Tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance is a reliable and accurate indicator of patellofemoral instability

Giampietro L. Vairo, Joaquin Moya-Angeler, Michael A. Siorta, Ashley H. Anderson, Paul S. Sherbondy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BackgroundTibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance is a measurement generally made on CT scans that is commonly used to quantify the risk of patellofemoral instability (PFI); however, its interrater reliability and accuracy as an indicator of PFI in patients is poorly characterized.Questions/purposesThe purposes of our study were (1) to primarily analyze interrater reliability of the TT-TG distance among orthopaedists with varied experience as measured by MRI, (2) to secondarily compare TT-TG distances between PFI and control groups, and (3) to determine an accurate TT-TG distance threshold indicative of PFI.MethodsThe electronic medical records of a senior fellowship-trained orthopaedic sports medicine surgeon were surveyed between 2012 and 2016 for patients who had experienced at least one episode of patellar subluxation or dislocation, who reported no other knee-related history, and who underwent MRI due to persistent PFI signs and symptoms. The records of 48 PFI patients (23 males, 25 females; 19 ± 4 years of age) were compared with 83 controls (60 males, 23 females; 31 ± 8 years of age) having no history of PFI, presenting with an isolated meniscal lesion as determined from MRI and treated by the same orthopaedist during this time. All records meeting study criteria were consecutively included to offset selection bias of the retrospective analysis. Two sports medicine fellows, one who had just completed orthopaedic residency training, and another with a year of experience after residency, and a sports medicine subspecialist with more than 15 years of experience in practice independently recorded TT-TG distance, indicative of tibial tubercle lateralization relative to the femoral trochlea, to the nearest millimeter (mm) in a blinded and randomized fashion. Intraclass correlation coefficient computed interrater reliability accompanied by standard error of measurement (SEM); a one-tailed, two-sample t-test analyzed group differences with accompanying effect size per Cohen's d; receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve determined accuracy and threshold for PFI risk. A p value < 0.05 denoted statistical significance.ResultsInterrater reliability was excellent, at 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84-0.97; SEM = 0.6 mm) for PFI patients and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.91-0.97; SEM = 0.4 mm) for controls. Distance was greater (95% CI, 2-5; p < 0.001) in PFI patients (14 ± 4 mm; range = 7-24 mm) than controls (10 ± 3 mm; range = 3-19 mm) with an effect size of 1 (95% CI, 0.3-2). Area under the ROC curve was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.66-0.83) and threshold was 13 mm (sensitivity = 0.52, 1-specificity = 0.25), suggesting the measure is a fairly accurate indicator of risk and values of 13 mm or greater are better suited to rule in PFI. Respective positive and negative likelihood ratios of 2 and 0.6 at this threshold confirm that this distance yields a small increase in probability for PFI and a minimal decrease in probability for risk; specifically, a 13-mm TT-TG distance is two times more likely to be found in patients with PFI. Furthermore, this threshold is estimated to increase a correct PFI diagnosis by approximately 15%.ConclusionsThe MRI-specific TT-TG distance, based on a single measurement using cartilaginous-tendon landmarks within a standardized trochlear range, is reliable as performed by orthopaedists of varied experience. Patients with PFI display a 4-mm greater distance than controls, which may represent a difference large enough for clinicians to discern in practice using MRI. A 13-mm TT-TG distance is two times more likely seen in patients with PFI. However, this threshold increases a correct PFI diagnosis by only about 15%; therefore, clinical decision-making should not be influenced by this criterion alone and instead used in conjunction with other relevant variables.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1450-1458
Number of pages9
JournalClinical orthopaedics and related research
Volume477
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2019

Fingerprint

Sports Medicine
Confidence Intervals
Internship and Residency
ROC Curve
Orthopedics
Selection Bias
Electronic Health Records
Thigh
Tendons
Signs and Symptoms
Knee
History
Control Groups

