {Marvin R.}",
year = "1993",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10503309312331333789",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "197--207",
journal = "Psychotherapy Research",
issn = "1050-3307",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

The working alliance : A comparison of two therapies. / Raue, Patrick J.; Castonguay, Louis Georges; Goldfried, Marvin R.

In: Psychotherapy Research, Vol. 3, No. 3, 01.01.1993, p. 197-207.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The working alliance

T2 - A comparison of two therapies

AU - Raue, Patrick J.

AU - Castonguay, Louis Georges

AU - Goldfried, Marvin R.

PY - 1993/1/1

Y1 - 1993/1/1

N2 - Alliance ratings of single significant sessions of cognitive-behavioral and psychodynamic-interpersonal therapies were compared using the observer form of the Working Alliance Inventory (WAI-O). Eighteen cognitive-behavioral and 13 psychodynamic-interpersonal therapists, nominated by experts in the field, participated in the study. Results indicate significantly higher total alliance scores for cognitive-behavioral sessions, and greater variability in alliance for psychodynamic-interpersonal sessions. In addition, SCL-90 scores were negatively correlated with the alliance solely in psychodynamic therapy, indicating that more symptomatic patients may have greater difficulty with the work required in this kind of therapy.

AB - Alliance ratings of single significant sessions of cognitive-behavioral and psychodynamic-interpersonal therapies were compared using the observer form of the Working Alliance Inventory (WAI-O). Eighteen cognitive-behavioral and 13 psychodynamic-interpersonal therapists, nominated by experts in the field, participated in the study. Results indicate significantly higher total alliance scores for cognitive-behavioral sessions, and greater variability in alliance for psychodynamic-interpersonal sessions. In addition, SCL-90 scores were negatively correlated with the alliance solely in psychodynamic therapy, indicating that more symptomatic patients may have greater difficulty with the work required in this kind of therapy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000818535&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0000818535&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10503309312331333789

DO - 10.1080/10503309312331333789

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 197

EP - 207

JO - Psychotherapy Research

JF - Psychotherapy Research

SN - 1050-3307

IS - 3

ER -