Understanding reporting bias in the dietary recall data of 11-year-old girls

Alison K. Ventura, Eric Loken, Diane Crisman Mitchell, Helen Smiciklas-Wright, Leann L. Birch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

75 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: This study describes patterns of bias in self-reported dietary recall data of girls by examining differences among girls classified as under-reporters, plausible reporters, and over-reporters on weight, dietary patterns, and psychosocial characteristics. Research Methods and Procedures: Participants included 176 girls at age 11 and their parents. Girls' weight and height were measured. Three 24-hour dietary recalls and responses to psychosocial measures were collected. Plausibility cut-offs for reported energy intake as a percentage of predicted energy requirements were used to divide the sample into under-reporters, plausible reporters, and over-reporters. Differences among these three groups on dietary and psychosocial variables were assessed to examine possible sources of bias in reporting. Results: Using a ±1 standard deviation cut-off for energy intake plausibility, 50% of the sample was categorized as plausible reporters, 34% as under-reporters, and 16% as over-reporters. Weight status of under-reporters was significantly higher than that of plausible reporters and overreporters. With respect to reported dietary intake, underreporters were no different from plausible reporters on intakes of foods with higher nutrient densities and lower energy densities and were significantly lower than plausible reporters on intakes of foods with lower nutrient densities and higher energy densities. Over-reporters reported signif icantly higher intakes of all food groups and the majority of subgroups, relative to plausible reporters. Under-reporters had significantly higher levels of weight concern and dietary restraint than both plausible reporters and over-reporters. Discussion: Techniques to categorize plausible and implausible reporters can and should be used to provide an improved understanding of the nature of error in children's dietary intake data and account for this error in analysis and interpretation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1073-1084
Number of pages12
JournalObesity
Volume14
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2006

Fingerprint

Weights and Measures
Eating
Energy Intake
Food
Parents
Research

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Endocrinology
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Cite this

Ventura, A. K., Loken, E., Mitchell, D. C., Smiciklas-Wright, H., & Birch, L. L. (2006). Understanding reporting bias in the dietary recall data of 11-year-old girls. Obesity, 14(6), 1073-1084. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2006.123
Ventura, Alison K. ; Loken, Eric ; Mitchell, Diane Crisman ; Smiciklas-Wright, Helen ; Birch, Leann L. / Understanding reporting bias in the dietary recall data of 11-year-old girls. In: Obesity. 2006 ; Vol. 14, No. 6. pp. 1073-1084.
@article{3860e843cd6d497a97640aa10195e15c,
title = "Understanding reporting bias in the dietary recall data of 11-year-old girls",
abstract = "Objective: This study describes patterns of bias in self-reported dietary recall data of girls by examining differences among girls classified as under-reporters, plausible reporters, and over-reporters on weight, dietary patterns, and psychosocial characteristics. Research Methods and Procedures: Participants included 176 girls at age 11 and their parents. Girls' weight and height were measured. Three 24-hour dietary recalls and responses to psychosocial measures were collected. Plausibility cut-offs for reported energy intake as a percentage of predicted energy requirements were used to divide the sample into under-reporters, plausible reporters, and over-reporters. Differences among these three groups on dietary and psychosocial variables were assessed to examine possible sources of bias in reporting. Results: Using a ±1 standard deviation cut-off for energy intake plausibility, 50{\%} of the sample was categorized as plausible reporters, 34{\%} as under-reporters, and 16{\%} as over-reporters. Weight status of under-reporters was significantly higher than that of plausible reporters and overreporters. With respect to reported dietary intake, underreporters were no different from plausible reporters on intakes of foods with higher nutrient densities and lower energy densities and were significantly lower than plausible reporters on intakes of foods with lower nutrient densities and higher energy densities. Over-reporters reported signif icantly higher intakes of all food groups and the majority of subgroups, relative to plausible reporters. Under-reporters had significantly higher levels of weight concern and dietary restraint than both plausible reporters and over-reporters. Discussion: Techniques to categorize plausible and implausible reporters can and should be used to provide an improved understanding of the nature of error in children's dietary intake data and account for this error in analysis and interpretation.",
author = "Ventura, {Alison K.} and Eric Loken and Mitchell, {Diane Crisman} and Helen Smiciklas-Wright and Birch, {Leann L.}",
year = "2006",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1038/oby.2006.123",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "1073--1084",
journal = "Obesity",
issn = "1930-7381",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

Ventura, AK, Loken, E, Mitchell, DC, Smiciklas-Wright, H & Birch, LL 2006, 'Understanding reporting bias in the dietary recall data of 11-year-old girls', Obesity, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1073-1084. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2006.123

Understanding reporting bias in the dietary recall data of 11-year-old girls. / Ventura, Alison K.; Loken, Eric; Mitchell, Diane Crisman; Smiciklas-Wright, Helen; Birch, Leann L.

