Transnational Climate Governance Networks and Domestic Regulatory Action

Xun Cao, Hugh Ward

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Transnational climate governance (TCG) creates networks between countries as governments and other organizations enter joint arrangements to further their interests. We argue that actors build TCG, rather than focusing on promoting change at the domestic level, when this is a more efficient way of using their limited resources than lobbying to increase the level of domestic regulation. Based on standard microeconomic theory, we show that actors will respond to higher existing levels of domestic regulation by participating more in TCG because the existence of such domestic legislation frees up resources for them to use in other ways, including activities at the transnational level. We carry out an empirical test based on the strength of the network ties between countries formed by TCG. Results support our main hypothesis on the positive relationship between a country’s level of domestic policy output and its participation in TCGs, suggesting that national policies and TCGs are more complements than substitutes as instruments to address global climate change.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)76-102
Number of pages27
JournalInternational Interactions
Volume43
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2 2017

Fingerprint

climate
governance
regulation
domestic policy
microeconomics
resources
climate change
legislation
participation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

@article{f1528c6293d44e928f6af0913fb94db2,
title = "Transnational Climate Governance Networks and Domestic Regulatory Action",
abstract = "Transnational climate governance (TCG) creates networks between countries as governments and other organizations enter joint arrangements to further their interests. We argue that actors build TCG, rather than focusing on promoting change at the domestic level, when this is a more efficient way of using their limited resources than lobbying to increase the level of domestic regulation. Based on standard microeconomic theory, we show that actors will respond to higher existing levels of domestic regulation by participating more in TCG because the existence of such domestic legislation frees up resources for them to use in other ways, including activities at the transnational level. We carry out an empirical test based on the strength of the network ties between countries formed by TCG. Results support our main hypothesis on the positive relationship between a country’s level of domestic policy output and its participation in TCGs, suggesting that national policies and TCGs are more complements than substitutes as instruments to address global climate change.",
author = "Xun Cao and Hugh Ward",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/03050629.2016.1220162",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "76--102",
journal = "International Interactions",
issn = "0305-0629",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

Transnational Climate Governance Networks and Domestic Regulatory Action. / Cao, Xun; Ward, Hugh.

In: International Interactions, Vol. 43, No. 1, 02.01.2017, p. 76-102.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transnational Climate Governance Networks and Domestic Regulatory Action

AU - Cao, Xun

AU - Ward, Hugh

PY - 2017/1/2

Y1 - 2017/1/2

N2 - Transnational climate governance (TCG) creates networks between countries as governments and other organizations enter joint arrangements to further their interests. We argue that actors build TCG, rather than focusing on promoting change at the domestic level, when this is a more efficient way of using their limited resources than lobbying to increase the level of domestic regulation. Based on standard microeconomic theory, we show that actors will respond to higher existing levels of domestic regulation by participating more in TCG because the existence of such domestic legislation frees up resources for them to use in other ways, including activities at the transnational level. We carry out an empirical test based on the strength of the network ties between countries formed by TCG. Results support our main hypothesis on the positive relationship between a country’s level of domestic policy output and its participation in TCGs, suggesting that national policies and TCGs are more complements than substitutes as instruments to address global climate change.

AB - Transnational climate governance (TCG) creates networks between countries as governments and other organizations enter joint arrangements to further their interests. We argue that actors build TCG, rather than focusing on promoting change at the domestic level, when this is a more efficient way of using their limited resources than lobbying to increase the level of domestic regulation. Based on standard microeconomic theory, we show that actors will respond to higher existing levels of domestic regulation by participating more in TCG because the existence of such domestic legislation frees up resources for them to use in other ways, including activities at the transnational level. We carry out an empirical test based on the strength of the network ties between countries formed by TCG. Results support our main hypothesis on the positive relationship between a country’s level of domestic policy output and its participation in TCGs, suggesting that national policies and TCGs are more complements than substitutes as instruments to address global climate change.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84982297894&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84982297894&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/03050629.2016.1220162

DO - 10.1080/03050629.2016.1220162

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84982297894

VL - 43

SP - 76

EP - 102

JO - International Interactions

JF - International Interactions

SN - 0305-0629

IS - 1

ER -