Trust in whom? Dioxin, organizations, risk perception, and fish consumption in Michigan’s Saginaw Bay watershed

Joseph A. Hamm, Jeffrey G. Cox, Adam Zwickle, Jie Zhuang, Shannon Cruz, Brad L. Upham, Minwoong Chung, James W. Dearing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Trust is generally recognized as important for risk-relevant behavior but research suggests that trust in different organizations may have varying effects. This research advances the literature by testing two hypotheses which postulate that this variability can be explained by risk perception. We collected data from 351 anglers regarding their trust in nine organizations whose efforts are relevant to dioxin contamination in Michigan’s Saginaw Bay Watershed, risk perceptions, and self-reports of risky behavior (i.e. consumption of local fish identified as especially likely to contain contaminants). As hypothesized (H1), the negative effect of trust in two agencies—the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) and a Michigan Department of Health and Human Services-sponsored River Walker Program (RWP)—on risky behavior was significantly mediated by risk perception but these effects differed from each other such that trust in the MDNR was associated with increased perceptions of risk while trust in the RWP was associated with decreased perceptions of benefit. Also as hypothesized (H2), the positive effect of trust in Dow Chemical Company on risky behavior was significantly mediated by risk perception such that increased trust in Dow was associated with reduced risk perception. The current results lend credence to arguments regarding the importance of specificity in the target of trust and advance this literature by suggesting that differential effects on risk perception help explain this variability. Thus, organizations whose efforts focus on risk communication appear ideally situated to reduce risky behavior through a negative impact on risk perception. Other organizations, however, may run the risk of increasing risky behavior if their efforts result in reduced perceptions of risk.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Risk Research
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Risk perception
Watersheds
Fish
Natural resources
Rivers
natural resources
river
Fish consumption
Watershed
risk communication
Contamination
consumption behavior
Risky behavior
Health
Impurities
environmental pollution
risk behavior
Communication
Testing

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Engineering(all)
  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Hamm, Joseph A. ; Cox, Jeffrey G. ; Zwickle, Adam ; Zhuang, Jie ; Cruz, Shannon ; Upham, Brad L. ; Chung, Minwoong ; Dearing, James W. / Trust in whom? Dioxin, organizations, risk perception, and fish consumption in Michigan’s Saginaw Bay watershed. In: Journal of Risk Research. 2018.
@article{cd010ec51679410db529e42fda2480fd,
title = "Trust in whom? Dioxin, organizations, risk perception, and fish consumption in Michigan’s Saginaw Bay watershed",
abstract = "Trust is generally recognized as important for risk-relevant behavior but research suggests that trust in different organizations may have varying effects. This research advances the literature by testing two hypotheses which postulate that this variability can be explained by risk perception. We collected data from 351 anglers regarding their trust in nine organizations whose efforts are relevant to dioxin contamination in Michigan’s Saginaw Bay Watershed, risk perceptions, and self-reports of risky behavior (i.e. consumption of local fish identified as especially likely to contain contaminants). As hypothesized (H1), the negative effect of trust in two agencies—the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) and a Michigan Department of Health and Human Services-sponsored River Walker Program (RWP)—on risky behavior was significantly mediated by risk perception but these effects differed from each other such that trust in the MDNR was associated with increased perceptions of risk while trust in the RWP was associated with decreased perceptions of benefit. Also as hypothesized (H2), the positive effect of trust in Dow Chemical Company on risky behavior was significantly mediated by risk perception such that increased trust in Dow was associated with reduced risk perception. The current results lend credence to arguments regarding the importance of specificity in the target of trust and advance this literature by suggesting that differential effects on risk perception help explain this variability. Thus, organizations whose efforts focus on risk communication appear ideally situated to reduce risky behavior through a negative impact on risk perception. Other organizations, however, may run the risk of increasing risky behavior if their efforts result in reduced perceptions of risk.",
author = "Hamm, {Joseph A.} and Cox, {Jeffrey G.} and Adam Zwickle and Jie Zhuang and Shannon Cruz and Upham, {Brad L.} and Minwoong Chung and Dearing, {James W.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/13669877.2018.1501599",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Risk Research",
issn = "1366-9877",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

