Toward a Robust Theory of the Chinese Constitutional State: Between Formalism and Legitimacy in Jiang Shigong's Constitutionalism

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The state of constitutional theory is in flux. What was once the preserve of those who organized the state became the expression of mass democracy and the popular will, one that has been increasingly constrained by international consensus on the limits of political will within national borders. The stakes are high-constitutional legitimacy is fundamental to internal political stability and to international acceptance. Among the most contested forms of modern constitutional states are party-state systems grounded in Marxist-Leninist theory. This article considers Jiang Shigong's development of a coherent and legitimating constitutionalist theory of China's party-state system. It considers Jiang's argument that constitutionalism must start with values and structure and then considers the mechanics through which it is institutionalized-either in writing or through structuralist approaches. It also examines Jiang's construction of a formal-functional theory of Chinese constitutionalism that acknowledges the democratic basis and the representative character of the Chinese Communist Party within the party-state system. Jiang's theoretical developments point to the deepening of an understanding of the legitimacy of Chinese constitutionalism. Jiang Shigong is part of a small group of Chinese academics who are working along distinct paths to move beyond the "legitimacy" issue of Chinese constitutionalism and tackle the much harder but more important question of the continued development of Chinese constitutionalism along the lines of its own logic. Critical to that project are notions of civic education and the consequences of the separation of powers at the heart of Chinese constitutionalism-one that distinguishes between the administrative power of the government, including the administration and rule of law, and the political power of the Chinese Communist Party, including the nation's constitutional norms.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)168-195
Number of pages28
JournalModern China
Volume40
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2014

Fingerprint

constitutionalism
constitutional state
legitimacy
party state
political power
communist party
democracy
mechanics
education
separation of powers
national border
political stability
Legitimacy
Constitutionalism
Formalism
Marxism
mechanic
small group
acceptance
China

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • History
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{19dfbc0293e948beaa0027bb6db269a0,
title = "Toward a Robust Theory of the Chinese Constitutional State: Between Formalism and Legitimacy in Jiang Shigong's Constitutionalism",
abstract = "The state of constitutional theory is in flux. What was once the preserve of those who organized the state became the expression of mass democracy and the popular will, one that has been increasingly constrained by international consensus on the limits of political will within national borders. The stakes are high-constitutional legitimacy is fundamental to internal political stability and to international acceptance. Among the most contested forms of modern constitutional states are party-state systems grounded in Marxist-Leninist theory. This article considers Jiang Shigong's development of a coherent and legitimating constitutionalist theory of China's party-state system. It considers Jiang's argument that constitutionalism must start with values and structure and then considers the mechanics through which it is institutionalized-either in writing or through structuralist approaches. It also examines Jiang's construction of a formal-functional theory of Chinese constitutionalism that acknowledges the democratic basis and the representative character of the Chinese Communist Party within the party-state system. Jiang's theoretical developments point to the deepening of an understanding of the legitimacy of Chinese constitutionalism. Jiang Shigong is part of a small group of Chinese academics who are working along distinct paths to move beyond the {"}legitimacy{"} issue of Chinese constitutionalism and tackle the much harder but more important question of the continued development of Chinese constitutionalism along the lines of its own logic. Critical to that project are notions of civic education and the consequences of the separation of powers at the heart of Chinese constitutionalism-one that distinguishes between the administrative power of the government, including the administration and rule of law, and the political power of the Chinese Communist Party, including the nation's constitutional norms.",
author = "Backer, {Larry Cata}",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0097700413511315",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "168--195",
journal = "Modern China",
issn = "0097-7004",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Toward a Robust Theory of the Chinese Constitutional State

T2 - Between Formalism and Legitimacy in Jiang Shigong's Constitutionalism

AU - Backer, Larry Cata

PY - 2014/3/1

Y1 - 2014/3/1

N2 - The state of constitutional theory is in flux. What was once the preserve of those who organized the state became the expression of mass democracy and the popular will, one that has been increasingly constrained by international consensus on the limits of political will within national borders. The stakes are high-constitutional legitimacy is fundamental to internal political stability and to international acceptance. Among the most contested forms of modern constitutional states are party-state systems grounded in Marxist-Leninist theory. This article considers Jiang Shigong's development of a coherent and legitimating constitutionalist theory of China's party-state system. It considers Jiang's argument that constitutionalism must start with values and structure and then considers the mechanics through which it is institutionalized-either in writing or through structuralist approaches. It also examines Jiang's construction of a formal-functional theory of Chinese constitutionalism that acknowledges the democratic basis and the representative character of the Chinese Communist Party within the party-state system. Jiang's theoretical developments point to the deepening of an understanding of the legitimacy of Chinese constitutionalism. Jiang Shigong is part of a small group of Chinese academics who are working along distinct paths to move beyond the "legitimacy" issue of Chinese constitutionalism and tackle the much harder but more important question of the continued development of Chinese constitutionalism along the lines of its own logic. Critical to that project are notions of civic education and the consequences of the separation of powers at the heart of Chinese constitutionalism-one that distinguishes between the administrative power of the government, including the administration and rule of law, and the political power of the Chinese Communist Party, including the nation's constitutional norms.

AB - The state of constitutional theory is in flux. What was once the preserve of those who organized the state became the expression of mass democracy and the popular will, one that has been increasingly constrained by international consensus on the limits of political will within national borders. The stakes are high-constitutional legitimacy is fundamental to internal political stability and to international acceptance. Among the most contested forms of modern constitutional states are party-state systems grounded in Marxist-Leninist theory. This article considers Jiang Shigong's development of a coherent and legitimating constitutionalist theory of China's party-state system. It considers Jiang's argument that constitutionalism must start with values and structure and then considers the mechanics through which it is institutionalized-either in writing or through structuralist approaches. It also examines Jiang's construction of a formal-functional theory of Chinese constitutionalism that acknowledges the democratic basis and the representative character of the Chinese Communist Party within the party-state system. Jiang's theoretical developments point to the deepening of an understanding of the legitimacy of Chinese constitutionalism. Jiang Shigong is part of a small group of Chinese academics who are working along distinct paths to move beyond the "legitimacy" issue of Chinese constitutionalism and tackle the much harder but more important question of the continued development of Chinese constitutionalism along the lines of its own logic. Critical to that project are notions of civic education and the consequences of the separation of powers at the heart of Chinese constitutionalism-one that distinguishes between the administrative power of the government, including the administration and rule of law, and the political power of the Chinese Communist Party, including the nation's constitutional norms.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893665039&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893665039&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0097700413511315

DO - 10.1177/0097700413511315

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84893665039

VL - 40

SP - 168

EP - 195

JO - Modern China

JF - Modern China

SN - 0097-7004

IS - 2

ER -