Undergraduate Students' Justifications for Source Selection in a Digital Academic Context

Alexandra List, Emily M. Grossnickle, Patricia A. Alexander

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To complete any academic tasks using information from the Internet, undergraduate students first have to select the appropriate sources. However, the types of justifications that undergraduates provide for source selection and how these justifications may be impacted by task characteristics have been underexamined. This study explored undergraduates' reported justifications for source selection when responding to questions in a digital academic context. Participants were first asked to answer two questions, one discrete and one open-ended, using an online library of eight sources varying in type and reliability. Subsequently, a guided retrospective interview was used to elicit undergraduates' justifications for source selection. Source selection decisions were coded as epistemic (e.g., concerned with reliability or credibility) or nonepistemic (e.g., concerned with relevance or accessibility). Undergraduate students' justifications were significantly more likely to be nonepistemic than epistemic. Further, the reasons for selection offered differed when participants responded to the discrete versus open-ended question, to a limited extent. Epistemic justifications for source selection were related to a number of outcome measures, while nonepistemic justifications were not. Findings are discussed in reference to research and practice pertaining to undergraduates' multiple source use and task design.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)22-61
Number of pages40
JournalJournal of Educational Computing Research
Volume54
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016

Fingerprint

Students
student
Internet
credibility
interview

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education
  • Computer Science Applications

Cite this

@article{c27c10a9ce4d4429aa62da0b6e2c9d16,
title = "Undergraduate Students' Justifications for Source Selection in a Digital Academic Context",
abstract = "To complete any academic tasks using information from the Internet, undergraduate students first have to select the appropriate sources. However, the types of justifications that undergraduates provide for source selection and how these justifications may be impacted by task characteristics have been underexamined. This study explored undergraduates' reported justifications for source selection when responding to questions in a digital academic context. Participants were first asked to answer two questions, one discrete and one open-ended, using an online library of eight sources varying in type and reliability. Subsequently, a guided retrospective interview was used to elicit undergraduates' justifications for source selection. Source selection decisions were coded as epistemic (e.g., concerned with reliability or credibility) or nonepistemic (e.g., concerned with relevance or accessibility). Undergraduate students' justifications were significantly more likely to be nonepistemic than epistemic. Further, the reasons for selection offered differed when participants responded to the discrete versus open-ended question, to a limited extent. Epistemic justifications for source selection were related to a number of outcome measures, while nonepistemic justifications were not. Findings are discussed in reference to research and practice pertaining to undergraduates' multiple source use and task design.",
author = "Alexandra List and Grossnickle, {Emily M.} and Alexander, {Patricia A.}",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0735633115606659",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "54",
pages = "22--61",
journal = "Journal of Educational Computing Research",
issn = "0735-6331",
publisher = "Baywood Publishing Co. Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Undergraduate Students' Justifications for Source Selection in a Digital Academic Context. / List, Alexandra; Grossnickle, Emily M.; Alexander, Patricia A.

In: Journal of Educational Computing Research, Vol. 54, No. 1, 01.03.2016, p. 22-61.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Undergraduate Students' Justifications for Source Selection in a Digital Academic Context

AU - List, Alexandra

AU - Grossnickle, Emily M.

AU - Alexander, Patricia A.

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - To complete any academic tasks using information from the Internet, undergraduate students first have to select the appropriate sources. However, the types of justifications that undergraduates provide for source selection and how these justifications may be impacted by task characteristics have been underexamined. This study explored undergraduates' reported justifications for source selection when responding to questions in a digital academic context. Participants were first asked to answer two questions, one discrete and one open-ended, using an online library of eight sources varying in type and reliability. Subsequently, a guided retrospective interview was used to elicit undergraduates' justifications for source selection. Source selection decisions were coded as epistemic (e.g., concerned with reliability or credibility) or nonepistemic (e.g., concerned with relevance or accessibility). Undergraduate students' justifications were significantly more likely to be nonepistemic than epistemic. Further, the reasons for selection offered differed when participants responded to the discrete versus open-ended question, to a limited extent. Epistemic justifications for source selection were related to a number of outcome measures, while nonepistemic justifications were not. Findings are discussed in reference to research and practice pertaining to undergraduates' multiple source use and task design.

AB - To complete any academic tasks using information from the Internet, undergraduate students first have to select the appropriate sources. However, the types of justifications that undergraduates provide for source selection and how these justifications may be impacted by task characteristics have been underexamined. This study explored undergraduates' reported justifications for source selection when responding to questions in a digital academic context. Participants were first asked to answer two questions, one discrete and one open-ended, using an online library of eight sources varying in type and reliability. Subsequently, a guided retrospective interview was used to elicit undergraduates' justifications for source selection. Source selection decisions were coded as epistemic (e.g., concerned with reliability or credibility) or nonepistemic (e.g., concerned with relevance or accessibility). Undergraduate students' justifications were significantly more likely to be nonepistemic than epistemic. Further, the reasons for selection offered differed when participants responded to the discrete versus open-ended question, to a limited extent. Epistemic justifications for source selection were related to a number of outcome measures, while nonepistemic justifications were not. Findings are discussed in reference to research and practice pertaining to undergraduates' multiple source use and task design.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958212320&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84958212320&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0735633115606659

DO - 10.1177/0735633115606659

M3 - Article

VL - 54

SP - 22

EP - 61

JO - Journal of Educational Computing Research

JF - Journal of Educational Computing Research

SN - 0735-6331

IS - 1

ER -