Trust in whom? Dioxin, organizations, risk perception, and fish consumption in Michigan’s Saginaw Bay watershed. / Hamm, Joseph A.; Cox, Jeffrey G.; Zwickle, Adam; Zhuang, Jie; Cruz, Shannon; Upham, Brad L.; Chung, Minwoong; Dearing, James W.

In: Journal of Risk Research, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trust in whom? Dioxin, organizations, risk perception, and fish consumption in Michigan’s Saginaw Bay watershed

AU - Hamm, Joseph A.

AU - Cox, Jeffrey G.

AU - Zwickle, Adam

AU - Zhuang, Jie

AU - Cruz, Shannon

AU - Upham, Brad L.

AU - Chung, Minwoong

AU - Dearing, James W.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Trust is generally recognized as important for risk-relevant behavior but research suggests that trust in different organizations may have varying effects. This research advances the literature by testing two hypotheses which postulate that this variability can be explained by risk perception. We collected data from 351 anglers regarding their trust in nine organizations whose efforts are relevant to dioxin contamination in Michigan’s Saginaw Bay Watershed, risk perceptions, and self-reports of risky behavior (i.e. consumption of local fish identified as especially likely to contain contaminants). As hypothesized (H1), the negative effect of trust in two agencies—the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) and a Michigan Department of Health and Human Services-sponsored River Walker Program (RWP)—on risky behavior was significantly mediated by risk perception but these effects differed from each other such that trust in the MDNR was associated with increased perceptions of risk while trust in the RWP was associated with decreased perceptions of benefit. Also as hypothesized (H2), the positive effect of trust in Dow Chemical Company on risky behavior was significantly mediated by risk perception such that increased trust in Dow was associated with reduced risk perception. The current results lend credence to arguments regarding the importance of specificity in the target of trust and advance this literature by suggesting that differential effects on risk perception help explain this variability. Thus, organizations whose efforts focus on risk communication appear ideally situated to reduce risky behavior through a negative impact on risk perception. Other organizations, however, may run the risk of increasing risky behavior if their efforts result in reduced perceptions of risk.

AB - Trust is generally recognized as important for risk-relevant behavior but research suggests that trust in different organizations may have varying effects. This research advances the literature by testing two hypotheses which postulate that this variability can be explained by risk perception. We collected data from 351 anglers regarding their trust in nine organizations whose efforts are relevant to dioxin contamination in Michigan’s Saginaw Bay Watershed, risk perceptions, and self-reports of risky behavior (i.e. consumption of local fish identified as especially likely to contain contaminants). As hypothesized (H1), the negative effect of trust in two agencies—the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) and a Michigan Department of Health and Human Services-sponsored River Walker Program (RWP)—on risky behavior was significantly mediated by risk perception but these effects differed from each other such that trust in the MDNR was associated with increased perceptions of risk while trust in the RWP was associated with decreased perceptions of benefit. Also as hypothesized (H2), the positive effect of trust in Dow Chemical Company on risky behavior was significantly mediated by risk perception such that increased trust in Dow was associated with reduced risk perception. The current results lend credence to arguments regarding the importance of specificity in the target of trust and advance this literature by suggesting that differential effects on risk perception help explain this variability. Thus, organizations whose efforts focus on risk communication appear ideally situated to reduce risky behavior through a negative impact on risk perception. Other organizations, however, may run the risk of increasing risky behavior if their efforts result in reduced perceptions of risk.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054908156&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054908156&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13669877.2018.1501599

DO - 10.1080/13669877.2018.1501599

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85054908156

JO - Journal of Risk Research

JF - Journal of Risk Research

SN - 1366-9877

ER -