Two sides of the same coin? Leadership and organizational culture

Melody P.M. Chong, Yufan Shang, Malika Richards, Xiji Zhu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Researchers have adopted a somewhat narrow conceptualization of organizational culture, founded on specific assumptions about the impact of founders or top leadership. The purpose of this paper is to address this research gap. Design/methodology/approach: Based on 356 Chinese employees, this paper examines the relationships between organizational culture, leadership and employee outcomes. Specifically, the paper focuses on a mediation model by looking at how different leadership processes impact the relationship between culture and outcomes. Findings: Supportive and task leadership styles and a persuasive influence strategy are correlated with team, detail and innovation cultures, respectively, and are significantly stronger than that of other leadership styles/strategies. Partial support is found for the mediating effect of task and change leadership styles, and assertive and persuasive influence strategies. Contrary to the authors’ second assumption regarding the social learning effect on outcomes, the study provides a tentative conclusion that different culture types may have different levels of strength in molding middle management and consequently influencing subordinate outcomes. The model of “culture-leadership-outcome” generally shows a similar pattern with the reverse effect of “leadership-culture-outcome.” Originality/value: This study was the first to examine the impact of organizational culture on leadership and their effect on organizational outcomes, and to compare the reverse relationship. It suggests a new model that combines social cognitive theory with concepts drawn from the social learning perspective. Both the significant and non-significant results enhance our understanding on the mediating effects of leadership and culture. The findings also enrich leadership theory because no empirical studies systematically examined the similarities and differences between style approaches and influence strategies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)975-994
Number of pages20
JournalLeadership and Organization Development Journal
Volume39
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 5 2018

Fingerprint

Organizational culture
Influence strategies
Leadership style
Employees
Social learning
Mediating effect
Middle management
Design methodology
Conceptualization
Leadership theory
Mediation
Empirical study
Social cognitive theory
Organizational outcomes
Innovation culture
Learning effect

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

Chong, Melody P.M. ; Shang, Yufan ; Richards, Malika ; Zhu, Xiji. / Two sides of the same coin? Leadership and organizational culture. In: Leadership and Organization Development Journal. 2018 ; Vol. 39, No. 8. pp. 975-994.
@article{4e35b8b2809b4583b58e108a6883c66c,
title = "Two sides of the same coin? Leadership and organizational culture",
abstract = "Purpose: Researchers have adopted a somewhat narrow conceptualization of organizational culture, founded on specific assumptions about the impact of founders or top leadership. The purpose of this paper is to address this research gap. Design/methodology/approach: Based on 356 Chinese employees, this paper examines the relationships between organizational culture, leadership and employee outcomes. Specifically, the paper focuses on a mediation model by looking at how different leadership processes impact the relationship between culture and outcomes. Findings: Supportive and task leadership styles and a persuasive influence strategy are correlated with team, detail and innovation cultures, respectively, and are significantly stronger than that of other leadership styles/strategies. Partial support is found for the mediating effect of task and change leadership styles, and assertive and persuasive influence strategies. Contrary to the authors’ second assumption regarding the social learning effect on outcomes, the study provides a tentative conclusion that different culture types may have different levels of strength in molding middle management and consequently influencing subordinate outcomes. The model of “culture-leadership-outcome” generally shows a similar pattern with the reverse effect of “leadership-culture-outcome.” Originality/value: This study was the first to examine the impact of organizational culture on leadership and their effect on organizational outcomes, and to compare the reverse relationship. It suggests a new model that combines social cognitive theory with concepts drawn from the social learning perspective. Both the significant and non-significant results enhance our understanding on the mediating effects of leadership and culture. The findings also enrich leadership theory because no empirical studies systematically examined the similarities and differences between style approaches and influence strategies.",
author = "Chong, {Melody P.M.} and Yufan Shang and Malika Richards and Xiji Zhu",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1108/LODJ-05-2017-0122",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "975--994",
journal = "Leadership and Organization Development Journal",
issn = "0143-7739",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "8",

}

Two sides of the same coin? Leadership and organizational culture. / Chong, Melody P.M.; Shang, Yufan; Richards, Malika; Zhu, Xiji.

In: Leadership and Organization Development Journal, Vol. 39, No. 8, 05.11.2018, p. 975-994.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Two sides of the same coin? Leadership and organizational culture

AU - Chong, Melody P.M.

AU - Shang, Yufan

AU - Richards, Malika

AU - Zhu, Xiji

PY - 2018/11/5

Y1 - 2018/11/5

N2 - Purpose: Researchers have adopted a somewhat narrow conceptualization of organizational culture, founded on specific assumptions about the impact of founders or top leadership. The purpose of this paper is to address this research gap. Design/methodology/approach: Based on 356 Chinese employees, this paper examines the relationships between organizational culture, leadership and employee outcomes. Specifically, the paper focuses on a mediation model by looking at how different leadership processes impact the relationship between culture and outcomes. Findings: Supportive and task leadership styles and a persuasive influence strategy are correlated with team, detail and innovation cultures, respectively, and are significantly stronger than that of other leadership styles/strategies. Partial support is found for the mediating effect of task and change leadership styles, and assertive and persuasive influence strategies. Contrary to the authors’ second assumption regarding the social learning effect on outcomes, the study provides a tentative conclusion that different culture types may have different levels of strength in molding middle management and consequently influencing subordinate outcomes. The model of “culture-leadership-outcome” generally shows a similar pattern with the reverse effect of “leadership-culture-outcome.” Originality/value: This study was the first to examine the impact of organizational culture on leadership and their effect on organizational outcomes, and to compare the reverse relationship. It suggests a new model that combines social cognitive theory with concepts drawn from the social learning perspective. Both the significant and non-significant results enhance our understanding on the mediating effects of leadership and culture. The findings also enrich leadership theory because no empirical studies systematically examined the similarities and differences between style approaches and influence strategies.

AB - Purpose: Researchers have adopted a somewhat narrow conceptualization of organizational culture, founded on specific assumptions about the impact of founders or top leadership. The purpose of this paper is to address this research gap. Design/methodology/approach: Based on 356 Chinese employees, this paper examines the relationships between organizational culture, leadership and employee outcomes. Specifically, the paper focuses on a mediation model by looking at how different leadership processes impact the relationship between culture and outcomes. Findings: Supportive and task leadership styles and a persuasive influence strategy are correlated with team, detail and innovation cultures, respectively, and are significantly stronger than that of other leadership styles/strategies. Partial support is found for the mediating effect of task and change leadership styles, and assertive and persuasive influence strategies. Contrary to the authors’ second assumption regarding the social learning effect on outcomes, the study provides a tentative conclusion that different culture types may have different levels of strength in molding middle management and consequently influencing subordinate outcomes. The model of “culture-leadership-outcome” generally shows a similar pattern with the reverse effect of “leadership-culture-outcome.” Originality/value: This study was the first to examine the impact of organizational culture on leadership and their effect on organizational outcomes, and to compare the reverse relationship. It suggests a new model that combines social cognitive theory with concepts drawn from the social learning perspective. Both the significant and non-significant results enhance our understanding on the mediating effects of leadership and culture. The findings also enrich leadership theory because no empirical studies systematically examined the similarities and differences between style approaches and influence strategies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053276358&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053276358&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/LODJ-05-2017-0122

DO - 10.1108/LODJ-05-2017-0122

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85053276358

VL - 39

SP - 975

EP - 994

JO - Leadership and Organization Development Journal

JF - Leadership and Organization Development Journal

SN - 0143-7739

IS - 8

ER -