Towards a sociology of disease

Stefan Timmermans, Steven Haas

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

76 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We argue for a sociology of health, illness, and disease. Under the influence of Talcott Parsons, the social study of health began as medical sociology and then morphed into sociology of health and illness, focusing largely on the social aspects of health-related topics. Social scientists have been reluctant to tackle disease in its physiological and biological manifestations. The result is an impoverishment of sociological analysis on at least three levels: social scientists have rarely made diseases central to their inquiries; they have been reluctant to include clinical endpoints in their analysis; and they have largely bracketed the normative purpose of health interventions. Consequently, social scientists tend to ignore what often matters most to patients and health care providers, and the social processes social scientists describe remain clinically unanchored. A sociology of disease explores the dialectic between social life and disease; aiming to examine whether and how social life matters for morbidity and mortality and vice versa. Drawing from specific advances in science and technology studies and social epidemiology, we point to ways that sociologists can participate as health researchers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)659-676
Number of pages18
JournalSociology of Health and Illness
Volume30
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2008

Fingerprint

Sociology
sociology
Disease
social scientist
Health
health
illness
Medical Sociology
medical sociology
technology studies
science studies
social studies
epidemiology
dialectics
social process
patient care
sociologist
Health Personnel
morbidity
Patient Care

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health(social science)
  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Timmermans, Stefan ; Haas, Steven. / Towards a sociology of disease. In: Sociology of Health and Illness. 2008 ; Vol. 30, No. 5. pp. 659-676.
@article{54c75b56630d4f7c9dc066ac6208d5ed,
title = "Towards a sociology of disease",
abstract = "We argue for a sociology of health, illness, and disease. Under the influence of Talcott Parsons, the social study of health began as medical sociology and then morphed into sociology of health and illness, focusing largely on the social aspects of health-related topics. Social scientists have been reluctant to tackle disease in its physiological and biological manifestations. The result is an impoverishment of sociological analysis on at least three levels: social scientists have rarely made diseases central to their inquiries; they have been reluctant to include clinical endpoints in their analysis; and they have largely bracketed the normative purpose of health interventions. Consequently, social scientists tend to ignore what often matters most to patients and health care providers, and the social processes social scientists describe remain clinically unanchored. A sociology of disease explores the dialectic between social life and disease; aiming to examine whether and how social life matters for morbidity and mortality and vice versa. Drawing from specific advances in science and technology studies and social epidemiology, we point to ways that sociologists can participate as health researchers.",
author = "Stefan Timmermans and Steven Haas",
year = "2008",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9566.2008.01097.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "659--676",
journal = "Sociology of Health and Illness",
issn = "0141-9889",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

Towards a sociology of disease. / Timmermans, Stefan; Haas, Steven.

In: Sociology of Health and Illness, Vol. 30, No. 5, 01.07.2008, p. 659-676.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Towards a sociology of disease

AU - Timmermans, Stefan

AU - Haas, Steven

PY - 2008/7/1

Y1 - 2008/7/1

N2 - We argue for a sociology of health, illness, and disease. Under the influence of Talcott Parsons, the social study of health began as medical sociology and then morphed into sociology of health and illness, focusing largely on the social aspects of health-related topics. Social scientists have been reluctant to tackle disease in its physiological and biological manifestations. The result is an impoverishment of sociological analysis on at least three levels: social scientists have rarely made diseases central to their inquiries; they have been reluctant to include clinical endpoints in their analysis; and they have largely bracketed the normative purpose of health interventions. Consequently, social scientists tend to ignore what often matters most to patients and health care providers, and the social processes social scientists describe remain clinically unanchored. A sociology of disease explores the dialectic between social life and disease; aiming to examine whether and how social life matters for morbidity and mortality and vice versa. Drawing from specific advances in science and technology studies and social epidemiology, we point to ways that sociologists can participate as health researchers.

AB - We argue for a sociology of health, illness, and disease. Under the influence of Talcott Parsons, the social study of health began as medical sociology and then morphed into sociology of health and illness, focusing largely on the social aspects of health-related topics. Social scientists have been reluctant to tackle disease in its physiological and biological manifestations. The result is an impoverishment of sociological analysis on at least three levels: social scientists have rarely made diseases central to their inquiries; they have been reluctant to include clinical endpoints in their analysis; and they have largely bracketed the normative purpose of health interventions. Consequently, social scientists tend to ignore what often matters most to patients and health care providers, and the social processes social scientists describe remain clinically unanchored. A sociology of disease explores the dialectic between social life and disease; aiming to examine whether and how social life matters for morbidity and mortality and vice versa. Drawing from specific advances in science and technology studies and social epidemiology, we point to ways that sociologists can participate as health researchers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=47349119330&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=47349119330&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2008.01097.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2008.01097.x

M3 - Review article

C2 - 18564975

AN - SCOPUS:47349119330

VL - 30

SP - 659

EP - 676

JO - Sociology of Health and Illness

JF - Sociology of Health and Illness

SN - 0141-9889

IS - 5

ER -