TY - GEN
T1 - Toward affordable low-carbon power
T2 - Geothermal Resources Council Annual Meeting 2012 - Geothermal: Reliable, Renewable, Global, GRC 2012
AU - Turaga, Uday
AU - Shembekar, Vishakha
AU - Viswanathan, Subbaraman
AU - Mohan, Arun Ram
AU - Pisupati, Sarma V.
AU - Elsworth, Derek
PY - 2012/12/1
Y1 - 2012/12/1
N2 - We are currently studying the economics of Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) and various factors that can reduce its Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE). As part of this effort, we are exploring the potential of reducing the collective system's LCOE by integrating EGS with Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle with Carbon Capture and Sequestration (IGCC-CCS). CO 2-EGS offers a number of potential benefits. For example, heat transfer and fluid dynamics simulations suggest that CO2 could be a better heat mining agent than water in EGS. Additionally lower viscosity and larger expansivity of CO2 in comparison to those of water are expected to reduce parasitic losses by increasing buoyancy forces. CO 2 sequestration would be an ancillary benefit. Similarly, IGCC has a number of benefits. The chemical conversion of coal to synthetic gas is a cleaner process than coal combustion. IGCC plants operate at higher efficiencies and produce a pure stream of CO2 which can be directly used in EGS as a heat extraction fluid. Given these benefits and complementarity, we are studying the economics, environmental footprint, and operational envelope of an integrated CO2-EGS-IGCC system. This paper describes our preliminary results including estimates of LCOE, environmental footprint, and issues associated with the operating envelope.
AB - We are currently studying the economics of Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) and various factors that can reduce its Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE). As part of this effort, we are exploring the potential of reducing the collective system's LCOE by integrating EGS with Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle with Carbon Capture and Sequestration (IGCC-CCS). CO 2-EGS offers a number of potential benefits. For example, heat transfer and fluid dynamics simulations suggest that CO2 could be a better heat mining agent than water in EGS. Additionally lower viscosity and larger expansivity of CO2 in comparison to those of water are expected to reduce parasitic losses by increasing buoyancy forces. CO 2 sequestration would be an ancillary benefit. Similarly, IGCC has a number of benefits. The chemical conversion of coal to synthetic gas is a cleaner process than coal combustion. IGCC plants operate at higher efficiencies and produce a pure stream of CO2 which can be directly used in EGS as a heat extraction fluid. Given these benefits and complementarity, we are studying the economics, environmental footprint, and operational envelope of an integrated CO2-EGS-IGCC system. This paper describes our preliminary results including estimates of LCOE, environmental footprint, and issues associated with the operating envelope.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876228106&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876228106&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84876228106
SN - 9781622764341
T3 - Transactions - Geothermal Resources Council
SP - 569
EP - 573
BT - Geothermal Resources Council Annual Meeting 2012, GRC 2012 - Geothermal
Y2 - 30 September 2012 through 3 October 2012
ER -