Traditional formation scenarios fail to explain 4:3 mean motion resonances

Hanno Rein, Matthew J. Payne, Dimitri Veras, Eric B. Ford

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

At least two multi-planetary systems in a 4:3 mean motion resonance have been found by radial velocity surveys.1 These planets are gas giants and the systems are only stable when protected by a resonance. Additionally the Kepler mission has detected atleast four strong candidate planetary systems with a period ratio close to 4:3. This paper investigates traditional dynamical scenarios for the formation of these systems. We systematically study migration scenarios with both N-body and hydrodynamic simulations. We investigate scenarios involving the in situ formation of two planets in resonance. We look at the results from finely tuned planet-planet scattering simulations with gas disc damping. Finally, we investigate a formation scenario involving isolation-mass embryos. Although the combined planet-planet scattering and damping scenario seems promising, none of the above scenarios is successful in forming enough systems in 4:3 resonance with planetary masses similar to the observed ones. This is a negative result but it has important implications for planet formation. Previous studies were successful in forming 2:1 and 3:2 resonances. This is generally believed to be evidence of planet migration. We highlight the main differences between those studies and our failure in forming a 4:3 resonance. We also speculate on more exotic and complicated ideas. These results will guide future investigators towards exploring the above scenarios and alternative mechanisms in a more general framework.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationRelativity in Fundamental Astronomy
Subtitle of host publicationDynamics, Reference Frames, and Data Analysis
EditorsSergei A. Klioner, Michael H. Soffel, P. Kenneth Seidelmann
Pages187-202
Number of pages16
EditionS261
StatePublished - Apr 1 2009

Publication series

NameProceedings of the International Astronomical Union
NumberS261
Volume5
ISSN (Print)1743-9213
ISSN (Electronic)1743-9221

    Fingerprint

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Nutrition and Dietetics
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Space and Planetary Science

Cite this

Rein, H., Payne, M. J., Veras, D., & Ford, E. B. (2009). Traditional formation scenarios fail to explain 4:3 mean motion resonances. In S. A. Klioner, M. H. Soffel, & P. K. Seidelmann (Eds.), Relativity in Fundamental Astronomy: Dynamics, Reference Frames, and Data Analysis (S261 ed., pp. 187-202). (Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union; Vol. 5, No. S261).