Therapeutic alliance, empathy, and genuineness in individual adult psychotherapy: A meta-analytic review

Jacob B. Nienhuis, Jesse Owen, Jeffrey C. Valentine, Stephanie Winkeljohn Black, Tyler C. Halford, Stephanie E. Parazak, Stephanie Budge, Mark Hilsenroth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Alliance, empathy, and genuineness are each integral parts of the therapeutic relationship. No previous meta-analysis has explored the extent to which therapist empathy and genuineness contribute to the therapeutic alliance. Method: In this meta-analysis, a multifaceted search strategy yielded 53 studies. Forty studies reported alliance/empathy relationships, eight studies reported alliance/genuineness relationships, and five studies reported both. Results: Random effects meta-analyses revealed that therapeutic alliance was significantly related to perceptions of therapist empathy with a mean r = 0.50 (95% CI = 0.42, 0.57). Therapeutic alliance was also significantly related to perceptions of therapist genuineness with a mean r = 0.59 (95% CI = 0.45, 0.71). Tests of publication bias indicated a low likelihood of publication bias affecting the strength and direction of the results. Potential moderating variables were explored, including rater perspective, measure of therapeutic relationship variables, and client race/ethnicity. Conclusions: Therapeutic alliance has a moderate relationship with perceptions of therapist empathy and genuineness. Of note, there may be reason to believe that when rated by the same person, these constructs have significant overlap and lack discreteness. Future directions for study of the therapeutic relationship are discussed. Implications for practice are provided.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)593-605
Number of pages13
JournalPsychotherapy Research
Volume28
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 4 2018

Fingerprint

Psychotherapy
Meta-Analysis
Publication Bias
Therapeutics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Nienhuis, Jacob B. ; Owen, Jesse ; Valentine, Jeffrey C. ; Winkeljohn Black, Stephanie ; Halford, Tyler C. ; Parazak, Stephanie E. ; Budge, Stephanie ; Hilsenroth, Mark. / Therapeutic alliance, empathy, and genuineness in individual adult psychotherapy : A meta-analytic review. In: Psychotherapy Research. 2018 ; Vol. 28, No. 4. pp. 593-605.
@article{c8718a8a3afc480493438a14424ecfa1,
title = "Therapeutic alliance, empathy, and genuineness in individual adult psychotherapy: A meta-analytic review",
abstract = "Objective: Alliance, empathy, and genuineness are each integral parts of the therapeutic relationship. No previous meta-analysis has explored the extent to which therapist empathy and genuineness contribute to the therapeutic alliance. Method: In this meta-analysis, a multifaceted search strategy yielded 53 studies. Forty studies reported alliance/empathy relationships, eight studies reported alliance/genuineness relationships, and five studies reported both. Results: Random effects meta-analyses revealed that therapeutic alliance was significantly related to perceptions of therapist empathy with a mean r = 0.50 (95{\%} CI = 0.42, 0.57). Therapeutic alliance was also significantly related to perceptions of therapist genuineness with a mean r = 0.59 (95{\%} CI = 0.45, 0.71). Tests of publication bias indicated a low likelihood of publication bias affecting the strength and direction of the results. Potential moderating variables were explored, including rater perspective, measure of therapeutic relationship variables, and client race/ethnicity. Conclusions: Therapeutic alliance has a moderate relationship with perceptions of therapist empathy and genuineness. Of note, there may be reason to believe that when rated by the same person, these constructs have significant overlap and lack discreteness. Future directions for study of the therapeutic relationship are discussed. Implications for practice are provided.",
author = "Nienhuis, {Jacob B.} and Jesse Owen and Valentine, {Jeffrey C.} and {Winkeljohn Black}, Stephanie and Halford, {Tyler C.} and Parazak, {Stephanie E.} and Stephanie Budge and Mark Hilsenroth",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/10503307.2016.1204023",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "593--605",
journal = "Psychotherapy Research",
issn = "1050-3307",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

