Union administrative practices: A comparative analysis

Paul F. Clark, Kay Gilbert, Lois S. Gray, Norman Solomon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

In response to growing challenges, many labor organizations are reevaluating themselves in an effort to become more efficient and effective. Their efforts, however, are limited by their frames of reference. Seldom do unions compare practices across labor movements. To expand these frames of reference we compare union administrative practices in three countries: Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Two specific areas of union administration are examined - human resource/personnel practices and strategic planning. Results from these countries are presented and analyzed to identify and explain similarities and differences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)189-201
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Labor Research
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1998

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Strategy and Management
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Union administrative practices: A comparative analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this