| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 244-247 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Psychological Inquiry |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jul 2012 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Psychology(all)
Access to Document
Other files and links
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver
}
Toward Open Behavioral Science. / Adolph, Karen E.; Gilmore, Rick O.; Freeman, Clinton; Sanderson, Penelope; Millman, David.
In: Psychological Inquiry, Vol. 23, No. 3, 07.2012, p. 244-247.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - Toward Open Behavioral Science
AU - Adolph, Karen E.
AU - Gilmore, Rick O.
AU - Freeman, Clinton
AU - Sanderson, Penelope
AU - Millman, David
N1 - Funding Information: This work was supported by National Institute of Health and Human Development Grant R37-HD33486 to Karen E. Adolph and National Science Foundation award 1147440 to Rick O. Gilmore. Funding Information: Why share? One good reason to share data is that everyone—researchers, funders, the public—gets a bigger bang for their buck. Data sharing accelerates discovery. Much more rapid progress would be made if researchers could build on earlier efforts by analyzing videos in ways unimagined by the original researcher; if researchers could browse for examples to stimulate new work or to train and educate students; and if researchers could gather preliminary data, expand samples, run replications, examine cohort effects, and assess effects of geographic location or population using data in a shared archive. Researchers could use tools contributed to a shared repository to enhance understanding of their own data and use shared data to test their analytic tools. They could collaborate with like-minded researchers in subareas of interest to create corpora with shared coding schemes and analysis tools (e.g., TalkBank). A history of data sharing and a plan to commit data to an open repository would enhance the likelihood of Federal funding. Researchers’ work would receive more attention and citations by users, and their data would survive in useable form beyond their lifetimes. These are not our claims, although we endorse them. They come from the NIH Data Sharing Workbook (National Institutes of Health, 2004) and the NSF 2011 National Science Board report on data sharing (National Science Foundation, 2011).
PY - 2012/7
Y1 - 2012/7
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865732395&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865732395&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/1047840X.2012.705133
DO - 10.1080/1047840X.2012.705133
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84865732395
VL - 23
SP - 244
EP - 247
JO - Psychological Inquiry
JF - Psychological Inquiry
SN - 1047-840X
IS - 3
ER -