Un Ecart Infime (Part III)

The blind spot in Foucault

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article is the third part of a trilogy investigating the relation between Merleau-Ponty and Foucault. All three essays are inspired by Foucault's diagnosis of our epoch in terms of biopower. They therefore aim at the creation of a new concept of life. In ‘Un Ecart Infime (Part III)’, I lay out Foucault's analysis, from the first chapter of The Order of Things, of Velázquez's painting, Las Meninas. By stressing what Foucault says about the ‘sagittal lines’ exiting the painting, one can show that that there are three major phases in Foucault's analysis: locating the blind spot; multiplying the invisibility; and the diffraction of the multiplicity into singularities. More generally, we can see that Foucault's analysis of the painting concerns the informal space in auto-affection; in other words, it concerns the ‘blind spot’ in the mirror relation, in the ‘psyché’. The blind spot in the ‘soul’ - and the ambiguity in the French word psyché between mirror and soul - is why we can say that Foucault's analysis concerns life: being blind, life must be conceived as informal and unmappable. I show in the conclusion that the inability of mapping and of seeing this space in fact allows for the increase of power.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)665-685
Number of pages21
JournalPhilosophy & Social Criticism
Volume31
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2005

Fingerprint

biotechnology policy
sympathy
Affection
Layout
Las Meninas
Biopower
Multiplicity
Invisibility
Trilogy
French Words
Order of Things
Singularity

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Philosophy
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{8513edafab5041409c5845cfda9b497f,
title = "Un Ecart Infime (Part III): The blind spot in Foucault",
abstract = "This article is the third part of a trilogy investigating the relation between Merleau-Ponty and Foucault. All three essays are inspired by Foucault's diagnosis of our epoch in terms of biopower. They therefore aim at the creation of a new concept of life. In ‘Un Ecart Infime (Part III)’, I lay out Foucault's analysis, from the first chapter of The Order of Things, of Vel{\'a}zquez's painting, Las Meninas. By stressing what Foucault says about the ‘sagittal lines’ exiting the painting, one can show that that there are three major phases in Foucault's analysis: locating the blind spot; multiplying the invisibility; and the diffraction of the multiplicity into singularities. More generally, we can see that Foucault's analysis of the painting concerns the informal space in auto-affection; in other words, it concerns the ‘blind spot’ in the mirror relation, in the ‘psych{\'e}’. The blind spot in the ‘soul’ - and the ambiguity in the French word psych{\'e} between mirror and soul - is why we can say that Foucault's analysis concerns life: being blind, life must be conceived as informal and unmappable. I show in the conclusion that the inability of mapping and of seeing this space in fact allows for the increase of power.",
author = "Lawlor, {Leonard Richard}",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0191453705055494",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "665--685",
journal = "Philosophy and Social Criticism",
issn = "0191-4537",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "6",

}

Un Ecart Infime (Part III) : The blind spot in Foucault. / Lawlor, Leonard Richard.

In: Philosophy & Social Criticism, Vol. 31, No. 6, 01.01.2005, p. 665-685.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Un Ecart Infime (Part III)

T2 - The blind spot in Foucault

AU - Lawlor, Leonard Richard

PY - 2005/1/1

Y1 - 2005/1/1

N2 - This article is the third part of a trilogy investigating the relation between Merleau-Ponty and Foucault. All three essays are inspired by Foucault's diagnosis of our epoch in terms of biopower. They therefore aim at the creation of a new concept of life. In ‘Un Ecart Infime (Part III)’, I lay out Foucault's analysis, from the first chapter of The Order of Things, of Velázquez's painting, Las Meninas. By stressing what Foucault says about the ‘sagittal lines’ exiting the painting, one can show that that there are three major phases in Foucault's analysis: locating the blind spot; multiplying the invisibility; and the diffraction of the multiplicity into singularities. More generally, we can see that Foucault's analysis of the painting concerns the informal space in auto-affection; in other words, it concerns the ‘blind spot’ in the mirror relation, in the ‘psyché’. The blind spot in the ‘soul’ - and the ambiguity in the French word psyché between mirror and soul - is why we can say that Foucault's analysis concerns life: being blind, life must be conceived as informal and unmappable. I show in the conclusion that the inability of mapping and of seeing this space in fact allows for the increase of power.

AB - This article is the third part of a trilogy investigating the relation between Merleau-Ponty and Foucault. All three essays are inspired by Foucault's diagnosis of our epoch in terms of biopower. They therefore aim at the creation of a new concept of life. In ‘Un Ecart Infime (Part III)’, I lay out Foucault's analysis, from the first chapter of The Order of Things, of Velázquez's painting, Las Meninas. By stressing what Foucault says about the ‘sagittal lines’ exiting the painting, one can show that that there are three major phases in Foucault's analysis: locating the blind spot; multiplying the invisibility; and the diffraction of the multiplicity into singularities. More generally, we can see that Foucault's analysis of the painting concerns the informal space in auto-affection; in other words, it concerns the ‘blind spot’ in the mirror relation, in the ‘psyché’. The blind spot in the ‘soul’ - and the ambiguity in the French word psyché between mirror and soul - is why we can say that Foucault's analysis concerns life: being blind, life must be conceived as informal and unmappable. I show in the conclusion that the inability of mapping and of seeing this space in fact allows for the increase of power.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34247673932&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34247673932&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0191453705055494

DO - 10.1177/0191453705055494

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 665

EP - 685

JO - Philosophy and Social Criticism

JF - Philosophy and Social Criticism

SN - 0191-4537

IS - 6

ER -