Thick Description as Pedagogical Tool

Considering Bowers’ Inspiration for Our Work

Jonathan T. Bell, Mark Thomas Kissling

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article begins with deep appreciation of Chet Bowers’ powerful charge to take up thick description as a pedagogical tool, while also acknowledging the unpleasant manner in which he offered this charge in response to Gruenewald’s notion of a critical pedagogy of place. The article, then, prompted by Bowers’ charge, is a story and analysis of our ‘rush of descriptions’ about a controversial issue in the community where we reside. To better understand how thick description might contribute to EcoJustice pedagogy we present excerpts of our rush of descriptions and analyze them using Bowers’ 5 themes of language, commodification, tradition, science, and technology. In doing so, we found that our in-depth examination does, indeed, make apparent these themes, suggesting thick description could be a promising component of EcoJustice pedagogy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalEducational Studies - AESA
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

examination
language
science
community

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{0877233f501340eda2c9a5892e008e1a,
title = "Thick Description as Pedagogical Tool: Considering Bowers’ Inspiration for Our Work",
abstract = "This article begins with deep appreciation of Chet Bowers’ powerful charge to take up thick description as a pedagogical tool, while also acknowledging the unpleasant manner in which he offered this charge in response to Gruenewald’s notion of a critical pedagogy of place. The article, then, prompted by Bowers’ charge, is a story and analysis of our ‘rush of descriptions’ about a controversial issue in the community where we reside. To better understand how thick description might contribute to EcoJustice pedagogy we present excerpts of our rush of descriptions and analyze them using Bowers’ 5 themes of language, commodification, tradition, science, and technology. In doing so, we found that our in-depth examination does, indeed, make apparent these themes, suggesting thick description could be a promising component of EcoJustice pedagogy.",
author = "Bell, {Jonathan T.} and Kissling, {Mark Thomas}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/00131946.2019.1628762",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Educational Studies - AESA",
issn = "0013-1946",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",

}

Thick Description as Pedagogical Tool : Considering Bowers’ Inspiration for Our Work. / Bell, Jonathan T.; Kissling, Mark Thomas.

In: Educational Studies - AESA, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Thick Description as Pedagogical Tool

T2 - Considering Bowers’ Inspiration for Our Work

AU - Bell, Jonathan T.

AU - Kissling, Mark Thomas

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - This article begins with deep appreciation of Chet Bowers’ powerful charge to take up thick description as a pedagogical tool, while also acknowledging the unpleasant manner in which he offered this charge in response to Gruenewald’s notion of a critical pedagogy of place. The article, then, prompted by Bowers’ charge, is a story and analysis of our ‘rush of descriptions’ about a controversial issue in the community where we reside. To better understand how thick description might contribute to EcoJustice pedagogy we present excerpts of our rush of descriptions and analyze them using Bowers’ 5 themes of language, commodification, tradition, science, and technology. In doing so, we found that our in-depth examination does, indeed, make apparent these themes, suggesting thick description could be a promising component of EcoJustice pedagogy.

AB - This article begins with deep appreciation of Chet Bowers’ powerful charge to take up thick description as a pedagogical tool, while also acknowledging the unpleasant manner in which he offered this charge in response to Gruenewald’s notion of a critical pedagogy of place. The article, then, prompted by Bowers’ charge, is a story and analysis of our ‘rush of descriptions’ about a controversial issue in the community where we reside. To better understand how thick description might contribute to EcoJustice pedagogy we present excerpts of our rush of descriptions and analyze them using Bowers’ 5 themes of language, commodification, tradition, science, and technology. In doing so, we found that our in-depth examination does, indeed, make apparent these themes, suggesting thick description could be a promising component of EcoJustice pedagogy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068699249&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068699249&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00131946.2019.1628762

DO - 10.1080/00131946.2019.1628762

M3 - Article

JO - Educational Studies - AESA

JF - Educational Studies - AESA

SN - 0013-1946

ER -