Through a glass darkly: Afrocentrism, war, and world politics

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

While the two dominant Eurocentric paradigms of world politics, realism and idealism, place greater emphasis on power and regime type, respectively, in their analyses of war, a recently promulgated Afrocentric paradigm of world politics suggests that cultural characteristics of states are significantly associated with the likelihood of interstate war. Drawing on these competing perspectives, I conduct a data analysis of the relationship between cultural homogeneity and interstate conflict in order to determine the extent to which Afrocentric theses on international conflict are borne out empirically. I find that cultural factors are significant correlates of interstate war as Afrocentrists suggest, although realist and idealist factors are more strongly associated with the likelihood of interstate war. In addition, the findings suggest that multiculturalism—especially ethnic diversity—is a more auspicious path for interstate peace.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)203-223
Number of pages21
JournalNew Political Science
Volume23
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001

Fingerprint

world politics
paradigm
international conflict
idealism
cultural factors
realism
peace
data analysis
regime

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{4325cc93872b42b89cb3a0dab5f16ccb,
title = "Through a glass darkly: Afrocentrism, war, and world politics",
abstract = "While the two dominant Eurocentric paradigms of world politics, realism and idealism, place greater emphasis on power and regime type, respectively, in their analyses of war, a recently promulgated Afrocentric paradigm of world politics suggests that cultural characteristics of states are significantly associated with the likelihood of interstate war. Drawing on these competing perspectives, I conduct a data analysis of the relationship between cultural homogeneity and interstate conflict in order to determine the extent to which Afrocentric theses on international conflict are borne out empirically. I find that cultural factors are significant correlates of interstate war as Afrocentrists suggest, although realist and idealist factors are more strongly associated with the likelihood of interstate war. In addition, the findings suggest that multiculturalism—especially ethnic diversity—is a more auspicious path for interstate peace.",
author = "Henderson, {Errol Anthony}",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/07393140120054038",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "203--223",
journal = "New Political Science",
issn = "0739-3148",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

Through a glass darkly : Afrocentrism, war, and world politics. / Henderson, Errol Anthony.

In: New Political Science, Vol. 23, No. 2, 01.01.2001, p. 203-223.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Through a glass darkly

T2 - Afrocentrism, war, and world politics

AU - Henderson, Errol Anthony

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - While the two dominant Eurocentric paradigms of world politics, realism and idealism, place greater emphasis on power and regime type, respectively, in their analyses of war, a recently promulgated Afrocentric paradigm of world politics suggests that cultural characteristics of states are significantly associated with the likelihood of interstate war. Drawing on these competing perspectives, I conduct a data analysis of the relationship between cultural homogeneity and interstate conflict in order to determine the extent to which Afrocentric theses on international conflict are borne out empirically. I find that cultural factors are significant correlates of interstate war as Afrocentrists suggest, although realist and idealist factors are more strongly associated with the likelihood of interstate war. In addition, the findings suggest that multiculturalism—especially ethnic diversity—is a more auspicious path for interstate peace.

AB - While the two dominant Eurocentric paradigms of world politics, realism and idealism, place greater emphasis on power and regime type, respectively, in their analyses of war, a recently promulgated Afrocentric paradigm of world politics suggests that cultural characteristics of states are significantly associated with the likelihood of interstate war. Drawing on these competing perspectives, I conduct a data analysis of the relationship between cultural homogeneity and interstate conflict in order to determine the extent to which Afrocentric theses on international conflict are borne out empirically. I find that cultural factors are significant correlates of interstate war as Afrocentrists suggest, although realist and idealist factors are more strongly associated with the likelihood of interstate war. In addition, the findings suggest that multiculturalism—especially ethnic diversity—is a more auspicious path for interstate peace.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071217447&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071217447&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/07393140120054038

DO - 10.1080/07393140120054038

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85071217447

VL - 23

SP - 203

EP - 223

JO - New Political Science

JF - New Political Science

SN - 0739-3148

IS - 2

ER -