Through the looking glass: Viewing first-year composition through the lens of information literacy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper presents a case study of how librarians can situate themselves as pedagogical partners by bringing their unique information literacy perspective and expertise to the programmatic assessment process. This report resulted from the Thun Library and the Penn State Berks Composition Program's collaboration to assess the institution’s first-year composition (FYC) course. From previous programmatic assessments of their students’ work, the faculty knew that students struggled with source use in their rhetoric but found it difficult to pinpoint students’ exact source issues. By adapting a rubric theoretically-grounded in the ACRL Framework to deconstruct the concept of source use into four categories, librarians developed a rubric that illuminated source engagement problems on a more granular level than the programmatic assessments conducted without librarian involvement, leading to specific suggestions for addressing issues with student source engagement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number4
Pages (from-to)43-60
Number of pages18
JournalCommunications in Information Literacy
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

literacy
librarian
student
rhetoric
expertise

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education
  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

@article{465cb8adbc01417bb6ff333fdf3941b0,
title = "Through the looking glass: Viewing first-year composition through the lens of information literacy",
abstract = "This paper presents a case study of how librarians can situate themselves as pedagogical partners by bringing their unique information literacy perspective and expertise to the programmatic assessment process. This report resulted from the Thun Library and the Penn State Berks Composition Program's collaboration to assess the institution’s first-year composition (FYC) course. From previous programmatic assessments of their students’ work, the faculty knew that students struggled with source use in their rhetoric but found it difficult to pinpoint students’ exact source issues. By adapting a rubric theoretically-grounded in the ACRL Framework to deconstruct the concept of source use into four categories, librarians developed a rubric that illuminated source engagement problems on a more granular level than the programmatic assessments conducted without librarian involvement, leading to specific suggestions for addressing issues with student source engagement.",
author = "Alexandria Chisholm and Brett Spencer",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.15760/comminfolit.2019.13.1.4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "43--60",
journal = "Communications in Information Literacy",
issn = "1933-5954",
publisher = "Communications in Information Literacy",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Through the looking glass

T2 - Viewing first-year composition through the lens of information literacy

AU - Chisholm, Alexandria

AU - Spencer, Brett

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - This paper presents a case study of how librarians can situate themselves as pedagogical partners by bringing their unique information literacy perspective and expertise to the programmatic assessment process. This report resulted from the Thun Library and the Penn State Berks Composition Program's collaboration to assess the institution’s first-year composition (FYC) course. From previous programmatic assessments of their students’ work, the faculty knew that students struggled with source use in their rhetoric but found it difficult to pinpoint students’ exact source issues. By adapting a rubric theoretically-grounded in the ACRL Framework to deconstruct the concept of source use into four categories, librarians developed a rubric that illuminated source engagement problems on a more granular level than the programmatic assessments conducted without librarian involvement, leading to specific suggestions for addressing issues with student source engagement.

AB - This paper presents a case study of how librarians can situate themselves as pedagogical partners by bringing their unique information literacy perspective and expertise to the programmatic assessment process. This report resulted from the Thun Library and the Penn State Berks Composition Program's collaboration to assess the institution’s first-year composition (FYC) course. From previous programmatic assessments of their students’ work, the faculty knew that students struggled with source use in their rhetoric but found it difficult to pinpoint students’ exact source issues. By adapting a rubric theoretically-grounded in the ACRL Framework to deconstruct the concept of source use into four categories, librarians developed a rubric that illuminated source engagement problems on a more granular level than the programmatic assessments conducted without librarian involvement, leading to specific suggestions for addressing issues with student source engagement.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073424720&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073424720&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.15760/comminfolit.2019.13.1.4

DO - 10.15760/comminfolit.2019.13.1.4

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85073424720

VL - 13

SP - 43

EP - 60

JO - Communications in Information Literacy

JF - Communications in Information Literacy

SN - 1933-5954

IS - 1

M1 - 4

ER -