Totalitarian visual "monologue": Reading soviet posters with Bakhtin

Ekaterina V. Haskins, James P. Zappen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Contemporary scholarship has noted Mikhail M. Bakhtin's apparent animosity toward rhetoric. Bakhtin's distinction between monologue and dialogue helps to explain his view of rhetoric, which is both hostile and receptive-hostile to monologic rhetoric but receptive to a dialogic rhetoric that is responsive to others. This article reads Bakhtin's account of monologue and dialogue as a reaction to the pervasive totalitarian visual rhetoric of the Soviet state. Drawing on Bakhtin's descriptions of authoritative and internally persuasive discourses and various kinds of double-voiced discourse-parody, satire, and polemic-the article analyzes the workings of Soviet visual rhetoric as both monologic and potentially dialogic and recovers the various forms of otherness displaced by this rhetoric.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)326-359
Number of pages34
JournalRhetoric Society Quarterly
Volume40
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2010

Fingerprint

poster
rhetoric
satire
dialogue
discourse
foreignness

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Communication
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

@article{d5e523e08794411fbe48fa5c15249d57,
title = "Totalitarian visual {"}monologue{"}: Reading soviet posters with Bakhtin",
abstract = "Contemporary scholarship has noted Mikhail M. Bakhtin's apparent animosity toward rhetoric. Bakhtin's distinction between monologue and dialogue helps to explain his view of rhetoric, which is both hostile and receptive-hostile to monologic rhetoric but receptive to a dialogic rhetoric that is responsive to others. This article reads Bakhtin's account of monologue and dialogue as a reaction to the pervasive totalitarian visual rhetoric of the Soviet state. Drawing on Bakhtin's descriptions of authoritative and internally persuasive discourses and various kinds of double-voiced discourse-parody, satire, and polemic-the article analyzes the workings of Soviet visual rhetoric as both monologic and potentially dialogic and recovers the various forms of otherness displaced by this rhetoric.",
author = "Haskins, {Ekaterina V.} and Zappen, {James P.}",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/02773945.2010.499860",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "326--359",
journal = "RSQ-Rhetoric Society Quarterly",
issn = "0277-3945",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

Totalitarian visual "monologue" : Reading soviet posters with Bakhtin. / Haskins, Ekaterina V.; Zappen, James P.

In: Rhetoric Society Quarterly, Vol. 40, No. 4, 01.12.2010, p. 326-359.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Totalitarian visual "monologue"

T2 - Reading soviet posters with Bakhtin

AU - Haskins, Ekaterina V.

AU - Zappen, James P.

PY - 2010/12/1

Y1 - 2010/12/1

N2 - Contemporary scholarship has noted Mikhail M. Bakhtin's apparent animosity toward rhetoric. Bakhtin's distinction between monologue and dialogue helps to explain his view of rhetoric, which is both hostile and receptive-hostile to monologic rhetoric but receptive to a dialogic rhetoric that is responsive to others. This article reads Bakhtin's account of monologue and dialogue as a reaction to the pervasive totalitarian visual rhetoric of the Soviet state. Drawing on Bakhtin's descriptions of authoritative and internally persuasive discourses and various kinds of double-voiced discourse-parody, satire, and polemic-the article analyzes the workings of Soviet visual rhetoric as both monologic and potentially dialogic and recovers the various forms of otherness displaced by this rhetoric.

AB - Contemporary scholarship has noted Mikhail M. Bakhtin's apparent animosity toward rhetoric. Bakhtin's distinction between monologue and dialogue helps to explain his view of rhetoric, which is both hostile and receptive-hostile to monologic rhetoric but receptive to a dialogic rhetoric that is responsive to others. This article reads Bakhtin's account of monologue and dialogue as a reaction to the pervasive totalitarian visual rhetoric of the Soviet state. Drawing on Bakhtin's descriptions of authoritative and internally persuasive discourses and various kinds of double-voiced discourse-parody, satire, and polemic-the article analyzes the workings of Soviet visual rhetoric as both monologic and potentially dialogic and recovers the various forms of otherness displaced by this rhetoric.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952866910&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952866910&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02773945.2010.499860

DO - 10.1080/02773945.2010.499860

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79952866910

VL - 40

SP - 326

EP - 359

JO - RSQ-Rhetoric Society Quarterly

JF - RSQ-Rhetoric Society Quarterly

SN - 0277-3945

IS - 4

ER -