Understanding the "Why" as Well as the "How": Service Performance is a Function of Prosocial Motives and Emotional Labor

Sarina M. Maneotis, Alicia A. Grandey, Autumn D. Krauss

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Which employees tend to better perform with customers? We suggest a combination of individual differences; specifically, we consider both why employees are working (prosocial motivation) and how (emotional labor). Deep acting should enhance the positive relationship between prosocial motivation and performance, while surface acting should dampen this relationship. Using a field sample of 214 grocery clerks and supervisor ratings of interpersonal performance with customers, we did not find the amplifying effect of deep acting. We do find the dampening effect for surface acting, such that surface acting buffers those with low prosocial motives, presumably by allowing them to "act" like they want to help others. This helps to explain the weak relationship of prosocial motives with performance and suggests implications for research and practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)80-97
Number of pages18
JournalHuman Performance
Volume27
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Motivation
Individuality
Buffers
Research
Emotional labour
Surface acting
Service performance
Employees
Buffer
Grocery
Rating
Supervisors
Individual differences

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Applied Psychology
  • Psychology(all)
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

@article{08723f4f0fa1427db9d0f9610d93fce2,
title = "Understanding the {"}Why{"} as Well as the {"}How{"}: Service Performance is a Function of Prosocial Motives and Emotional Labor",
abstract = "Which employees tend to better perform with customers? We suggest a combination of individual differences; specifically, we consider both why employees are working (prosocial motivation) and how (emotional labor). Deep acting should enhance the positive relationship between prosocial motivation and performance, while surface acting should dampen this relationship. Using a field sample of 214 grocery clerks and supervisor ratings of interpersonal performance with customers, we did not find the amplifying effect of deep acting. We do find the dampening effect for surface acting, such that surface acting buffers those with low prosocial motives, presumably by allowing them to {"}act{"} like they want to help others. This helps to explain the weak relationship of prosocial motives with performance and suggests implications for research and practice.",
author = "Maneotis, {Sarina M.} and Grandey, {Alicia A.} and Krauss, {Autumn D.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/08959285.2013.854366",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "80--97",
journal = "Human Performance",
issn = "0895-9285",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

Understanding the "Why" as Well as the "How" : Service Performance is a Function of Prosocial Motives and Emotional Labor. / Maneotis, Sarina M.; Grandey, Alicia A.; Krauss, Autumn D.

In: Human Performance, Vol. 27, No. 1, 01.01.2014, p. 80-97.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding the "Why" as Well as the "How"

T2 - Service Performance is a Function of Prosocial Motives and Emotional Labor

AU - Maneotis, Sarina M.

AU - Grandey, Alicia A.

AU - Krauss, Autumn D.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Which employees tend to better perform with customers? We suggest a combination of individual differences; specifically, we consider both why employees are working (prosocial motivation) and how (emotional labor). Deep acting should enhance the positive relationship between prosocial motivation and performance, while surface acting should dampen this relationship. Using a field sample of 214 grocery clerks and supervisor ratings of interpersonal performance with customers, we did not find the amplifying effect of deep acting. We do find the dampening effect for surface acting, such that surface acting buffers those with low prosocial motives, presumably by allowing them to "act" like they want to help others. This helps to explain the weak relationship of prosocial motives with performance and suggests implications for research and practice.

AB - Which employees tend to better perform with customers? We suggest a combination of individual differences; specifically, we consider both why employees are working (prosocial motivation) and how (emotional labor). Deep acting should enhance the positive relationship between prosocial motivation and performance, while surface acting should dampen this relationship. Using a field sample of 214 grocery clerks and supervisor ratings of interpersonal performance with customers, we did not find the amplifying effect of deep acting. We do find the dampening effect for surface acting, such that surface acting buffers those with low prosocial motives, presumably by allowing them to "act" like they want to help others. This helps to explain the weak relationship of prosocial motives with performance and suggests implications for research and practice.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892516713&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892516713&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/08959285.2013.854366

DO - 10.1080/08959285.2013.854366

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84892516713

VL - 27

SP - 80

EP - 97

JO - Human Performance

JF - Human Performance

SN - 0895-9285

IS - 1

ER -