To protect and to serve: Alliances and foreign policy portfolios

T. Clifton Morgan, Glenn Hunter Palmer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The consequences of alliance formation for other foreign policies of a state, including defense spending and the initiation of militarized disputes, are examined using a theory of foreign policy that is based on several assumptions. First, states pursue two goods - change (defending those aspects of the status quo that one likes) and maintenance (altering those aspects of the status quo that one dislikes) - through their foreign policies. Second, states select a portfolio of policies designed to produce the most preferred mix of the two goods. Third, all foreign policy behavior, including alliance involvement, requires resources. Fourth, states are rational in their allocation of resources. Together, these imply that an observed alliance must have been the most efficient mechanism available for acquiring the most desired and achievable foreign policy portfolio and have implications for the observation of foreign policy substitutability. The empirical implications of this implication are tested, and results support the model: states are more active in their foreign policies after adding to their alliance portfolios - they increase their rate of conflict initiation, the capital intensiveness of their military establishments, and their defense spending.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)180-203
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of Conflict Resolution
Volume47
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2003

Fingerprint

alliance policy
foreign policy
Foreign policy
Alliances
resources
Military

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

@article{237b64f08b824ac590407c05244055f9,
title = "To protect and to serve: Alliances and foreign policy portfolios",
abstract = "The consequences of alliance formation for other foreign policies of a state, including defense spending and the initiation of militarized disputes, are examined using a theory of foreign policy that is based on several assumptions. First, states pursue two goods - change (defending those aspects of the status quo that one likes) and maintenance (altering those aspects of the status quo that one dislikes) - through their foreign policies. Second, states select a portfolio of policies designed to produce the most preferred mix of the two goods. Third, all foreign policy behavior, including alliance involvement, requires resources. Fourth, states are rational in their allocation of resources. Together, these imply that an observed alliance must have been the most efficient mechanism available for acquiring the most desired and achievable foreign policy portfolio and have implications for the observation of foreign policy substitutability. The empirical implications of this implication are tested, and results support the model: states are more active in their foreign policies after adding to their alliance portfolios - they increase their rate of conflict initiation, the capital intensiveness of their military establishments, and their defense spending.",
author = "Morgan, {T. Clifton} and Palmer, {Glenn Hunter}",
year = "2003",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0022002702251028",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
pages = "180--203",
journal = "Journal of Conflict Resolution",
issn = "0022-0027",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

To protect and to serve : Alliances and foreign policy portfolios. / Morgan, T. Clifton; Palmer, Glenn Hunter.

In: Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 47, No. 2, 01.04.2003, p. 180-203.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - To protect and to serve

T2 - Alliances and foreign policy portfolios

AU - Morgan, T. Clifton

AU - Palmer, Glenn Hunter

PY - 2003/4/1

Y1 - 2003/4/1

N2 - The consequences of alliance formation for other foreign policies of a state, including defense spending and the initiation of militarized disputes, are examined using a theory of foreign policy that is based on several assumptions. First, states pursue two goods - change (defending those aspects of the status quo that one likes) and maintenance (altering those aspects of the status quo that one dislikes) - through their foreign policies. Second, states select a portfolio of policies designed to produce the most preferred mix of the two goods. Third, all foreign policy behavior, including alliance involvement, requires resources. Fourth, states are rational in their allocation of resources. Together, these imply that an observed alliance must have been the most efficient mechanism available for acquiring the most desired and achievable foreign policy portfolio and have implications for the observation of foreign policy substitutability. The empirical implications of this implication are tested, and results support the model: states are more active in their foreign policies after adding to their alliance portfolios - they increase their rate of conflict initiation, the capital intensiveness of their military establishments, and their defense spending.

AB - The consequences of alliance formation for other foreign policies of a state, including defense spending and the initiation of militarized disputes, are examined using a theory of foreign policy that is based on several assumptions. First, states pursue two goods - change (defending those aspects of the status quo that one likes) and maintenance (altering those aspects of the status quo that one dislikes) - through their foreign policies. Second, states select a portfolio of policies designed to produce the most preferred mix of the two goods. Third, all foreign policy behavior, including alliance involvement, requires resources. Fourth, states are rational in their allocation of resources. Together, these imply that an observed alliance must have been the most efficient mechanism available for acquiring the most desired and achievable foreign policy portfolio and have implications for the observation of foreign policy substitutability. The empirical implications of this implication are tested, and results support the model: states are more active in their foreign policies after adding to their alliance portfolios - they increase their rate of conflict initiation, the capital intensiveness of their military establishments, and their defense spending.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037278828&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037278828&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0022002702251028

DO - 10.1177/0022002702251028

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0037278828

VL - 47

SP - 180

EP - 203

JO - Journal of Conflict Resolution

JF - Journal of Conflict Resolution

SN - 0022-0027

IS - 2

ER -