Unlocking the influence of leadership network structures on team conflict and viability

Prasad Balkundi, Zoe Barsness, Judd Harrison Michael

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article seeks to test whether a leader's position in the team's informal network strengthens or weakens the leader's team. Based on data collected from 231 employees working in 19 teams in a manufacturing organization, the study tested whether two different leader network centralities in teams' advice networks predicted team conflict and viability. Teams with more prestigious formal leaders (i.e., leaders whom a high proportion of subordinates sought out for advice) experienced lower levels of team conflict and had higher levels of team viability. In contrast, teams with leaders who brokered across subordinates within a team's advice network (i.e., leaders who had advice ties with subordinates who did not have advice ties with each other) reported elevated levels of team conflict and lower levels of team viability, even when controlling for the team leader's prestige. Team conflict mediated the effects of the two leader network positions on team viability.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)301-322
Number of pages22
JournalSmall Group Research
Volume40
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2009

Fingerprint

Conflict (Psychology)

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

@article{4089164081664575b9a5c8c169a1bfb4,
title = "Unlocking the influence of leadership network structures on team conflict and viability",
abstract = "This article seeks to test whether a leader's position in the team's informal network strengthens or weakens the leader's team. Based on data collected from 231 employees working in 19 teams in a manufacturing organization, the study tested whether two different leader network centralities in teams' advice networks predicted team conflict and viability. Teams with more prestigious formal leaders (i.e., leaders whom a high proportion of subordinates sought out for advice) experienced lower levels of team conflict and had higher levels of team viability. In contrast, teams with leaders who brokered across subordinates within a team's advice network (i.e., leaders who had advice ties with subordinates who did not have advice ties with each other) reported elevated levels of team conflict and lower levels of team viability, even when controlling for the team leader's prestige. Team conflict mediated the effects of the two leader network positions on team viability.",
author = "Prasad Balkundi and Zoe Barsness and Michael, {Judd Harrison}",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1046496409333404",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "301--322",
journal = "Small Group Research",
issn = "1046-4964",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Unlocking the influence of leadership network structures on team conflict and viability. / Balkundi, Prasad; Barsness, Zoe; Michael, Judd Harrison.

In: Small Group Research, Vol. 40, No. 3, 01.06.2009, p. 301-322.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unlocking the influence of leadership network structures on team conflict and viability

AU - Balkundi, Prasad

AU - Barsness, Zoe

AU - Michael, Judd Harrison

PY - 2009/6/1

Y1 - 2009/6/1

N2 - This article seeks to test whether a leader's position in the team's informal network strengthens or weakens the leader's team. Based on data collected from 231 employees working in 19 teams in a manufacturing organization, the study tested whether two different leader network centralities in teams' advice networks predicted team conflict and viability. Teams with more prestigious formal leaders (i.e., leaders whom a high proportion of subordinates sought out for advice) experienced lower levels of team conflict and had higher levels of team viability. In contrast, teams with leaders who brokered across subordinates within a team's advice network (i.e., leaders who had advice ties with subordinates who did not have advice ties with each other) reported elevated levels of team conflict and lower levels of team viability, even when controlling for the team leader's prestige. Team conflict mediated the effects of the two leader network positions on team viability.

AB - This article seeks to test whether a leader's position in the team's informal network strengthens or weakens the leader's team. Based on data collected from 231 employees working in 19 teams in a manufacturing organization, the study tested whether two different leader network centralities in teams' advice networks predicted team conflict and viability. Teams with more prestigious formal leaders (i.e., leaders whom a high proportion of subordinates sought out for advice) experienced lower levels of team conflict and had higher levels of team viability. In contrast, teams with leaders who brokered across subordinates within a team's advice network (i.e., leaders who had advice ties with subordinates who did not have advice ties with each other) reported elevated levels of team conflict and lower levels of team viability, even when controlling for the team leader's prestige. Team conflict mediated the effects of the two leader network positions on team viability.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=65549133395&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=65549133395&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1046496409333404

DO - 10.1177/1046496409333404

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 301

EP - 322

JO - Small Group Research

JF - Small Group Research

SN - 1046-4964

IS - 3

ER -