Trends in urban forestry practices, programs, and sustainability: Contrasting a pennsylvania, U.S., study

William F. Elmendorf, Vincent J. Cotrone, Joseph T. Mullen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Previous studies provided criteria and guidelines both for measuring and increasing the sustainability of urban forests. These studies have also provided evidence that difficulties existed in completing important practices (e.g., inventories, street tree ordinances, management plans), which contribute to both better urban forest programs and sustainability. In a recent study of both small town tree commissions and programs in northeastern Pennsylvania U.S., there was a marked difference between tree commission members' attitudes toward urban forestry practices and the successful completion of them. Focus groups composed of tree commission members were used to gather information on why these differences existed. Our northeastern Pennsylvania study provided evidence that local tree commissions had difficulties completing urban forestry practices for a number of reasons, including a lack of volunteer time and a need for additional support and assistance. The study also showed that small town tree commissioners viewed and defined urban forest sustainability much more practically than has been expressed in the extant literature. Questions continue about how well local urban forestry practices support sustainable urban forest programs and resources.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)237-247
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Arboriculture
Volume29
Issue number4
StatePublished - Jul 2003

Fingerprint

urban forestry
forestry practice
silvicultural practices
sustainability
towns
small town
street trees
focus groups
volunteers
programme
trend
resource

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Ecology
  • Forestry

Cite this

@article{d57fffe9003340108de4f28c7ac4bf05,
title = "Trends in urban forestry practices, programs, and sustainability: Contrasting a pennsylvania, U.S., study",
abstract = "Previous studies provided criteria and guidelines both for measuring and increasing the sustainability of urban forests. These studies have also provided evidence that difficulties existed in completing important practices (e.g., inventories, street tree ordinances, management plans), which contribute to both better urban forest programs and sustainability. In a recent study of both small town tree commissions and programs in northeastern Pennsylvania U.S., there was a marked difference between tree commission members' attitudes toward urban forestry practices and the successful completion of them. Focus groups composed of tree commission members were used to gather information on why these differences existed. Our northeastern Pennsylvania study provided evidence that local tree commissions had difficulties completing urban forestry practices for a number of reasons, including a lack of volunteer time and a need for additional support and assistance. The study also showed that small town tree commissioners viewed and defined urban forest sustainability much more practically than has been expressed in the extant literature. Questions continue about how well local urban forestry practices support sustainable urban forest programs and resources.",
author = "Elmendorf, {William F.} and Cotrone, {Vincent J.} and Mullen, {Joseph T.}",
year = "2003",
month = "7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "237--247",
journal = "Arboriculture and Urban Forestry",
issn = "1935-5297",
publisher = "International Society of Arboriculture",
number = "4",

}

Trends in urban forestry practices, programs, and sustainability : Contrasting a pennsylvania, U.S., study. / Elmendorf, William F.; Cotrone, Vincent J.; Mullen, Joseph T.

In: Journal of Arboriculture, Vol. 29, No. 4, 07.2003, p. 237-247.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trends in urban forestry practices, programs, and sustainability

T2 - Contrasting a pennsylvania, U.S., study

AU - Elmendorf, William F.

AU - Cotrone, Vincent J.

AU - Mullen, Joseph T.

PY - 2003/7

Y1 - 2003/7

N2 - Previous studies provided criteria and guidelines both for measuring and increasing the sustainability of urban forests. These studies have also provided evidence that difficulties existed in completing important practices (e.g., inventories, street tree ordinances, management plans), which contribute to both better urban forest programs and sustainability. In a recent study of both small town tree commissions and programs in northeastern Pennsylvania U.S., there was a marked difference between tree commission members' attitudes toward urban forestry practices and the successful completion of them. Focus groups composed of tree commission members were used to gather information on why these differences existed. Our northeastern Pennsylvania study provided evidence that local tree commissions had difficulties completing urban forestry practices for a number of reasons, including a lack of volunteer time and a need for additional support and assistance. The study also showed that small town tree commissioners viewed and defined urban forest sustainability much more practically than has been expressed in the extant literature. Questions continue about how well local urban forestry practices support sustainable urban forest programs and resources.

AB - Previous studies provided criteria and guidelines both for measuring and increasing the sustainability of urban forests. These studies have also provided evidence that difficulties existed in completing important practices (e.g., inventories, street tree ordinances, management plans), which contribute to both better urban forest programs and sustainability. In a recent study of both small town tree commissions and programs in northeastern Pennsylvania U.S., there was a marked difference between tree commission members' attitudes toward urban forestry practices and the successful completion of them. Focus groups composed of tree commission members were used to gather information on why these differences existed. Our northeastern Pennsylvania study provided evidence that local tree commissions had difficulties completing urban forestry practices for a number of reasons, including a lack of volunteer time and a need for additional support and assistance. The study also showed that small town tree commissioners viewed and defined urban forest sustainability much more practically than has been expressed in the extant literature. Questions continue about how well local urban forestry practices support sustainable urban forest programs and resources.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3142657433&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3142657433&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:3142657433

VL - 29

SP - 237

EP - 247

JO - Arboriculture and Urban Forestry

JF - Arboriculture and Urban Forestry

SN - 1935-5297

IS - 4

ER -