Transitional identity as a facilitator of organizational identity change during a merger

Shawn M. Clark, Dennis Arnold Gioia, David J. Ketchen, James B. Thomas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

172 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We adopted an interpretive, grounded theory approach to study the processes by which organizational identities changed during the initial phases of a merger between two formerly rival healthcare organizations. Our investigation of two top management teams attempting to instigate this major change effort and lead their organizations toward completion of the merger revealed that the emergence of a transitional identity-an interim sense held by members about what their organizations were becoming-was critical to moving the change process forward. The transitional identity allowed executives in the two organizations to suspend their preexisting organizational identities and work toward creating a shared, new identity. The transitional identity appears to have been effective because it was ambiguous enough to allow multiple interpretations of what the merged organization would become to eventually coalesce into a common understanding, but not so ambiguous as to be threateningly unfamiliar. Overall, we present a process model of organizational identity change during a major change event that spanned two organizations, with the concept of transitional identity as its centerpiece.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)397-438
Number of pages42
JournalAdministrative Science Quarterly
Volume55
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2010

Fingerprint

merger
Organizational Identity
Mergers
grounded theory
organization
interpretation
event
management

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration

Cite this

@article{d5f0db9312534305a658d06088a61b62,
title = "Transitional identity as a facilitator of organizational identity change during a merger",
abstract = "We adopted an interpretive, grounded theory approach to study the processes by which organizational identities changed during the initial phases of a merger between two formerly rival healthcare organizations. Our investigation of two top management teams attempting to instigate this major change effort and lead their organizations toward completion of the merger revealed that the emergence of a transitional identity-an interim sense held by members about what their organizations were becoming-was critical to moving the change process forward. The transitional identity allowed executives in the two organizations to suspend their preexisting organizational identities and work toward creating a shared, new identity. The transitional identity appears to have been effective because it was ambiguous enough to allow multiple interpretations of what the merged organization would become to eventually coalesce into a common understanding, but not so ambiguous as to be threateningly unfamiliar. Overall, we present a process model of organizational identity change during a major change event that spanned two organizations, with the concept of transitional identity as its centerpiece.",
author = "Clark, {Shawn M.} and Gioia, {Dennis Arnold} and Ketchen, {David J.} and Thomas, {James B.}",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2189/asqu.2010.55.3.397",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "55",
pages = "397--438",
journal = "Administrative Science Quarterly",
issn = "0001-8392",
publisher = "Johnson School at Cornell University",
number = "3",

}

Transitional identity as a facilitator of organizational identity change during a merger. / Clark, Shawn M.; Gioia, Dennis Arnold; Ketchen, David J.; Thomas, James B.

In: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 55, No. 3, 01.09.2010, p. 397-438.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transitional identity as a facilitator of organizational identity change during a merger

AU - Clark, Shawn M.

AU - Gioia, Dennis Arnold

AU - Ketchen, David J.

AU - Thomas, James B.

PY - 2010/9/1

Y1 - 2010/9/1

N2 - We adopted an interpretive, grounded theory approach to study the processes by which organizational identities changed during the initial phases of a merger between two formerly rival healthcare organizations. Our investigation of two top management teams attempting to instigate this major change effort and lead their organizations toward completion of the merger revealed that the emergence of a transitional identity-an interim sense held by members about what their organizations were becoming-was critical to moving the change process forward. The transitional identity allowed executives in the two organizations to suspend their preexisting organizational identities and work toward creating a shared, new identity. The transitional identity appears to have been effective because it was ambiguous enough to allow multiple interpretations of what the merged organization would become to eventually coalesce into a common understanding, but not so ambiguous as to be threateningly unfamiliar. Overall, we present a process model of organizational identity change during a major change event that spanned two organizations, with the concept of transitional identity as its centerpiece.

AB - We adopted an interpretive, grounded theory approach to study the processes by which organizational identities changed during the initial phases of a merger between two formerly rival healthcare organizations. Our investigation of two top management teams attempting to instigate this major change effort and lead their organizations toward completion of the merger revealed that the emergence of a transitional identity-an interim sense held by members about what their organizations were becoming-was critical to moving the change process forward. The transitional identity allowed executives in the two organizations to suspend their preexisting organizational identities and work toward creating a shared, new identity. The transitional identity appears to have been effective because it was ambiguous enough to allow multiple interpretations of what the merged organization would become to eventually coalesce into a common understanding, but not so ambiguous as to be threateningly unfamiliar. Overall, we present a process model of organizational identity change during a major change event that spanned two organizations, with the concept of transitional identity as its centerpiece.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78549282786&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78549282786&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2189/asqu.2010.55.3.397

DO - 10.2189/asqu.2010.55.3.397

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 397

EP - 438

JO - Administrative Science Quarterly

JF - Administrative Science Quarterly

SN - 0001-8392

IS - 3

ER -