Nienhuis, JB, Owen, J, Valentine, JC, Winkeljohn Black, S, Halford, TC, Parazak, SE, Budge, S & Hilsenroth, M 2018, 'Therapeutic alliance, empathy, and genuineness in individual adult psychotherapy: A meta-analytic review', Psychotherapy Research, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 593-605. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2016.1204023

Therapeutic alliance, empathy, and genuineness in individual adult psychotherapy : A meta-analytic review. / Nienhuis, Jacob B.; Owen, Jesse; Valentine, Jeffrey C.; Winkeljohn Black, Stephanie; Halford, Tyler C.; Parazak, Stephanie E.; Budge, Stephanie; Hilsenroth, Mark.

In: Psychotherapy Research, Vol. 28, No. 4, 04.07.2018, p. 593-605.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Therapeutic alliance, empathy, and genuineness in individual adult psychotherapy

T2 - A meta-analytic review

AU - Nienhuis, Jacob B.

AU - Owen, Jesse

AU - Valentine, Jeffrey C.

AU - Winkeljohn Black, Stephanie

AU - Halford, Tyler C.

AU - Parazak, Stephanie E.

AU - Budge, Stephanie

AU - Hilsenroth, Mark

PY - 2018/7/4

Y1 - 2018/7/4

N2 - Objective: Alliance, empathy, and genuineness are each integral parts of the therapeutic relationship. No previous meta-analysis has explored the extent to which therapist empathy and genuineness contribute to the therapeutic alliance. Method: In this meta-analysis, a multifaceted search strategy yielded 53 studies. Forty studies reported alliance/empathy relationships, eight studies reported alliance/genuineness relationships, and five studies reported both. Results: Random effects meta-analyses revealed that therapeutic alliance was significantly related to perceptions of therapist empathy with a mean r = 0.50 (95% CI = 0.42, 0.57). Therapeutic alliance was also significantly related to perceptions of therapist genuineness with a mean r = 0.59 (95% CI = 0.45, 0.71). Tests of publication bias indicated a low likelihood of publication bias affecting the strength and direction of the results. Potential moderating variables were explored, including rater perspective, measure of therapeutic relationship variables, and client race/ethnicity. Conclusions: Therapeutic alliance has a moderate relationship with perceptions of therapist empathy and genuineness. Of note, there may be reason to believe that when rated by the same person, these constructs have significant overlap and lack discreteness. Future directions for study of the therapeutic relationship are discussed. Implications for practice are provided.

AB - Objective: Alliance, empathy, and genuineness are each integral parts of the therapeutic relationship. No previous meta-analysis has explored the extent to which therapist empathy and genuineness contribute to the therapeutic alliance. Method: In this meta-analysis, a multifaceted search strategy yielded 53 studies. Forty studies reported alliance/empathy relationships, eight studies reported alliance/genuineness relationships, and five studies reported both. Results: Random effects meta-analyses revealed that therapeutic alliance was significantly related to perceptions of therapist empathy with a mean r = 0.50 (95% CI = 0.42, 0.57). Therapeutic alliance was also significantly related to perceptions of therapist genuineness with a mean r = 0.59 (95% CI = 0.45, 0.71). Tests of publication bias indicated a low likelihood of publication bias affecting the strength and direction of the results. Potential moderating variables were explored, including rater perspective, measure of therapeutic relationship variables, and client race/ethnicity. Conclusions: Therapeutic alliance has a moderate relationship with perceptions of therapist empathy and genuineness. Of note, there may be reason to believe that when rated by the same person, these constructs have significant overlap and lack discreteness. Future directions for study of the therapeutic relationship are discussed. Implications for practice are provided.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978977067&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84978977067&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10503307.2016.1204023

DO - 10.1080/10503307.2016.1204023

M3 - Article

C2 - 27389666

AN - SCOPUS:84978977067

VL - 28

SP - 593

EP - 605

JO - Psychotherapy Research

JF - Psychotherapy Research

SN - 1050-3307

IS - 4

ER -