Traffic safety and the switch to a primary seat belt law

The California experience

David J. Houston, Lilliard Richardson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study explores whether the change of an existing seat belt law from secondary to primary enforcement enhances traffic safety. In particular, we examine traffic fatalities and injuries in California from 1988 to 1997. During the first half of this period, California law provided for secondary enforcement of its mandatory seat belt law, but in 1993 it upgraded the law to primary enforcement. Controlling for the number of motor vehicle collisions, a Box-Tiao intervention analysis of the time series is used to compare the monthly fatalities and injuries before and after the change in the enforcement provision. The results show that California experienced an improvement in traffic safety in terms of a significant reduction in injuries, but the change in enforcement provision had no statistically significant impact on fatalities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)743-751
Number of pages9
JournalAccident Analysis and Prevention
Volume34
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2002

Fingerprint

Seat Belts
traffic safety
Switches
Safety
Law
Wounds and Injuries
Time series
experience
Motor Vehicles
motor vehicle
time series
traffic

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

@article{f48c6f9cd28e41f982318f37f15ee915,
title = "Traffic safety and the switch to a primary seat belt law: The California experience",
abstract = "This study explores whether the change of an existing seat belt law from secondary to primary enforcement enhances traffic safety. In particular, we examine traffic fatalities and injuries in California from 1988 to 1997. During the first half of this period, California law provided for secondary enforcement of its mandatory seat belt law, but in 1993 it upgraded the law to primary enforcement. Controlling for the number of motor vehicle collisions, a Box-Tiao intervention analysis of the time series is used to compare the monthly fatalities and injuries before and after the change in the enforcement provision. The results show that California experienced an improvement in traffic safety in terms of a significant reduction in injuries, but the change in enforcement provision had no statistically significant impact on fatalities.",
author = "Houston, {David J.} and Lilliard Richardson",
year = "2002",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0001-4575(01)00074-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "743--751",
journal = "Accident Analysis and Prevention",
issn = "0001-4575",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "6",

}

Traffic safety and the switch to a primary seat belt law : The California experience. / Houston, David J.; Richardson, Lilliard.

In: Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 34, No. 6, 01.11.2002, p. 743-751.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Traffic safety and the switch to a primary seat belt law

T2 - The California experience

AU - Houston, David J.

AU - Richardson, Lilliard

PY - 2002/11/1

Y1 - 2002/11/1

N2 - This study explores whether the change of an existing seat belt law from secondary to primary enforcement enhances traffic safety. In particular, we examine traffic fatalities and injuries in California from 1988 to 1997. During the first half of this period, California law provided for secondary enforcement of its mandatory seat belt law, but in 1993 it upgraded the law to primary enforcement. Controlling for the number of motor vehicle collisions, a Box-Tiao intervention analysis of the time series is used to compare the monthly fatalities and injuries before and after the change in the enforcement provision. The results show that California experienced an improvement in traffic safety in terms of a significant reduction in injuries, but the change in enforcement provision had no statistically significant impact on fatalities.

AB - This study explores whether the change of an existing seat belt law from secondary to primary enforcement enhances traffic safety. In particular, we examine traffic fatalities and injuries in California from 1988 to 1997. During the first half of this period, California law provided for secondary enforcement of its mandatory seat belt law, but in 1993 it upgraded the law to primary enforcement. Controlling for the number of motor vehicle collisions, a Box-Tiao intervention analysis of the time series is used to compare the monthly fatalities and injuries before and after the change in the enforcement provision. The results show that California experienced an improvement in traffic safety in terms of a significant reduction in injuries, but the change in enforcement provision had no statistically significant impact on fatalities.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036826980&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036826980&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0001-4575(01)00074-4

DO - 10.1016/S0001-4575(01)00074-4

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 743

EP - 751

JO - Accident Analysis and Prevention

JF - Accident Analysis and Prevention

SN - 0001-4575

IS - 6

ER -