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

@article{f8812867be2944768d22711ed2d55c82,
title = "Tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance is a reliable and accurate indicator of patellofemoral instability",
abstract = "BackgroundTibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance is a measurement generally made on CT scans that is commonly used to quantify the risk of patellofemoral instability (PFI); however, its interrater reliability and accuracy as an indicator of PFI in patients is poorly characterized.Questions/purposesThe purposes of our study were (1) to primarily analyze interrater reliability of the TT-TG distance among orthopaedists with varied experience as measured by MRI, (2) to secondarily compare TT-TG distances between PFI and control groups, and (3) to determine an accurate TT-TG distance threshold indicative of PFI.MethodsThe electronic medical records of a senior fellowship-trained orthopaedic sports medicine surgeon were surveyed between 2012 and 2016 for patients who had experienced at least one episode of patellar subluxation or dislocation, who reported no other knee-related history, and who underwent MRI due to persistent PFI signs and symptoms. The records of 48 PFI patients (23 males, 25 females; 19 ± 4 years of age) were compared with 83 controls (60 males, 23 females; 31 ± 8 years of age) having no history of PFI, presenting with an isolated meniscal lesion as determined from MRI and treated by the same orthopaedist during this time. All records meeting study criteria were consecutively included to offset selection bias of the retrospective analysis. Two sports medicine fellows, one who had just completed orthopaedic residency training, and another with a year of experience after residency, and a sports medicine subspecialist with more than 15 years of experience in practice independently recorded TT-TG distance, indicative of tibial tubercle lateralization relative to the femoral trochlea, to the nearest millimeter (mm) in a blinded and randomized fashion. Intraclass correlation coefficient computed interrater reliability accompanied by standard error of measurement (SEM); a one-tailed, two-sample t-test analyzed group differences with accompanying effect size per Cohen's d; receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve determined accuracy and threshold for PFI risk. A p value < 0.05 denoted statistical significance.ResultsInterrater reliability was excellent, at 0.93 (95{\%} confidence interval [CI], 0.84-0.97; SEM = 0.6 mm) for PFI patients and 0.95 (95{\%} CI, 0.91-0.97; SEM = 0.4 mm) for controls. Distance was greater (95{\%} CI, 2-5; p < 0.001) in PFI patients (14 ± 4 mm; range = 7-24 mm) than controls (10 ± 3 mm; range = 3-19 mm) with an effect size of 1 (95{\%} CI, 0.3-2). Area under the ROC curve was 0.75 (95{\%} CI, 0.66-0.83) and threshold was 13 mm (sensitivity = 0.52, 1-specificity = 0.25), suggesting the measure is a fairly accurate indicator of risk and values of 13 mm or greater are better suited to rule in PFI. Respective positive and negative likelihood ratios of 2 and 0.6 at this threshold confirm that this distance yields a small increase in probability for PFI and a minimal decrease in probability for risk; specifically, a 13-mm TT-TG distance is two times more likely to be found in patients with PFI. Furthermore, this threshold is estimated to increase a correct PFI diagnosis by approximately 15{\%}.ConclusionsThe MRI-specific TT-TG distance, based on a single measurement using cartilaginous-tendon landmarks within a standardized trochlear range, is reliable as performed by orthopaedists of varied experience. Patients with PFI display a 4-mm greater distance than controls, which may represent a difference large enough for clinicians to discern in practice using MRI. A 13-mm TT-TG distance is two times more likely seen in patients with PFI. However, this threshold increases a correct PFI diagnosis by only about 15{\%}; therefore, clinical decision-making should not be influenced by this criterion alone and instead used in conjunction with other relevant variables.",
author = "Vairo, {Giampietro L.} and Joaquin Moya-Angeler and Siorta, {Michael A.} and Anderson, {Ashley H.} and Sherbondy, {Paul S.}",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/CORR.0000000000000711",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "477",
pages = "1450--1458",
journal = "Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research",
issn = "0009-921X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "6",

}

Tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance is a reliable and accurate indicator of patellofemoral instability. / Vairo, Giampietro L.; Moya-Angeler, Joaquin; Siorta, Michael A.; Anderson, Ashley H.; Sherbondy, Paul S.

In: Clinical orthopaedics and related research, Vol. 477, No. 6, 01.06.2019, p. 1450-1458.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance is a reliable and accurate indicator of patellofemoral instability

AU - Vairo, Giampietro L.

AU - Moya-Angeler, Joaquin

AU - Siorta, Michael A.

AU - Anderson, Ashley H.

AU - Sherbondy, Paul S.

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - BackgroundTibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance is a measurement generally made on CT scans that is commonly used to quantify the risk of patellofemoral instability (PFI); however, its interrater reliability and accuracy as an indicator of PFI in patients is poorly characterized.Questions/purposesThe purposes of our study were (1) to primarily analyze interrater reliability of the TT-TG distance among orthopaedists with varied experience as measured by MRI, (2) to secondarily compare TT-TG distances between PFI and control groups, and (3) to determine an accurate TT-TG distance threshold indicative of PFI.MethodsThe electronic medical records of a senior fellowship-trained orthopaedic sports medicine surgeon were surveyed between 2012 and 2016 for patients who had experienced at least one episode of patellar subluxation or dislocation, who reported no other knee-related history, and who underwent MRI due to persistent PFI signs and symptoms. The records of 48 PFI patients (23 males, 25 females; 19 ± 4 years of age) were compared with 83 controls (60 males, 23 females; 31 ± 8 years of age) having no history of PFI, presenting with an isolated meniscal lesion as determined from MRI and treated by the same orthopaedist during this time. All records meeting study criteria were consecutively included to offset selection bias of the retrospective analysis. Two sports medicine fellows, one who had just completed orthopaedic residency training, and another with a year of experience after residency, and a sports medicine subspecialist with more than 15 years of experience in practice independently recorded TT-TG distance, indicative of tibial tubercle lateralization relative to the femoral trochlea, to the nearest millimeter (mm) in a blinded and randomized fashion. Intraclass correlation coefficient computed interrater reliability accompanied by standard error of measurement (SEM); a one-tailed, two-sample t-test analyzed group differences with accompanying effect size per Cohen's d; receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve determined accuracy and threshold for PFI risk. A p value < 0.05 denoted statistical significance.ResultsInterrater reliability was excellent, at 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84-0.97; SEM = 0.6 mm) for PFI patients and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.91-0.97; SEM = 0.4 mm) for controls. Distance was greater (95% CI, 2-5; p < 0.001) in PFI patients (14 ± 4 mm; range = 7-24 mm) than controls (10 ± 3 mm; range = 3-19 mm) with an effect size of 1 (95% CI, 0.3-2). Area under the ROC curve was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.66-0.83) and threshold was 13 mm (sensitivity = 0.52, 1-specificity = 0.25), suggesting the measure is a fairly accurate indicator of risk and values of 13 mm or greater are better suited to rule in PFI. Respective positive and negative likelihood ratios of 2 and 0.6 at this threshold confirm that this distance yields a small increase in probability for PFI and a minimal decrease in probability for risk; specifically, a 13-mm TT-TG distance is two times more likely to be found in patients with PFI. Furthermore, this threshold is estimated to increase a correct PFI diagnosis by approximately 15%.ConclusionsThe MRI-specific TT-TG distance, based on a single measurement using cartilaginous-tendon landmarks within a standardized trochlear range, is reliable as performed by orthopaedists of varied experience. Patients with PFI display a 4-mm greater distance than controls, which may represent a difference large enough for clinicians to discern in practice using MRI. A 13-mm TT-TG distance is two times more likely seen in patients with PFI. However, this threshold increases a correct PFI diagnosis by only about 15%; therefore, clinical decision-making should not be influenced by this criterion alone and instead used in conjunction with other relevant variables.

