Toward rational design of electrical stimulation strategies for epilepsy control

Sridhar Sunderam, Bruce Gluckman, Davide Reato, Marom Bikson

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

64 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Electrical stimulation is emerging as a viable alternative for patients with epilepsy whose seizures are not alleviated by drugs or surgery. Its attractions are temporal and spatial specificity of action, flexibility of waveform parameters and timing, and the perception that its effects are reversible unlike resective surgery. However, despite significant advances in our understanding of mechanisms of neural electrical stimulation, clinical electrotherapy for seizures relies heavily on empirical tuning of parameters and protocols. We highlight concurrent treatment goals with potentially conflicting design constraints that must be resolved when formulating rational strategies for epilepsy electrotherapy, namely, seizure reduction versus cognitive impairment, stimulation efficacy versus tissue safety, and mechanistic insight versus clinical pragmatism. First, treatment markers, objectives, and metrics relevant to electrical stimulation for epilepsy are discussed from a clinical perspective. Then the experimental perspective is presented, with the biophysical mechanisms and modalities of open-loop electrical stimulation, and the potential benefits of closed-loop control for epilepsy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)6-22
Number of pages17
JournalEpilepsy and Behavior
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2010

Fingerprint

Electric Stimulation
Epilepsy
Electric Stimulation Therapy
Seizures
Safety
Therapeutics
Pharmaceutical Preparations

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Sunderam, Sridhar ; Gluckman, Bruce ; Reato, Davide ; Bikson, Marom. / Toward rational design of electrical stimulation strategies for epilepsy control. In: Epilepsy and Behavior. 2010 ; Vol. 17, No. 1. pp. 6-22.
@article{b10533bdfdb94748a80b52c76819cc7e,
title = "Toward rational design of electrical stimulation strategies for epilepsy control",
abstract = "Electrical stimulation is emerging as a viable alternative for patients with epilepsy whose seizures are not alleviated by drugs or surgery. Its attractions are temporal and spatial specificity of action, flexibility of waveform parameters and timing, and the perception that its effects are reversible unlike resective surgery. However, despite significant advances in our understanding of mechanisms of neural electrical stimulation, clinical electrotherapy for seizures relies heavily on empirical tuning of parameters and protocols. We highlight concurrent treatment goals with potentially conflicting design constraints that must be resolved when formulating rational strategies for epilepsy electrotherapy, namely, seizure reduction versus cognitive impairment, stimulation efficacy versus tissue safety, and mechanistic insight versus clinical pragmatism. First, treatment markers, objectives, and metrics relevant to electrical stimulation for epilepsy are discussed from a clinical perspective. Then the experimental perspective is presented, with the biophysical mechanisms and modalities of open-loop electrical stimulation, and the potential benefits of closed-loop control for epilepsy.",
author = "Sridhar Sunderam and Bruce Gluckman and Davide Reato and Marom Bikson",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.yebeh.2009.10.017",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "6--22",
journal = "Epilepsy and Behavior",
issn = "1525-5050",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Toward rational design of electrical stimulation strategies for epilepsy control. / Sunderam, Sridhar; Gluckman, Bruce; Reato, Davide; Bikson, Marom.

In: Epilepsy and Behavior, Vol. 17, No. 1, 01.01.2010, p. 6-22.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Toward rational design of electrical stimulation strategies for epilepsy control

AU - Sunderam, Sridhar

AU - Gluckman, Bruce

AU - Reato, Davide

AU - Bikson, Marom

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - Electrical stimulation is emerging as a viable alternative for patients with epilepsy whose seizures are not alleviated by drugs or surgery. Its attractions are temporal and spatial specificity of action, flexibility of waveform parameters and timing, and the perception that its effects are reversible unlike resective surgery. However, despite significant advances in our understanding of mechanisms of neural electrical stimulation, clinical electrotherapy for seizures relies heavily on empirical tuning of parameters and protocols. We highlight concurrent treatment goals with potentially conflicting design constraints that must be resolved when formulating rational strategies for epilepsy electrotherapy, namely, seizure reduction versus cognitive impairment, stimulation efficacy versus tissue safety, and mechanistic insight versus clinical pragmatism. First, treatment markers, objectives, and metrics relevant to electrical stimulation for epilepsy are discussed from a clinical perspective. Then the experimental perspective is presented, with the biophysical mechanisms and modalities of open-loop electrical stimulation, and the potential benefits of closed-loop control for epilepsy.

AB - Electrical stimulation is emerging as a viable alternative for patients with epilepsy whose seizures are not alleviated by drugs or surgery. Its attractions are temporal and spatial specificity of action, flexibility of waveform parameters and timing, and the perception that its effects are reversible unlike resective surgery. However, despite significant advances in our understanding of mechanisms of neural electrical stimulation, clinical electrotherapy for seizures relies heavily on empirical tuning of parameters and protocols. We highlight concurrent treatment goals with potentially conflicting design constraints that must be resolved when formulating rational strategies for epilepsy electrotherapy, namely, seizure reduction versus cognitive impairment, stimulation efficacy versus tissue safety, and mechanistic insight versus clinical pragmatism. First, treatment markers, objectives, and metrics relevant to electrical stimulation for epilepsy are discussed from a clinical perspective. Then the experimental perspective is presented, with the biophysical mechanisms and modalities of open-loop electrical stimulation, and the potential benefits of closed-loop control for epilepsy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=72949084170&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=72949084170&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.yebeh.2009.10.017

DO - 10.1016/j.yebeh.2009.10.017

M3 - Review article

C2 - 19926525

AN - SCOPUS:72949084170

VL - 17

SP - 6

EP - 22

JO - Epilepsy and Behavior

JF - Epilepsy and Behavior

SN - 1525-5050

IS - 1

ER -