Time-of-flight vs. phase contrast techniques for MRI velocimetry

Ella C. Kutter, Kevin W. Moser, John G. Georgiadis, H. Douglas Morris, Richard O. Buckius

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is a non-invasive versatile tool for achieving full-field quantitative visualization. The MRI signal is a result of the interaction between radiofrequency (RF) pulses with nuclear spins exposed to a strong static magnetic field. The two main classes of techniques for MRI velocimetry are: spin-tagging techniques and phase contrast techniques. Spin-tagging techniques involve tagging and tracking a material volume of fluid. This allows a time-of-flight approach to the estimation of local velocity. Phase contrast is based on the difference in accumulated phase (time integral of angular frequency) in the signal arriving in the detector from moving and stationary spins exposed to magnetic field gradients. We compared velocity measurements with spin-tagging and phase contrast by probing the pressure-driven flow of water in a straight tube (Poiseuille flow). Profiles of the axial velocity along various cross sections were acquired for steady laminar flow with Reynolds numbers 170, 670, and 1000. Depending on the imaging sequence and Reynolds number, the velocity errors fell in the 0.5% - 3.2% range.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)49-60
Number of pages12
JournalAmerican Society of Mechanical Engineers, Fluids Engineering Division (Publication) FED
Volume247
StatePublished - Dec 1 1998

Fingerprint

Velocity measurement
Reynolds number
Magnetic fields
Flow of water
Pipe flow
Laminar flow
Visualization
Detectors
Imaging techniques
Fluids
Magnetic Resonance Imaging

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Kutter, Ella C. ; Moser, Kevin W. ; Georgiadis, John G. ; Douglas Morris, H. ; Buckius, Richard O. / Time-of-flight vs. phase contrast techniques for MRI velocimetry. In: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Fluids Engineering Division (Publication) FED. 1998 ; Vol. 247. pp. 49-60.
@article{9038e62233ff4538b3afc16dd49acbb3,
title = "Time-of-flight vs. phase contrast techniques for MRI velocimetry",
abstract = "Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is a non-invasive versatile tool for achieving full-field quantitative visualization. The MRI signal is a result of the interaction between radiofrequency (RF) pulses with nuclear spins exposed to a strong static magnetic field. The two main classes of techniques for MRI velocimetry are: spin-tagging techniques and phase contrast techniques. Spin-tagging techniques involve tagging and tracking a material volume of fluid. This allows a time-of-flight approach to the estimation of local velocity. Phase contrast is based on the difference in accumulated phase (time integral of angular frequency) in the signal arriving in the detector from moving and stationary spins exposed to magnetic field gradients. We compared velocity measurements with spin-tagging and phase contrast by probing the pressure-driven flow of water in a straight tube (Poiseuille flow). Profiles of the axial velocity along various cross sections were acquired for steady laminar flow with Reynolds numbers 170, 670, and 1000. Depending on the imaging sequence and Reynolds number, the velocity errors fell in the 0.5{\%} - 3.2{\%} range.",
author = "Kutter, {Ella C.} and Moser, {Kevin W.} and Georgiadis, {John G.} and {Douglas Morris}, H. and Buckius, {Richard O.}",
year = "1998",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "247",
pages = "49--60",
journal = "American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Fluids Engineering Division (Publication) FED",
issn = "0888-8116",

}

Time-of-flight vs. phase contrast techniques for MRI velocimetry. / Kutter, Ella C.; Moser, Kevin W.; Georgiadis, John G.; Douglas Morris, H.; Buckius, Richard O.

In: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Fluids Engineering Division (Publication) FED, Vol. 247, 01.12.1998, p. 49-60.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Time-of-flight vs. phase contrast techniques for MRI velocimetry

AU - Kutter, Ella C.

AU - Moser, Kevin W.

AU - Georgiadis, John G.

AU - Douglas Morris, H.

AU - Buckius, Richard O.

PY - 1998/12/1

Y1 - 1998/12/1

N2 - Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is a non-invasive versatile tool for achieving full-field quantitative visualization. The MRI signal is a result of the interaction between radiofrequency (RF) pulses with nuclear spins exposed to a strong static magnetic field. The two main classes of techniques for MRI velocimetry are: spin-tagging techniques and phase contrast techniques. Spin-tagging techniques involve tagging and tracking a material volume of fluid. This allows a time-of-flight approach to the estimation of local velocity. Phase contrast is based on the difference in accumulated phase (time integral of angular frequency) in the signal arriving in the detector from moving and stationary spins exposed to magnetic field gradients. We compared velocity measurements with spin-tagging and phase contrast by probing the pressure-driven flow of water in a straight tube (Poiseuille flow). Profiles of the axial velocity along various cross sections were acquired for steady laminar flow with Reynolds numbers 170, 670, and 1000. Depending on the imaging sequence and Reynolds number, the velocity errors fell in the 0.5% - 3.2% range.

AB - Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is a non-invasive versatile tool for achieving full-field quantitative visualization. The MRI signal is a result of the interaction between radiofrequency (RF) pulses with nuclear spins exposed to a strong static magnetic field. The two main classes of techniques for MRI velocimetry are: spin-tagging techniques and phase contrast techniques. Spin-tagging techniques involve tagging and tracking a material volume of fluid. This allows a time-of-flight approach to the estimation of local velocity. Phase contrast is based on the difference in accumulated phase (time integral of angular frequency) in the signal arriving in the detector from moving and stationary spins exposed to magnetic field gradients. We compared velocity measurements with spin-tagging and phase contrast by probing the pressure-driven flow of water in a straight tube (Poiseuille flow). Profiles of the axial velocity along various cross sections were acquired for steady laminar flow with Reynolds numbers 170, 670, and 1000. Depending on the imaging sequence and Reynolds number, the velocity errors fell in the 0.5% - 3.2% range.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032288427&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032288427&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0032288427

VL - 247

SP - 49

EP - 60

JO - American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Fluids Engineering Division (Publication) FED

JF - American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Fluids Engineering Division (Publication) FED

SN - 0888-8116

ER -