Totalitarismus a nekonecny piodnosti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

It is clear that Levinas's critique of the dominance within Western philosophy of the concept of totality in Totality and Infinity was intended as a response to totalitarianism, but the extent to which this determines the organization of the book and the way in which this takes place has been largely misconceived. This is because of the failure to take seriously the opening question of whether or not we are duped by morality. "The ethical resistance of the face of the Other does not adequately address that question until morality is secured against the challenge issued by a philosophy that equates being with war and that takes place only through the account of the infinite time of fecundity. Fecundity concretized in the family is the site of resistance to the totalitarian tendencies of any state that seeks for the sake of its preservation to legislate procreation. Hence fecundity and Eros are "beyond the face." This reading draws on the important role given to fecundity in Time and the Other as well as the texts newly available in the first three volumes of Levinas's Oeuvres.

Original languageCzech
Pages (from-to)11-19
Number of pages9
JournalFilosoficky Casopis
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Religious studies

Cite this

@article{58c813a985ed427dab7f91db516a449a,
title = "Totalitarismus a nekonecny piodnosti",
abstract = "It is clear that Levinas's critique of the dominance within Western philosophy of the concept of totality in Totality and Infinity was intended as a response to totalitarianism, but the extent to which this determines the organization of the book and the way in which this takes place has been largely misconceived. This is because of the failure to take seriously the opening question of whether or not we are duped by morality. {"}The ethical resistance of the face of the Other does not adequately address that question until morality is secured against the challenge issued by a philosophy that equates being with war and that takes place only through the account of the infinite time of fecundity. Fecundity concretized in the family is the site of resistance to the totalitarian tendencies of any state that seeks for the sake of its preservation to legislate procreation. Hence fecundity and Eros are {"}beyond the face.{"} This reading draws on the important role given to fecundity in Time and the Other as well as the texts newly available in the first three volumes of Levinas's Oeuvres.",
author = "Bernasconi, {Robert Lambert}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "Czech",
pages = "11--19",
journal = "Filosoficky Casopis",
issn = "0015-1831",
publisher = "Czech Academy of Sciences",

}

Totalitarismus a nekonecny piodnosti. / Bernasconi, Robert Lambert.

In: Filosoficky Casopis, 01.01.2014, p. 11-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Totalitarismus a nekonecny piodnosti

AU - Bernasconi, Robert Lambert

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - It is clear that Levinas's critique of the dominance within Western philosophy of the concept of totality in Totality and Infinity was intended as a response to totalitarianism, but the extent to which this determines the organization of the book and the way in which this takes place has been largely misconceived. This is because of the failure to take seriously the opening question of whether or not we are duped by morality. "The ethical resistance of the face of the Other does not adequately address that question until morality is secured against the challenge issued by a philosophy that equates being with war and that takes place only through the account of the infinite time of fecundity. Fecundity concretized in the family is the site of resistance to the totalitarian tendencies of any state that seeks for the sake of its preservation to legislate procreation. Hence fecundity and Eros are "beyond the face." This reading draws on the important role given to fecundity in Time and the Other as well as the texts newly available in the first three volumes of Levinas's Oeuvres.

AB - It is clear that Levinas's critique of the dominance within Western philosophy of the concept of totality in Totality and Infinity was intended as a response to totalitarianism, but the extent to which this determines the organization of the book and the way in which this takes place has been largely misconceived. This is because of the failure to take seriously the opening question of whether or not we are duped by morality. "The ethical resistance of the face of the Other does not adequately address that question until morality is secured against the challenge issued by a philosophy that equates being with war and that takes place only through the account of the infinite time of fecundity. Fecundity concretized in the family is the site of resistance to the totalitarian tendencies of any state that seeks for the sake of its preservation to legislate procreation. Hence fecundity and Eros are "beyond the face." This reading draws on the important role given to fecundity in Time and the Other as well as the texts newly available in the first three volumes of Levinas's Oeuvres.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924576125&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84924576125&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

SP - 11

EP - 19

JO - Filosoficky Casopis

JF - Filosoficky Casopis

SN - 0015-1831

ER -