Trust in computers and robots

The uses and boundaries of the analogy to interpersonal trust

David Atkinson, Peter Hancock, Robert R. Hoffman, John D. Lee, Ericka Rovira, Charlene Stokes, Alan Richard Wagner

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Trust is a complex concept having many meanings and hinting at many variables, and is not a single concept, or state, or continuum. Panelists will briefly argue their stances concerning concepts of trust in automation, and whether (or to what extent) our understanding of trust in automation should be addressed by analogy to interpersonal trust. There is considerable divergence of opinion on these matters, and on the question of whether it is possible for robots to engage in trustworthy relations with humans.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 56th Annual Meeting, HFES 2012
Pages303-307
Number of pages5
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2012
EventProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 56th Annual Meeting, HFES 2012 - Boston, MA, United States
Duration: Oct 22 2012Oct 26 2012

Other

OtherProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 56th Annual Meeting, HFES 2012
CountryUnited States
CityBoston, MA
Period10/22/1210/26/12

Fingerprint

robot
Automation
Robots
automation
divergence

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics

Cite this

Atkinson, D., Hancock, P., Hoffman, R. R., Lee, J. D., Rovira, E., Stokes, C., & Wagner, A. R. (2012). Trust in computers and robots: The uses and boundaries of the analogy to interpersonal trust. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 56th Annual Meeting, HFES 2012 (pp. 303-307) https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181312561071
Atkinson, David ; Hancock, Peter ; Hoffman, Robert R. ; Lee, John D. ; Rovira, Ericka ; Stokes, Charlene ; Wagner, Alan Richard. / Trust in computers and robots : The uses and boundaries of the analogy to interpersonal trust. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 56th Annual Meeting, HFES 2012. 2012. pp. 303-307
@inproceedings{f793a83f024c47c49f45a2d3cd38e2be,
title = "Trust in computers and robots: The uses and boundaries of the analogy to interpersonal trust",
abstract = "Trust is a complex concept having many meanings and hinting at many variables, and is not a single concept, or state, or continuum. Panelists will briefly argue their stances concerning concepts of trust in automation, and whether (or to what extent) our understanding of trust in automation should be addressed by analogy to interpersonal trust. There is considerable divergence of opinion on these matters, and on the question of whether it is possible for robots to engage in trustworthy relations with humans.",
author = "David Atkinson and Peter Hancock and Hoffman, {Robert R.} and Lee, {John D.} and Ericka Rovira and Charlene Stokes and Wagner, {Alan Richard}",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1071181312561071",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780945289418",
pages = "303--307",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 56th Annual Meeting, HFES 2012",

}

Atkinson, D, Hancock, P, Hoffman, RR, Lee, JD, Rovira, E, Stokes, C & Wagner, AR 2012, Trust in computers and robots: The uses and boundaries of the analogy to interpersonal trust. in Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 56th Annual Meeting, HFES 2012. pp. 303-307, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 56th Annual Meeting, HFES 2012, Boston, MA, United States, 10/22/12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181312561071

Trust in computers and robots : The uses and boundaries of the analogy to interpersonal trust. / Atkinson, David; Hancock, Peter; Hoffman, Robert R.; Lee, John D.; Rovira, Ericka; Stokes, Charlene; Wagner, Alan Richard.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 56th Annual Meeting, HFES 2012. 2012. p. 303-307.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Trust in computers and robots

T2 - The uses and boundaries of the analogy to interpersonal trust

AU - Atkinson, David

AU - Hancock, Peter

AU - Hoffman, Robert R.

AU - Lee, John D.

AU - Rovira, Ericka

AU - Stokes, Charlene

AU - Wagner, Alan Richard

PY - 2012/12/1

Y1 - 2012/12/1

N2 - Trust is a complex concept having many meanings and hinting at many variables, and is not a single concept, or state, or continuum. Panelists will briefly argue their stances concerning concepts of trust in automation, and whether (or to what extent) our understanding of trust in automation should be addressed by analogy to interpersonal trust. There is considerable divergence of opinion on these matters, and on the question of whether it is possible for robots to engage in trustworthy relations with humans.

AB - Trust is a complex concept having many meanings and hinting at many variables, and is not a single concept, or state, or continuum. Panelists will briefly argue their stances concerning concepts of trust in automation, and whether (or to what extent) our understanding of trust in automation should be addressed by analogy to interpersonal trust. There is considerable divergence of opinion on these matters, and on the question of whether it is possible for robots to engage in trustworthy relations with humans.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873421414&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873421414&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1071181312561071

DO - 10.1177/1071181312561071

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9780945289418

SP - 303

EP - 307

BT - Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 56th Annual Meeting, HFES 2012

ER -

Atkinson D, Hancock P, Hoffman RR, Lee JD, Rovira E, Stokes C et al. Trust in computers and robots: The uses and boundaries of the analogy to interpersonal trust. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 56th Annual Meeting, HFES 2012. 2012. p. 303-307 https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181312561071