Training in obstetric sonography for radiology residents and fellows in the United States

Claudia Kasales, C. C. Coulson, David Mauger, J. D. Chertoff, A. Matthews

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to assess the current experience of radiology residents and fellows in obstetric sonography. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Written surveys were sent to the directors of 206 accredited radiology residency programs and 85 fellowship programs in the United States. The surveys encompassed obstetric sonographic experience during routine working hours and after hours, the level of supervision, the types of scanning performed, and the extent of formal lectures available during training. Additional questions concerned the relative knowledge of laboratory accreditation processes and training of faculty covering obstetric sonography. RESULTS. Sixty (29%) of 206 accredited radiology residency programs and 24 (28%) of 85 fellowship programs returned surveys. The experience among residency programs was similar, providing fewer than 4 weeks per year of obstetric sonography, usually within their own department of radiology. Residents were more likely to be sent to outside departments for second or third trimester sonography experience. A decrease in scanning assistance was reported for examinations performed after hours, more so for second or third trimester studies. Lecture topics revealed similar deficiencies for residency and fellowship programs. CONCLUSION. Greater emphasis on the performance of prenatal sonographic examinations may be warranted during formal sonography rotations. Current levels of experience in obstetric sonography may not be providing sufficient experience to allow residents to appropriately manage call cases or for practicing radiologists to provide such services after their training is completed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)763-767
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Roentgenology
Volume177
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001

Fingerprint

Radiology
Obstetrics
Ultrasonography
Internship and Residency
Third Pregnancy Trimester
Second Pregnancy Trimester
Accreditation
Surveys and Questionnaires

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Kasales, Claudia ; Coulson, C. C. ; Mauger, David ; Chertoff, J. D. ; Matthews, A. / Training in obstetric sonography for radiology residents and fellows in the United States. In: American Journal of Roentgenology. 2001 ; Vol. 177, No. 4. pp. 763-767.
@article{5093a5bcdfdb41f686bad2e953160a12,
title = "Training in obstetric sonography for radiology residents and fellows in the United States",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to assess the current experience of radiology residents and fellows in obstetric sonography. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Written surveys were sent to the directors of 206 accredited radiology residency programs and 85 fellowship programs in the United States. The surveys encompassed obstetric sonographic experience during routine working hours and after hours, the level of supervision, the types of scanning performed, and the extent of formal lectures available during training. Additional questions concerned the relative knowledge of laboratory accreditation processes and training of faculty covering obstetric sonography. RESULTS. Sixty (29{\%}) of 206 accredited radiology residency programs and 24 (28{\%}) of 85 fellowship programs returned surveys. The experience among residency programs was similar, providing fewer than 4 weeks per year of obstetric sonography, usually within their own department of radiology. Residents were more likely to be sent to outside departments for second or third trimester sonography experience. A decrease in scanning assistance was reported for examinations performed after hours, more so for second or third trimester studies. Lecture topics revealed similar deficiencies for residency and fellowship programs. CONCLUSION. Greater emphasis on the performance of prenatal sonographic examinations may be warranted during formal sonography rotations. Current levels of experience in obstetric sonography may not be providing sufficient experience to allow residents to appropriately manage call cases or for practicing radiologists to provide such services after their training is completed.",
author = "Claudia Kasales and Coulson, {C. C.} and David Mauger and Chertoff, {J. D.} and A. Matthews",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2214/ajr.177.4.1770763",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "177",
pages = "763--767",
journal = "American Journal of Roentgenology",
issn = "0361-803X",
publisher = "American Roentgen Ray Society",
number = "4",

}

Training in obstetric sonography for radiology residents and fellows in the United States. / Kasales, Claudia; Coulson, C. C.; Mauger, David; Chertoff, J. D.; Matthews, A.

In: American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 177, No. 4, 01.01.2001, p. 763-767.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Training in obstetric sonography for radiology residents and fellows in the United States

AU - Kasales, Claudia

AU - Coulson, C. C.

AU - Mauger, David

AU - Chertoff, J. D.

AU - Matthews, A.

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to assess the current experience of radiology residents and fellows in obstetric sonography. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Written surveys were sent to the directors of 206 accredited radiology residency programs and 85 fellowship programs in the United States. The surveys encompassed obstetric sonographic experience during routine working hours and after hours, the level of supervision, the types of scanning performed, and the extent of formal lectures available during training. Additional questions concerned the relative knowledge of laboratory accreditation processes and training of faculty covering obstetric sonography. RESULTS. Sixty (29%) of 206 accredited radiology residency programs and 24 (28%) of 85 fellowship programs returned surveys. The experience among residency programs was similar, providing fewer than 4 weeks per year of obstetric sonography, usually within their own department of radiology. Residents were more likely to be sent to outside departments for second or third trimester sonography experience. A decrease in scanning assistance was reported for examinations performed after hours, more so for second or third trimester studies. Lecture topics revealed similar deficiencies for residency and fellowship programs. CONCLUSION. Greater emphasis on the performance of prenatal sonographic examinations may be warranted during formal sonography rotations. Current levels of experience in obstetric sonography may not be providing sufficient experience to allow residents to appropriately manage call cases or for practicing radiologists to provide such services after their training is completed.

AB - OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to assess the current experience of radiology residents and fellows in obstetric sonography. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Written surveys were sent to the directors of 206 accredited radiology residency programs and 85 fellowship programs in the United States. The surveys encompassed obstetric sonographic experience during routine working hours and after hours, the level of supervision, the types of scanning performed, and the extent of formal lectures available during training. Additional questions concerned the relative knowledge of laboratory accreditation processes and training of faculty covering obstetric sonography. RESULTS. Sixty (29%) of 206 accredited radiology residency programs and 24 (28%) of 85 fellowship programs returned surveys. The experience among residency programs was similar, providing fewer than 4 weeks per year of obstetric sonography, usually within their own department of radiology. Residents were more likely to be sent to outside departments for second or third trimester sonography experience. A decrease in scanning assistance was reported for examinations performed after hours, more so for second or third trimester studies. Lecture topics revealed similar deficiencies for residency and fellowship programs. CONCLUSION. Greater emphasis on the performance of prenatal sonographic examinations may be warranted during formal sonography rotations. Current levels of experience in obstetric sonography may not be providing sufficient experience to allow residents to appropriately manage call cases or for practicing radiologists to provide such services after their training is completed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034821736&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034821736&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2214/ajr.177.4.1770763

DO - 10.2214/ajr.177.4.1770763

M3 - Article

C2 - 11566669

AN - SCOPUS:0034821736

VL - 177

SP - 763

EP - 767

JO - American Journal of Roentgenology

JF - American Journal of Roentgenology

SN - 0361-803X

IS - 4

ER -