In: Obesity, Vol. 14, No. 6, 01.06.2006, p. 1073-1084.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding reporting bias in the dietary recall data of 11-year-old girls

AU - Ventura, Alison K.

AU - Loken, Eric

AU - Mitchell, Diane Crisman

AU - Smiciklas-Wright, Helen

AU - Birch, Leann L.

PY - 2006/6/1

Y1 - 2006/6/1

N2 - Objective: This study describes patterns of bias in self-reported dietary recall data of girls by examining differences among girls classified as under-reporters, plausible reporters, and over-reporters on weight, dietary patterns, and psychosocial characteristics. Research Methods and Procedures: Participants included 176 girls at age 11 and their parents. Girls' weight and height were measured. Three 24-hour dietary recalls and responses to psychosocial measures were collected. Plausibility cut-offs for reported energy intake as a percentage of predicted energy requirements were used to divide the sample into under-reporters, plausible reporters, and over-reporters. Differences among these three groups on dietary and psychosocial variables were assessed to examine possible sources of bias in reporting. Results: Using a ±1 standard deviation cut-off for energy intake plausibility, 50% of the sample was categorized as plausible reporters, 34% as under-reporters, and 16% as over-reporters. Weight status of under-reporters was significantly higher than that of plausible reporters and overreporters. With respect to reported dietary intake, underreporters were no different from plausible reporters on intakes of foods with higher nutrient densities and lower energy densities and were significantly lower than plausible reporters on intakes of foods with lower nutrient densities and higher energy densities. Over-reporters reported signif icantly higher intakes of all food groups and the majority of subgroups, relative to plausible reporters. Under-reporters had significantly higher levels of weight concern and dietary restraint than both plausible reporters and over-reporters. Discussion: Techniques to categorize plausible and implausible reporters can and should be used to provide an improved understanding of the nature of error in children's dietary intake data and account for this error in analysis and interpretation.

AB - Objective: This study describes patterns of bias in self-reported dietary recall data of girls by examining differences among girls classified as under-reporters, plausible reporters, and over-reporters on weight, dietary patterns, and psychosocial characteristics. Research Methods and Procedures: Participants included 176 girls at age 11 and their parents. Girls' weight and height were measured. Three 24-hour dietary recalls and responses to psychosocial measures were collected. Plausibility cut-offs for reported energy intake as a percentage of predicted energy requirements were used to divide the sample into under-reporters, plausible reporters, and over-reporters. Differences among these three groups on dietary and psychosocial variables were assessed to examine possible sources of bias in reporting. Results: Using a ±1 standard deviation cut-off for energy intake plausibility, 50% of the sample was categorized as plausible reporters, 34% as under-reporters, and 16% as over-reporters. Weight status of under-reporters was significantly higher than that of plausible reporters and overreporters. With respect to reported dietary intake, underreporters were no different from plausible reporters on intakes of foods with higher nutrient densities and lower energy densities and were significantly lower than plausible reporters on intakes of foods with lower nutrient densities and higher energy densities. Over-reporters reported signif icantly higher intakes of all food groups and the majority of subgroups, relative to plausible reporters. Under-reporters had significantly higher levels of weight concern and dietary restraint than both plausible reporters and over-reporters. Discussion: Techniques to categorize plausible and implausible reporters can and should be used to provide an improved understanding of the nature of error in children's dietary intake data and account for this error in analysis and interpretation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750462176&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33750462176&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/oby.2006.123

DO - 10.1038/oby.2006.123

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 1073

EP - 1084

JO - Obesity

JF - Obesity

SN - 1930-7381

IS - 6

ER -