Unmeasured Confounding and Racial or Ethnic Disparities in Disability Identification

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Students who are Black or Hispanic are now reported to be less likely to be identified as having disabilities than similarly situated students who are White. Although repeatedly replicated, this finding is often characterized as in error. I use a new statistical technique, the E-value, to quantify the likelihood that unmeasured confounding explains observed associations between race or ethnicity and disability identification. Results based on calculations across three population-based studies using extensive statistical controls suggest that unmeasured confounding is an unlikely explanation for the observed associations. Unmeasured confounding that would result in levels of overidentification consistent with federal law and regulation is especially unlikely.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)351-361
Number of pages11
JournalEducational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
Volume43
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2021

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Unmeasured Confounding and Racial or Ethnic Disparities in Disability Identification'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this