Towards Integrated Ethical and Scientific Analysis of Geoengineering: A Research Agenda

Nancy A. Tuana, Ryan L. Sriver, Toby Svoboda, Roman Olson, Peter J. Irvine, Jacob Haqq-Misra, Klaus Keller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Concerns about the risks of unmitigated greenhouse gas emissions are growing. At the same time, confidence that international policy agreements will succeed in considerably lowering anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions is declining. Perhaps as a result, various geoengineering solutions are gaining attention and credibility as a way to manage climate change. Serious consideration is currently being given to proposals to cool the planet through solar-radiation management. Here we analyze how the unique and nontrivial risks of geoengineering strategies pose fundamental questions at the interface between science and ethics. To illustrate the importance of integrated ethical and scientific analysis, we define key open questions and outline a coupled scientific-ethical research agenda to analyze solar-radiation management geoengineering proposals. We identify nine key fields of coupled research including whether solar-radiation management can be tested, how quickly learning could occur, normative decisions embedded in how different climate trajectories are valued, and justice issues regarding distribution of the harms and benefits of geoengineering. To ensure that ethical analyses are coupled with scientific analyses of this form of geoengineering, we advocate that funding agencies recognize the essential nature of this coupled research by establishing an Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications program for solar-radiation management.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)136-157
Number of pages22
JournalEthics, Policy and Environment
Volume15
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 13 2012

Fingerprint

solar radiation
management
greenhouse gas
ethics
credibility
climate change
planet
confidence
learning
funding
justice
trajectory
moral philosophy
climate
analysis
Research Agenda
Ethical Analysis
Radiation
Scientific Analysis
science

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Philosophy
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Tuana, Nancy A. ; Sriver, Ryan L. ; Svoboda, Toby ; Olson, Roman ; Irvine, Peter J. ; Haqq-Misra, Jacob ; Keller, Klaus. / Towards Integrated Ethical and Scientific Analysis of Geoengineering : A Research Agenda. In: Ethics, Policy and Environment. 2012 ; Vol. 15, No. 2. pp. 136-157.
@article{66cea563498d4f2d838b34614ff28079,
title = "Towards Integrated Ethical and Scientific Analysis of Geoengineering: A Research Agenda",
abstract = "Concerns about the risks of unmitigated greenhouse gas emissions are growing. At the same time, confidence that international policy agreements will succeed in considerably lowering anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions is declining. Perhaps as a result, various geoengineering solutions are gaining attention and credibility as a way to manage climate change. Serious consideration is currently being given to proposals to cool the planet through solar-radiation management. Here we analyze how the unique and nontrivial risks of geoengineering strategies pose fundamental questions at the interface between science and ethics. To illustrate the importance of integrated ethical and scientific analysis, we define key open questions and outline a coupled scientific-ethical research agenda to analyze solar-radiation management geoengineering proposals. We identify nine key fields of coupled research including whether solar-radiation management can be tested, how quickly learning could occur, normative decisions embedded in how different climate trajectories are valued, and justice issues regarding distribution of the harms and benefits of geoengineering. To ensure that ethical analyses are coupled with scientific analyses of this form of geoengineering, we advocate that funding agencies recognize the essential nature of this coupled research by establishing an Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications program for solar-radiation management.",
author = "Tuana, {Nancy A.} and Sriver, {Ryan L.} and Toby Svoboda and Roman Olson and Irvine, {Peter J.} and Jacob Haqq-Misra and Klaus Keller",
year = "2012",
month = "8",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1080/21550085.2012.685557",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "136--157",
journal = "Ethics, Policy and Environment",
issn = "2155-0085",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

Towards Integrated Ethical and Scientific Analysis of Geoengineering : A Research Agenda. / Tuana, Nancy A.; Sriver, Ryan L.; Svoboda, Toby; Olson, Roman; Irvine, Peter J.; Haqq-Misra, Jacob; Keller, Klaus.

In: Ethics, Policy and Environment, Vol. 15, No. 2, 13.08.2012, p. 136-157.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Towards Integrated Ethical and Scientific Analysis of Geoengineering

T2 - A Research Agenda

AU - Tuana, Nancy A.

AU - Sriver, Ryan L.

AU - Svoboda, Toby

AU - Olson, Roman

AU - Irvine, Peter J.

AU - Haqq-Misra, Jacob

AU - Keller, Klaus

PY - 2012/8/13

Y1 - 2012/8/13

N2 - Concerns about the risks of unmitigated greenhouse gas emissions are growing. At the same time, confidence that international policy agreements will succeed in considerably lowering anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions is declining. Perhaps as a result, various geoengineering solutions are gaining attention and credibility as a way to manage climate change. Serious consideration is currently being given to proposals to cool the planet through solar-radiation management. Here we analyze how the unique and nontrivial risks of geoengineering strategies pose fundamental questions at the interface between science and ethics. To illustrate the importance of integrated ethical and scientific analysis, we define key open questions and outline a coupled scientific-ethical research agenda to analyze solar-radiation management geoengineering proposals. We identify nine key fields of coupled research including whether solar-radiation management can be tested, how quickly learning could occur, normative decisions embedded in how different climate trajectories are valued, and justice issues regarding distribution of the harms and benefits of geoengineering. To ensure that ethical analyses are coupled with scientific analyses of this form of geoengineering, we advocate that funding agencies recognize the essential nature of this coupled research by establishing an Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications program for solar-radiation management.

AB - Concerns about the risks of unmitigated greenhouse gas emissions are growing. At the same time, confidence that international policy agreements will succeed in considerably lowering anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions is declining. Perhaps as a result, various geoengineering solutions are gaining attention and credibility as a way to manage climate change. Serious consideration is currently being given to proposals to cool the planet through solar-radiation management. Here we analyze how the unique and nontrivial risks of geoengineering strategies pose fundamental questions at the interface between science and ethics. To illustrate the importance of integrated ethical and scientific analysis, we define key open questions and outline a coupled scientific-ethical research agenda to analyze solar-radiation management geoengineering proposals. We identify nine key fields of coupled research including whether solar-radiation management can be tested, how quickly learning could occur, normative decisions embedded in how different climate trajectories are valued, and justice issues regarding distribution of the harms and benefits of geoengineering. To ensure that ethical analyses are coupled with scientific analyses of this form of geoengineering, we advocate that funding agencies recognize the essential nature of this coupled research by establishing an Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications program for solar-radiation management.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864698197&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864698197&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/21550085.2012.685557

DO - 10.1080/21550085.2012.685557

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84864698197

VL - 15

SP - 136

EP - 157

JO - Ethics, Policy and Environment

JF - Ethics, Policy and Environment

SN - 2155-0085

IS - 2

ER -