Understanding the Effects of Stigma Messages: Danger Appraisal and Message Judgments

Rachel Annette Smith, Xun Zhu, Edward L. Fink

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Media coverage of health issues has been criticized for creating health stigmas. The model of stigma communication (MSC, Smith, 2007) provides insights into why this is so, but it has two problems: Some of its mediators have not been supported, and it does not do a good job of predicting the transmission of stigma messages (i.e., social transmission). We present a revised model of stigma message effects in which exposure to stigma messages leads to stigma beliefs and stigmatization as a result of a person-oriented danger appraisal. In addition, message judgments—shock value and common ground—are introduced as mediators of the relationship between danger appraisal and social transmission. Participants (N = 200) were randomly assigned to read a health story written either with or without the intrinsic features of stigma messages. The revised model of stigma-message effects was supported: Reading a health news story written with (vs. without) the intrinsic features of stigma messages resulted in greater danger appraisal, which directly predicted stigma-related outcomes and indirectly predicted social transmission through message judgments. Social transmission varied by message judgment: Shocking messages were shared in ways that facilitate diffusion, but common ground messages were shared with influential others, suggesting different means by which stigma as a collective norm may emerge from interactions among community members.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)424-436
Number of pages13
JournalHealth Communication
Volume34
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 21 2019

Fingerprint

Health
Stereotyping
Reading
Communication
health
stigmatization
news
coverage
human being
communication
interaction
community
Values

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health(social science)
  • Communication

Cite this

@article{6b85028b0c5b4c66af1d8f5dcd3facff,
title = "Understanding the Effects of Stigma Messages: Danger Appraisal and Message Judgments",
abstract = "Media coverage of health issues has been criticized for creating health stigmas. The model of stigma communication (MSC, Smith, 2007) provides insights into why this is so, but it has two problems: Some of its mediators have not been supported, and it does not do a good job of predicting the transmission of stigma messages (i.e., social transmission). We present a revised model of stigma message effects in which exposure to stigma messages leads to stigma beliefs and stigmatization as a result of a person-oriented danger appraisal. In addition, message judgments—shock value and common ground—are introduced as mediators of the relationship between danger appraisal and social transmission. Participants (N = 200) were randomly assigned to read a health story written either with or without the intrinsic features of stigma messages. The revised model of stigma-message effects was supported: Reading a health news story written with (vs. without) the intrinsic features of stigma messages resulted in greater danger appraisal, which directly predicted stigma-related outcomes and indirectly predicted social transmission through message judgments. Social transmission varied by message judgment: Shocking messages were shared in ways that facilitate diffusion, but common ground messages were shared with influential others, suggesting different means by which stigma as a collective norm may emerge from interactions among community members.",
author = "Smith, {Rachel Annette} and Xun Zhu and Fink, {Edward L.}",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1080/10410236.2017.1405487",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "424--436",
journal = "Health Communication",
issn = "1041-0236",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

Understanding the Effects of Stigma Messages : Danger Appraisal and Message Judgments. / Smith, Rachel Annette; Zhu, Xun; Fink, Edward L.

In: Health Communication, Vol. 34, No. 4, 21.03.2019, p. 424-436.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding the Effects of Stigma Messages

T2 - Danger Appraisal and Message Judgments

AU - Smith, Rachel Annette

AU - Zhu, Xun

AU - Fink, Edward L.

PY - 2019/3/21

Y1 - 2019/3/21

N2 - Media coverage of health issues has been criticized for creating health stigmas. The model of stigma communication (MSC, Smith, 2007) provides insights into why this is so, but it has two problems: Some of its mediators have not been supported, and it does not do a good job of predicting the transmission of stigma messages (i.e., social transmission). We present a revised model of stigma message effects in which exposure to stigma messages leads to stigma beliefs and stigmatization as a result of a person-oriented danger appraisal. In addition, message judgments—shock value and common ground—are introduced as mediators of the relationship between danger appraisal and social transmission. Participants (N = 200) were randomly assigned to read a health story written either with or without the intrinsic features of stigma messages. The revised model of stigma-message effects was supported: Reading a health news story written with (vs. without) the intrinsic features of stigma messages resulted in greater danger appraisal, which directly predicted stigma-related outcomes and indirectly predicted social transmission through message judgments. Social transmission varied by message judgment: Shocking messages were shared in ways that facilitate diffusion, but common ground messages were shared with influential others, suggesting different means by which stigma as a collective norm may emerge from interactions among community members.

AB - Media coverage of health issues has been criticized for creating health stigmas. The model of stigma communication (MSC, Smith, 2007) provides insights into why this is so, but it has two problems: Some of its mediators have not been supported, and it does not do a good job of predicting the transmission of stigma messages (i.e., social transmission). We present a revised model of stigma message effects in which exposure to stigma messages leads to stigma beliefs and stigmatization as a result of a person-oriented danger appraisal. In addition, message judgments—shock value and common ground—are introduced as mediators of the relationship between danger appraisal and social transmission. Participants (N = 200) were randomly assigned to read a health story written either with or without the intrinsic features of stigma messages. The revised model of stigma-message effects was supported: Reading a health news story written with (vs. without) the intrinsic features of stigma messages resulted in greater danger appraisal, which directly predicted stigma-related outcomes and indirectly predicted social transmission through message judgments. Social transmission varied by message judgment: Shocking messages were shared in ways that facilitate diffusion, but common ground messages were shared with influential others, suggesting different means by which stigma as a collective norm may emerge from interactions among community members.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85035781725&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85035781725&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10410236.2017.1405487

DO - 10.1080/10410236.2017.1405487

M3 - Article

C2 - 29190126

AN - SCOPUS:85035781725

VL - 34

SP - 424

EP - 436

JO - Health Communication

JF - Health Communication

SN - 1041-0236

IS - 4

ER -