Two sides to self-protection

Self-improvement strivings and feedback from close relationships eliminate mnemic neglect

Jeffrey D. Green, Constantine Sedikides, Thomas Bradley Pinter, Daryl Van Tongeren

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

People selectively forget feedback that threatens central self-conceptions, a phenomenon labeled mnemic neglect. Such forgetting serves to protect the self-system, but its rigid application may be associated with liabilities such as failing to learn about one's weaknesses. Two experiments tested the extent to which mnemic neglect is rigid or flexible. In Experiment 1, where self-improvement strivings were primed, mnemic neglect was absent: threatening and non-threatening feedback was recalled equally. In Experiment 2, participants received feedback either from a stranger or a close relationship. Participants recalled poorly threatening stranger feedback but recalled well threatening close-relationship feedback. Self-protection is flexible and strategic. Individuals recall well self-threatening feedback when they are concerned with self-improvement and when the feedback has ramifications for long-term relationships.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)233-250
Number of pages18
JournalSelf and Identity
Volume8
Issue number2-3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 12 2009

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Green, Jeffrey D. ; Sedikides, Constantine ; Pinter, Thomas Bradley ; Van Tongeren, Daryl. / Two sides to self-protection : Self-improvement strivings and feedback from close relationships eliminate mnemic neglect. In: Self and Identity. 2009 ; Vol. 8, No. 2-3. pp. 233-250.
@article{1441e265a1b54e7a8d8f9b8d2007fe46,
title = "Two sides to self-protection: Self-improvement strivings and feedback from close relationships eliminate mnemic neglect",
abstract = "People selectively forget feedback that threatens central self-conceptions, a phenomenon labeled mnemic neglect. Such forgetting serves to protect the self-system, but its rigid application may be associated with liabilities such as failing to learn about one's weaknesses. Two experiments tested the extent to which mnemic neglect is rigid or flexible. In Experiment 1, where self-improvement strivings were primed, mnemic neglect was absent: threatening and non-threatening feedback was recalled equally. In Experiment 2, participants received feedback either from a stranger or a close relationship. Participants recalled poorly threatening stranger feedback but recalled well threatening close-relationship feedback. Self-protection is flexible and strategic. Individuals recall well self-threatening feedback when they are concerned with self-improvement and when the feedback has ramifications for long-term relationships.",
author = "Green, {Jeffrey D.} and Constantine Sedikides and Pinter, {Thomas Bradley} and {Van Tongeren}, Daryl",
year = "2009",
month = "8",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1080/15298860802505145",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "233--250",
journal = "Self and Identity",
issn = "1529-8868",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "2-3",

}

Two sides to self-protection : Self-improvement strivings and feedback from close relationships eliminate mnemic neglect. / Green, Jeffrey D.; Sedikides, Constantine; Pinter, Thomas Bradley; Van Tongeren, Daryl.

In: Self and Identity, Vol. 8, No. 2-3, 12.08.2009, p. 233-250.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Two sides to self-protection

T2 - Self-improvement strivings and feedback from close relationships eliminate mnemic neglect

AU - Green, Jeffrey D.

AU - Sedikides, Constantine

AU - Pinter, Thomas Bradley

AU - Van Tongeren, Daryl

PY - 2009/8/12

Y1 - 2009/8/12

N2 - People selectively forget feedback that threatens central self-conceptions, a phenomenon labeled mnemic neglect. Such forgetting serves to protect the self-system, but its rigid application may be associated with liabilities such as failing to learn about one's weaknesses. Two experiments tested the extent to which mnemic neglect is rigid or flexible. In Experiment 1, where self-improvement strivings were primed, mnemic neglect was absent: threatening and non-threatening feedback was recalled equally. In Experiment 2, participants received feedback either from a stranger or a close relationship. Participants recalled poorly threatening stranger feedback but recalled well threatening close-relationship feedback. Self-protection is flexible and strategic. Individuals recall well self-threatening feedback when they are concerned with self-improvement and when the feedback has ramifications for long-term relationships.

AB - People selectively forget feedback that threatens central self-conceptions, a phenomenon labeled mnemic neglect. Such forgetting serves to protect the self-system, but its rigid application may be associated with liabilities such as failing to learn about one's weaknesses. Two experiments tested the extent to which mnemic neglect is rigid or flexible. In Experiment 1, where self-improvement strivings were primed, mnemic neglect was absent: threatening and non-threatening feedback was recalled equally. In Experiment 2, participants received feedback either from a stranger or a close relationship. Participants recalled poorly threatening stranger feedback but recalled well threatening close-relationship feedback. Self-protection is flexible and strategic. Individuals recall well self-threatening feedback when they are concerned with self-improvement and when the feedback has ramifications for long-term relationships.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68249141553&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=68249141553&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15298860802505145

DO - 10.1080/15298860802505145

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 233

EP - 250

JO - Self and Identity

JF - Self and Identity

SN - 1529-8868

IS - 2-3

ER -