Tweeting for peace: Experimental evidence from the 2016 Colombian Plebiscite

Jorge Gallego, Juan D. Martínez, Kevin Munger, Mateo Vásquez-Cortés

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The decades-long Colombian civil war nearly came to an official end with the 2016 Peace Plebiscite, which was ultimately defeated in a narrow vote. This conflict has deeply divided Colombian civil society, and non-political public figures have played a crucial role in structuring debate on the topic. To understand the mechanisms underlying the influence of members of civil society on political discussion, we performed a randomized experiment on Colombian Twitter users shortly before this election. Sampling from a pool of subjects who had been frequently tweeting about the Plebiscite, we tweeted messages that encouraged subjects to consider different aspects of the decision. We varied the identity (a general, a scientist, and a priest) of the accounts we used and the content of the messages we sent. We found little evidence that any of our interventions were successful in persuading subjects to change their attitudes. However, we show that our pro-Peace messages encouraged liberal Colombians to engage in significantly more public deliberation on the subject.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number102072
JournalElectoral Studies
Volume62
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2019

Fingerprint

plebiscite
peace
evidence
civil society
twitter
attitude change
priest
deliberation
civil war
voter
election
experiment

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Gallego, Jorge ; Martínez, Juan D. ; Munger, Kevin ; Vásquez-Cortés, Mateo. / Tweeting for peace : Experimental evidence from the 2016 Colombian Plebiscite. In: Electoral Studies. 2019 ; Vol. 62.
@article{342d7536f14e4fc499f828f0170593d0,
title = "Tweeting for peace: Experimental evidence from the 2016 Colombian Plebiscite",
abstract = "The decades-long Colombian civil war nearly came to an official end with the 2016 Peace Plebiscite, which was ultimately defeated in a narrow vote. This conflict has deeply divided Colombian civil society, and non-political public figures have played a crucial role in structuring debate on the topic. To understand the mechanisms underlying the influence of members of civil society on political discussion, we performed a randomized experiment on Colombian Twitter users shortly before this election. Sampling from a pool of subjects who had been frequently tweeting about the Plebiscite, we tweeted messages that encouraged subjects to consider different aspects of the decision. We varied the identity (a general, a scientist, and a priest) of the accounts we used and the content of the messages we sent. We found little evidence that any of our interventions were successful in persuading subjects to change their attitudes. However, we show that our pro-Peace messages encouraged liberal Colombians to engage in significantly more public deliberation on the subject.",
author = "Jorge Gallego and Mart{\'i}nez, {Juan D.} and Kevin Munger and Mateo V{\'a}squez-Cort{\'e}s",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.electstud.2019.102072",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "62",
journal = "Electoral Studies",
issn = "0261-3794",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

Tweeting for peace : Experimental evidence from the 2016 Colombian Plebiscite. / Gallego, Jorge; Martínez, Juan D.; Munger, Kevin; Vásquez-Cortés, Mateo.

In: Electoral Studies, Vol. 62, 102072, 12.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tweeting for peace

T2 - Experimental evidence from the 2016 Colombian Plebiscite

AU - Gallego, Jorge

AU - Martínez, Juan D.

AU - Munger, Kevin

AU - Vásquez-Cortés, Mateo

PY - 2019/12

Y1 - 2019/12

N2 - The decades-long Colombian civil war nearly came to an official end with the 2016 Peace Plebiscite, which was ultimately defeated in a narrow vote. This conflict has deeply divided Colombian civil society, and non-political public figures have played a crucial role in structuring debate on the topic. To understand the mechanisms underlying the influence of members of civil society on political discussion, we performed a randomized experiment on Colombian Twitter users shortly before this election. Sampling from a pool of subjects who had been frequently tweeting about the Plebiscite, we tweeted messages that encouraged subjects to consider different aspects of the decision. We varied the identity (a general, a scientist, and a priest) of the accounts we used and the content of the messages we sent. We found little evidence that any of our interventions were successful in persuading subjects to change their attitudes. However, we show that our pro-Peace messages encouraged liberal Colombians to engage in significantly more public deliberation on the subject.

AB - The decades-long Colombian civil war nearly came to an official end with the 2016 Peace Plebiscite, which was ultimately defeated in a narrow vote. This conflict has deeply divided Colombian civil society, and non-political public figures have played a crucial role in structuring debate on the topic. To understand the mechanisms underlying the influence of members of civil society on political discussion, we performed a randomized experiment on Colombian Twitter users shortly before this election. Sampling from a pool of subjects who had been frequently tweeting about the Plebiscite, we tweeted messages that encouraged subjects to consider different aspects of the decision. We varied the identity (a general, a scientist, and a priest) of the accounts we used and the content of the messages we sent. We found little evidence that any of our interventions were successful in persuading subjects to change their attitudes. However, we show that our pro-Peace messages encouraged liberal Colombians to engage in significantly more public deliberation on the subject.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073301815&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073301815&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.electstud.2019.102072

DO - 10.1016/j.electstud.2019.102072

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85073301815

VL - 62

JO - Electoral Studies

JF - Electoral Studies

SN - 0261-3794

M1 - 102072

ER -