AB - BackgroundTibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance is a measurement generally made on CT scans that is commonly used to quantify the risk of patellofemoral instability (PFI); however, its interrater reliability and accuracy as an indicator of PFI in patients is poorly characterized.Questions/purposesThe purposes of our study were (1) to primarily analyze interrater reliability of the TT-TG distance among orthopaedists with varied experience as measured by MRI, (2) to secondarily compare TT-TG distances between PFI and control groups, and (3) to determine an accurate TT-TG distance threshold indicative of PFI.MethodsThe electronic medical records of a senior fellowship-trained orthopaedic sports medicine surgeon were surveyed between 2012 and 2016 for patients who had experienced at least one episode of patellar subluxation or dislocation, who reported no other knee-related history, and who underwent MRI due to persistent PFI signs and symptoms. The records of 48 PFI patients (23 males, 25 females; 19 ± 4 years of age) were compared with 83 controls (60 males, 23 females; 31 ± 8 years of age) having no history of PFI, presenting with an isolated meniscal lesion as determined from MRI and treated by the same orthopaedist during this time. All records meeting study criteria were consecutively included to offset selection bias of the retrospective analysis. Two sports medicine fellows, one who had just completed orthopaedic residency training, and another with a year of experience after residency, and a sports medicine subspecialist with more than 15 years of experience in practice independently recorded TT-TG distance, indicative of tibial tubercle lateralization relative to the femoral trochlea, to the nearest millimeter (mm) in a blinded and randomized fashion. Intraclass correlation coefficient computed interrater reliability accompanied by standard error of measurement (SEM); a one-tailed, two-sample t-test analyzed group differences with accompanying effect size per Cohen's d; receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve determined accuracy and threshold for PFI risk. A p value < 0.05 denoted statistical significance.ResultsInterrater reliability was excellent, at 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84-0.97; SEM = 0.6 mm) for PFI patients and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.91-0.97; SEM = 0.4 mm) for controls. Distance was greater (95% CI, 2-5; p < 0.001) in PFI patients (14 ± 4 mm; range = 7-24 mm) than controls (10 ± 3 mm; range = 3-19 mm) with an effect size of 1 (95% CI, 0.3-2). Area under the ROC curve was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.66-0.83) and threshold was 13 mm (sensitivity = 0.52, 1-specificity = 0.25), suggesting the measure is a fairly accurate indicator of risk and values of 13 mm or greater are better suited to rule in PFI. Respective positive and negative likelihood ratios of 2 and 0.6 at this threshold confirm that this distance yields a small increase in probability for PFI and a minimal decrease in probability for risk; specifically, a 13-mm TT-TG distance is two times more likely to be found in patients with PFI. Furthermore, this threshold is estimated to increase a correct PFI diagnosis by approximately 15%.ConclusionsThe MRI-specific TT-TG distance, based on a single measurement using cartilaginous-tendon landmarks within a standardized trochlear range, is reliable as performed by orthopaedists of varied experience. Patients with PFI display a 4-mm greater distance than controls, which may represent a difference large enough for clinicians to discern in practice using MRI. A 13-mm TT-TG distance is two times more likely seen in patients with PFI. However, this threshold increases a correct PFI diagnosis by only about 15%; therefore, clinical decision-making should not be influenced by this criterion alone and instead used in conjunction with other relevant variables.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066841941&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066841941&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000711

DO - 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000711

M3 - Article

C2 - 31094842

AN - SCOPUS:85066841941

VL - 477

SP - 1450

EP - 1458

JO - Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

JF - Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

SN - 0009-921X

IS - 6

ER -