"Thus, I had to go with what i had"

A multiple methods exploration of novice designers' articulation of prototyping decisions

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Effectively communicating designs to stakeholders or end users is a critical step in the design process yet can be a difficult challenge for engineers. Prototypes are unique tools that can enhance communication between these two groups, as prototypes are physical manifestations of the designer's mental model. Previous work has demonstrated that novice designers often struggle to use prototypes as communication tools. We argue that it is critical that engineering students learn to fully leverage prototypes, and thus the current work sought to understand the relationship between argumentation, prototyping, and design decisions. In order to understand the communication patterns of novice designers during a prototyping task, a controlled study was conducted with a total of 46 undergraduate engineering students. The analysis of quantitative and qualitative data point to the intricate linkages between how students make material decisions and how they justify those decisions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publication30th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology
PublisherAmerican Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
ISBN (Electronic)9780791851845
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018
EventASME 2018 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, IDETC/CIE 2018 - Quebec City, Canada
Duration: Aug 26 2018Aug 29 2018

Publication series

NameProceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference
Volume7

Other

OtherASME 2018 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, IDETC/CIE 2018
CountryCanada
CityQuebec City
Period8/26/188/29/18

Fingerprint

Prototyping
Prototype
Students
Communication
Engineering
Mental Models
Argumentation
Leverage
Linkage
Justify
Design Process
Engineers
Design

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Modeling and Simulation

Cite this

Menold, J., Berdanier, C. G. P., McComb, C., Hocker, E., & Gardner, L. (2018). "Thus, I had to go with what i had": A multiple methods exploration of novice designers' articulation of prototyping decisions. In 30th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology (Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference; Vol. 7). American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2018-85800
Menold, Jessica ; Berdanier, Catherine G P. ; McComb, Christopher ; Hocker, Emma ; Gardner, Lisa. / "Thus, I had to go with what i had" : A multiple methods exploration of novice designers' articulation of prototyping decisions. 30th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), 2018. (Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference).
@inproceedings{6991f0c176bb402498f26d17c9a7647a,
title = "{"}Thus, I had to go with what i had{"}: A multiple methods exploration of novice designers' articulation of prototyping decisions",
abstract = "Effectively communicating designs to stakeholders or end users is a critical step in the design process yet can be a difficult challenge for engineers. Prototypes are unique tools that can enhance communication between these two groups, as prototypes are physical manifestations of the designer's mental model. Previous work has demonstrated that novice designers often struggle to use prototypes as communication tools. We argue that it is critical that engineering students learn to fully leverage prototypes, and thus the current work sought to understand the relationship between argumentation, prototyping, and design decisions. In order to understand the communication patterns of novice designers during a prototyping task, a controlled study was conducted with a total of 46 undergraduate engineering students. The analysis of quantitative and qualitative data point to the intricate linkages between how students make material decisions and how they justify those decisions.",
author = "Jessica Menold and Berdanier, {Catherine G P.} and Christopher McComb and Emma Hocker and Lisa Gardner",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1115/DETC2018-85800",
language = "English (US)",
series = "Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference",
publisher = "American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)",
booktitle = "30th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology",

}

Menold, J, Berdanier, CGP, McComb, C, Hocker, E & Gardner, L 2018, "Thus, I had to go with what i had": A multiple methods exploration of novice designers' articulation of prototyping decisions. in 30th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology. Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, vol. 7, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), ASME 2018 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, IDETC/CIE 2018, Quebec City, Canada, 8/26/18. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2018-85800

"Thus, I had to go with what i had" : A multiple methods exploration of novice designers' articulation of prototyping decisions. / Menold, Jessica; Berdanier, Catherine G P.; McComb, Christopher; Hocker, Emma; Gardner, Lisa.

30th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), 2018. (Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference; Vol. 7).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - "Thus, I had to go with what i had"

T2 - A multiple methods exploration of novice designers' articulation of prototyping decisions

AU - Menold, Jessica

AU - Berdanier, Catherine G P.

AU - McComb, Christopher

AU - Hocker, Emma

AU - Gardner, Lisa

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Effectively communicating designs to stakeholders or end users is a critical step in the design process yet can be a difficult challenge for engineers. Prototypes are unique tools that can enhance communication between these two groups, as prototypes are physical manifestations of the designer's mental model. Previous work has demonstrated that novice designers often struggle to use prototypes as communication tools. We argue that it is critical that engineering students learn to fully leverage prototypes, and thus the current work sought to understand the relationship between argumentation, prototyping, and design decisions. In order to understand the communication patterns of novice designers during a prototyping task, a controlled study was conducted with a total of 46 undergraduate engineering students. The analysis of quantitative and qualitative data point to the intricate linkages between how students make material decisions and how they justify those decisions.

AB - Effectively communicating designs to stakeholders or end users is a critical step in the design process yet can be a difficult challenge for engineers. Prototypes are unique tools that can enhance communication between these two groups, as prototypes are physical manifestations of the designer's mental model. Previous work has demonstrated that novice designers often struggle to use prototypes as communication tools. We argue that it is critical that engineering students learn to fully leverage prototypes, and thus the current work sought to understand the relationship between argumentation, prototyping, and design decisions. In order to understand the communication patterns of novice designers during a prototyping task, a controlled study was conducted with a total of 46 undergraduate engineering students. The analysis of quantitative and qualitative data point to the intricate linkages between how students make material decisions and how they justify those decisions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056831212&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056831212&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1115/DETC2018-85800

DO - 10.1115/DETC2018-85800

M3 - Conference contribution

T3 - Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference

BT - 30th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology

PB - American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)

ER -

Menold J, Berdanier CGP, McComb C, Hocker E, Gardner L. "Thus, I had to go with what i had": A multiple methods exploration of novice designers' articulation of prototyping decisions. In 30th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). 2018. (Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference). https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2018-85800