Training current and future robotic surgeons simultaneously

Initial experiences with safety and efficiency

Ryan M. Juza, Randy Haluck, Eugene J. Won, Laura M. Enomoto, Eric Pauli, Ann Rogers, Vinay Singhal, Tung Tran, Stephanie Estes, Jerome Lyn-Sue

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Robotic surgery is experiencing a rapidly-increasing presence in the field of general surgery. The adoption of any new technology carries the challenge of training current and future surgeons in a safe and effective manner. We report our experience with the initiation of a robotic general surgery program at an academic institution while simultaneously incorporating surgical trainees. The initial procedure performed was robotic-assisted cholecystectomy (RAC). Concurrent with the introduction of a robotic general surgical program, our institution implemented a progressive surgical trainee curriculum for all active residents and fellows. Immediately after being credentialed to perform RAC, attending surgeons began incorporating surgical trainees into robotic procedures. We retrospectively reviewed our first 50 RACs and compared them with our previous 50 standard laparoscopic cholecystectomies (SLC) to determine the impact of rapid integration of surgical trainees on developing technologies. Despite new technology and novice surgeons, there was no difference in mean operative time between the SLC and RAC groups (75.3 vs. 84.1 min, p = 0.077). Two patients in the robotic-assisted group required intraoperative conversion. Hospital length of stay was similar between groups, with the majority of patients leaving the same day. There were no postoperative complications in either group. A robotic general surgery program can be initiated while concurrently instructing surgical trainees on robotic surgery in a safe and efficient manner. We report our initial experience with the adoption of this rapidly advancing technology and describe our training model.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)227-231
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Robotic Surgery
Volume8
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Robotics
Safety
Cholecystectomy
Technology
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Length of Stay
Surgeons
Operative Time
Curriculum

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Health Informatics

Cite this

@article{94286e239ad2456e86dc535636b13d2f,
title = "Training current and future robotic surgeons simultaneously: Initial experiences with safety and efficiency",
abstract = "Robotic surgery is experiencing a rapidly-increasing presence in the field of general surgery. The adoption of any new technology carries the challenge of training current and future surgeons in a safe and effective manner. We report our experience with the initiation of a robotic general surgery program at an academic institution while simultaneously incorporating surgical trainees. The initial procedure performed was robotic-assisted cholecystectomy (RAC). Concurrent with the introduction of a robotic general surgical program, our institution implemented a progressive surgical trainee curriculum for all active residents and fellows. Immediately after being credentialed to perform RAC, attending surgeons began incorporating surgical trainees into robotic procedures. We retrospectively reviewed our first 50 RACs and compared them with our previous 50 standard laparoscopic cholecystectomies (SLC) to determine the impact of rapid integration of surgical trainees on developing technologies. Despite new technology and novice surgeons, there was no difference in mean operative time between the SLC and RAC groups (75.3 vs. 84.1 min, p = 0.077). Two patients in the robotic-assisted group required intraoperative conversion. Hospital length of stay was similar between groups, with the majority of patients leaving the same day. There were no postoperative complications in either group. A robotic general surgery program can be initiated while concurrently instructing surgical trainees on robotic surgery in a safe and efficient manner. We report our initial experience with the adoption of this rapidly advancing technology and describe our training model.",
author = "Juza, {Ryan M.} and Randy Haluck and Won, {Eugene J.} and Enomoto, {Laura M.} and Eric Pauli and Ann Rogers and Vinay Singhal and Tung Tran and Stephanie Estes and Jerome Lyn-Sue",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11701-014-0455-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "227--231",
journal = "Journal of Robotic Surgery",
issn = "1863-2483",
publisher = "Springer London",
number = "3",

}

Training current and future robotic surgeons simultaneously : Initial experiences with safety and efficiency. / Juza, Ryan M.; Haluck, Randy; Won, Eugene J.; Enomoto, Laura M.; Pauli, Eric; Rogers, Ann; Singhal, Vinay; Tran, Tung; Estes, Stephanie; Lyn-Sue, Jerome.

In: Journal of Robotic Surgery, Vol. 8, No. 3, 01.01.2014, p. 227-231.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Training current and future robotic surgeons simultaneously

T2 - Initial experiences with safety and efficiency

AU - Juza, Ryan M.

AU - Haluck, Randy

AU - Won, Eugene J.

AU - Enomoto, Laura M.

AU - Pauli, Eric

AU - Rogers, Ann

AU - Singhal, Vinay

AU - Tran, Tung

AU - Estes, Stephanie

AU - Lyn-Sue, Jerome

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Robotic surgery is experiencing a rapidly-increasing presence in the field of general surgery. The adoption of any new technology carries the challenge of training current and future surgeons in a safe and effective manner. We report our experience with the initiation of a robotic general surgery program at an academic institution while simultaneously incorporating surgical trainees. The initial procedure performed was robotic-assisted cholecystectomy (RAC). Concurrent with the introduction of a robotic general surgical program, our institution implemented a progressive surgical trainee curriculum for all active residents and fellows. Immediately after being credentialed to perform RAC, attending surgeons began incorporating surgical trainees into robotic procedures. We retrospectively reviewed our first 50 RACs and compared them with our previous 50 standard laparoscopic cholecystectomies (SLC) to determine the impact of rapid integration of surgical trainees on developing technologies. Despite new technology and novice surgeons, there was no difference in mean operative time between the SLC and RAC groups (75.3 vs. 84.1 min, p = 0.077). Two patients in the robotic-assisted group required intraoperative conversion. Hospital length of stay was similar between groups, with the majority of patients leaving the same day. There were no postoperative complications in either group. A robotic general surgery program can be initiated while concurrently instructing surgical trainees on robotic surgery in a safe and efficient manner. We report our initial experience with the adoption of this rapidly advancing technology and describe our training model.

AB - Robotic surgery is experiencing a rapidly-increasing presence in the field of general surgery. The adoption of any new technology carries the challenge of training current and future surgeons in a safe and effective manner. We report our experience with the initiation of a robotic general surgery program at an academic institution while simultaneously incorporating surgical trainees. The initial procedure performed was robotic-assisted cholecystectomy (RAC). Concurrent with the introduction of a robotic general surgical program, our institution implemented a progressive surgical trainee curriculum for all active residents and fellows. Immediately after being credentialed to perform RAC, attending surgeons began incorporating surgical trainees into robotic procedures. We retrospectively reviewed our first 50 RACs and compared them with our previous 50 standard laparoscopic cholecystectomies (SLC) to determine the impact of rapid integration of surgical trainees on developing technologies. Despite new technology and novice surgeons, there was no difference in mean operative time between the SLC and RAC groups (75.3 vs. 84.1 min, p = 0.077). Two patients in the robotic-assisted group required intraoperative conversion. Hospital length of stay was similar between groups, with the majority of patients leaving the same day. There were no postoperative complications in either group. A robotic general surgery program can be initiated while concurrently instructing surgical trainees on robotic surgery in a safe and efficient manner. We report our initial experience with the adoption of this rapidly advancing technology and describe our training model.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906267348&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84906267348&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11701-014-0455-2

DO - 10.1007/s11701-014-0455-2

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 227

EP - 231

JO - Journal of Robotic Surgery

JF - Journal of Robotic Surgery

SN - 1863-2483

IS - 3

ER -